SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.4 número3Eventos de intrusión patógena en sistemas de distribución de agua potableComparación morfodinámica de la costa noroeste del estado de Quintana Roo, México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Tecnología y ciencias del agua

versión On-line ISSN 2007-2422

Resumen

DEVORA-ISIORDIA, Germán Eduardo; GONZALEZ-ENRIQUEZ, Rodrigo  y  RUIZ-CRUZ, Saúl. Evaluation of desalination processes and their development in Mexico. Tecnol. cienc. agua [online]. 2013, vol.4, n.3, pp.27-46. ISSN 2007-2422.

Different desalination processes exist, which are differentiate by their cost, environmental impact, the quality of the product and energy consumption. A comparison of thermal and membrane processes identified the existing technologies to desalinate seawater, the number of installed plants, the technology used, the supply source and the use of desalinated water. The technical feasibility and main objective of this work was the study and comparison of thermal and membrane desalination systems with respect to production costs in USD/m3 and energy consumption in kWh/m3. Desalination systems have been in practice since 1970 with the use of membrane systems (reverse osmosis (RO), electrodialysis (ED) and nanofiltration (NF)) and thermal systems (multiple stage distillation (MED), multiple stage flash distillation (MSF), and solar distillation (SD)). Of the 13,000 plants installed, 50% use RO, 33% use NF, 1% MSD and 4% MSF. The most common supply sources are seawater (60%) and brackish water (22%). The beneficiaries of this desalinated water are the municipal (66%) and the industrial (23%) sectors. The type of technology that requires less energy consumption is RO, from 2 to 2.8 kWh/m3 at a cost of 0.6 USD/m3, whereas MSD and MSF technologies consume 3.4 to 4 kWh/m3 and 5 to 8 kWh/m3 at a production cost of 1.5 USD/m3 and 1.10 USD/m3, respectively. The comparison of technologies determined that energy consumption and production costs are less and production is greater with RO. Moreover, RO has significant advantages over other systems, such as not requiring phase changes, unlike MED and MSF. Reverse osmosis is the most feasible process with regard to production, energy consumption and cost.

Palabras llave : reverse osmosis; electrodialysis; distillation; desalination; water quality; cations; anions.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons