Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos
Links relacionados
- Similares en SciELO
Compartir
Sinéctica
versión On-line ISSN 2007-7033versión impresa ISSN 1665-109X
Resumen
PINTO RODRIGUEZ, Libertad; CORTEZ CANCHARI, Nazareth; GUZMAN PACO, Daniel y CURIVIL BRAVO, Felipe Domingo. Emerging experiences of researcher’s descolonizing methodologies in front to epistemic extractivism. Contributions for the intra, intercultural and multilingual educative research in Bolivia. Sinéctica [online]. 2018, n.50. ISSN 2007-7033. https://doi.org/10.31391/s2007-7033(2018)0050-010.
The main objective of the current study reflects and questions the colonial methodologies on research. This is based on the indigenous people’s vision in order to make a small contribution to the fields on intercultural and plurilingual education of Bolivia. In this sense, a bibliographical revision has mainly carried out. This bibliography was based on the research on Taller de Historia Oral Andina, the Programa de Formación en Educación Intercultural Bilingüe para los Países Andinos, Agroecología Universidad Cochabamba, and the Consejos Educativos de Pueblos Originarios. The four experiences are gradually distant from the colonial traditional methodologies that come from the modern sciences. The proposals of those experiences, with more or less emphasis, find the dialogue with millennial indigenous knowledge systems. These experiences are critically framed in the new Sociocommunitary Productive Educative System in Bolivia in the sense that could bring us important approaches in the required construction in order to study models with a communitarian transversal vision in the education systems. The principal contributions of these experiences are oral history, the academic training of the indigenous scholars, the construction of southern epistemic models, and the community management of knowledge.
Palabras llave : researcher’s methodologies; interculturality; indigenous knowledge systems; educational sociocommunity researching; epistemic extractivism; epistemic pluralism.