SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.79 número4Eficacia de los cuidados madre canguro sobre la resiliencia de la madre y la autoeficacia de la lactancia materna mediante el método de juego de roles en una unidad de cuidados intensivos neonatalesTaquicardia ventricular fascicular izquierda idiopática en niños y adolescentes índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México

versión impresa ISSN 1665-1146

Resumen

OSORNO-COVARRUBIAS, Lorenzo et al. Perception of neonatology staff regarding the availability of equipment and supplies for the care of patients in need of nCPAP. Bol. Med. Hosp. Infant. Mex. [online]. 2022, vol.79, n.4, pp.237-247.  Epub 28-Sep-2022. ISSN 1665-1146.  https://doi.org/10.24875/bmhim.21000225.

Background:

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is Mexico’s second leading cause of neonatal mortality. The 75% reduction in mortality due to RDS has been attributed to the use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). A survey was conducted to determine the perception of the medical staff regarding the availability of nCPAP equipment and supplies in Mexican hospitals with neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

Methods:

We sent a survey via e-mail to several neonatologists in each state of the country, requesting only one response per hospital. We performed statistical analysis with SPSS software.

Results:

We received 195 surveys from private (HPri) and public (HPub) hospitals with NICUs nationwide: 100% of HPri and 39% of HPub. More than 75% of the nursing and medical staff had received formal training in nCPAP in 11% of HPri and 5% of HPub. The perceived availability of CPAP equipment was 83.7% vs. 52.1%; nasal cannula supply, 75.5% vs. 36.3%; air/oxygen blender availability, 51.0% vs. 32.9%, in HPri and HPub, respectively. The observed differences were statistically significant. Significant differences were also found among healthcare institutions.

Conclusions:

The availability of CPAP equipment and consumables between HPub and HPri is unbalanced and is lower in public institutions. Bubble CPAP is not included essential equipment in the national catalog of instruments and equipment for public hospitals, and its request is complicated. The training of CPAP staff and the availability of bubble CPAP and supplies in public hospitals should be improved.

Palabras llave : Respiratory distress syndrome; Nasal continuous positive airway pressure; Newborn; Hospital equipment and supplies; Secondary and tertiary care hospital; Neonatal care.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )