SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.16 special issue 2The Process of Counting and Counting: Omissions of the Electoral AuthoritiesReforms to Cofipe, 2007 author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Política y gobierno

Print version ISSN 1665-2037

Abstract

APARICIO, Javier. Statistical Analysis of the Presidential Election in 2006: Fraud or Random Errors?. Polít. gob [online]. 2009, vol.16, n.spe2, pp.225-243. ISSN 1665-2037.

This paper tests some of the main fraud allegations of the 2006 presidential election in Mexico with the evidence from a statistical analysis of precinct-level data. First, I analyze the data flow from the quick count, the preliminary results (PREP) and the official district tally (cómputo distrital). Secondly, I analyze the size and distribution of errors in the polling-station acts and the partial recount. Lastly, I consider atypical precincts and the role of party representatives. My main conclusion is that, since most fraud allegations are not supported by the evidence, the presidential election outcome is statistically reliable.

Keywords : election forensics; fraud.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License