SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 número27Axiomatización, demostración y análisis en Acerca del CieloTotalidad y negatividad en la Ciencia de la lógica de Hegel índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Signos filosóficos

versión impresa ISSN 1665-1324

Resumen

TERESA, José Marcos de. Dead-ends: Two reconstructions of the answer to the Cartesian circle. Sig. Fil [online]. 2012, vol.14, n.27, pp.43-70. ISSN 1665-1324.

The problem of logical circularity, which traditionally has been blamed on Cartesian metaphysics, was clearly seen by Descartes himself, who moreover advertised its avoidance (or its solution) as a crucial merit of his own philosophy. On this subject two of the most popular commentaries on Descartes -those of Margaret Wilson and John Cottingham, which are widely used in teaching at least in Spanish- are criticized. Some of the objections I set here against both readings are textual in nature, while other ones hinge, as I argue, on their respective conceptual weaknesses. Wilson's proposed solution is shown to the botched, while Cottingham is shown to fail in his attempt to dissolve the problem.

Palabras llave : circle; Cottingham; Descartes; interpretation; Wilson.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons