SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 issue3Evaluation and management of condylar fractures in pediatric patientsSurgical treatment of the giant cells granuloma. Case report author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista odontológica mexicana

Print version ISSN 1870-199X

Abstract

ANDRADE GONGORA, Deyanira  and  PORTILLO GUERRERO, Germán. Intercanine with in 3-year-old Mexican children according facial type. Rev. Odont. Mex [online]. 2010, vol.14, n.3, pp.156-163. ISSN 1870-199X.

The intercanine width in the temporal teeth is a predictor of the space that will be required for anterior permanent teeth. Facial type determines the characteristics of lower third in the face. Objective: To determine the average of the intercanine width in the first dentition and facial type (according to Ricketts criteria13) during the period 2003-2005 in 3-year-old children at CENDI UNAM. To identify if there are differences in the intercanine width between genders. To determine the Baume classification for gender and facial type. Methods: A transversal study in 161 children was carried out. The statistical tests used form the SPSS 12.0 program were: Chi-Square for Baume classification for arches and gender; Baume classification for facial type and gender, and ANOVA for intercanine width for arches and gender; and intercanine width for facial type. Results: In the upper arch the average of the intercanine width was 35.80 mm (DE ± 3.16) and 26.68 mm (DE ± 2.76) in the lower arch. The differences were statistically significant in the average of intercanine width in the upper arch for gender (p = .034) than in the lower arch (p = .094). The porcentual distribution for facial type in girls was 37.7% mesofacial, 43.5% brachyfacial y 18.8% dolicofacial. In male the values were as follows: 41.3%, 34.8 and 23.9% respectively. Conclusions: Boys had a longer intercanine width in the upper arch than girls, the longer intercanine width corresponds to brachyfacial type in both arches. Mesofacial was the main facial type in boys and brachyfacial was the main in girls, the main Baume classification in both arches was type I in boys and type II in girls.

Keywords : Facial type; intercanine width; Baume classification.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )