SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9 número4Simulación y revisión de un dispositivo de pequeña escala para la conversión de energía del oleajeContraste por ETP del RDI en tres localidades climáticas de San Luis Potosí, México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Tecnología y ciencias del agua

versión On-line ISSN 2007-2422

Resumen

TORRES, Marco Antonio; NIKOLSKII, Iourii; MARTINEZ-MIRANDA, María Eugenia  y  MARTINEZ, Mario R.. Hydrological assessment of the Teapa River basin, using the MIKE SHE model. Tecnol. cienc. agua [online]. 2018, vol.9, n.4, pp.130-146.  Epub 24-Nov-2020. ISSN 2007-2422.  https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-2018-04-06.

The MIKE SHE hydrological model was applied by the present work in order to simulate water runoff from the Teapa River basin in southeastern Mexico. The basin has a humid tropical climate, high slopes, and is relatively little altered by human activities. There is relatively detailed information on climatic conditions, topography, vegetation, and soils in the basin, as well as data on the hydrologic regime of Teapa River. The MIKE SHE model is preferible because of its high capacity to process detailed characteristics of the river basin. The process to simulate the Teapa River’s hydrological regime involved two calculation stages. First, calibration of the model by means of some of its parameters, initially determined and related with hydrophysical properties of soils and hydraulic roughness of the surface, for a better fit between calculated and observed river discharges. Then, validation of the model by comparing calculated and observed river discharges. The results of the simulation showed that the MIKE SHE model validation process resulted in a rather good fit between the calculated and observed mean and maximum monthly discharges from the Teapa River, with a determination coefficient of R 2 = 0.81. However, the calculated and observed daily discharges did not result in a good fit, with R 2 = 0.62. A large number of model parameters, each of which presumably had an error, can possibly explain such a relatively low fit for the daily discharges.

Palabras llave : Hydrologic modelling; distributed models; MIKE SHE.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español | Inglés     · Español ( pdf ) | Inglés ( pdf )