SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 issue2Determination in the differences between proportion of bone tissue and soft tissue in patients with hemifacial microsomy with simultaneous mandibular and maxillary osteogenic distractionEvaluation of the necessities of dental attention for paediatric patients with HIV/AIDS with dental health indicators author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista odontológica mexicana

Print version ISSN 1870-199X

Abstract

RAMIREZ ORTEGA, Paulina; BARCELO SANTANA, Federico; PACHECO FLORES, Ma. Lourdes  and  RAMIREZ FLORES, Fabiola. Adhesion and microfiltration of two pit and fissure sealants with different polymerization system. Rev. Odont. Mex [online]. 2007, vol.11, n.2, pp.70-75. ISSN 1870-199X.  https://doi.org/10.22201/fo.1870199xp.2007.11.2.15869.

The pit and fissure sealants have been used successfully in preventive dentistry as a physical barrier to isolate fissures from oral fluids. We have to consider different factors such as the quality of adhesion to the tooth enamel, microleakage and the polymerization system which can be a chemical reaction or light activation. The aim of this study was to compare the adhesion and microleakage of two pit and fissure sealants of the same manufacturer with different polymerization system. Forty human molars without caries or restorations extracted for orthodontic reasons were used in this study. Four groups of ten teeth each were randomly selected. Prophylaxis was made on all molars. The sealants were handled according to the manufactures instructions. Adhesion test: previous acid etching groups 1 and 3 received a sample of each sealant on the vestibular face, then were stored in deionized water (37 ± 1°C). Forty-eight hours later they were tested by applying a tractional load (Instron machine, 1 mm/min). Microleakage test: Occlusal fissures of the 2 and 4 groups were etched and sealed with a chemical- and light-activated sealants respectively, then thermocycled (1,000 cycles; 5-45°C). A coat of acrylic resin and nail varnish was placed on the molars leaving the occlusal surface free and immersed for 4 hours in a 2% methylene blue dye. Molars were sectioned buccolingually and examined with a stereomicroscope (10X). The results of the adhesion test were analyzed with a Student t that showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.035) between both polymerization systems. Twenty percent of the specimens sealed with a light-activated sealant presented microleakage; 45% of specimens sealed with a chemical reaction sealant presented microleakage. These results were compared by the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test. No statistical significant differences were found (p = 0.179).

Keywords : Microleakage; adhesion; pit and fissure sealant.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )