SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.87 número4Deformación longitudinal global como un biomarcador en miocardiopatía diabética. Estudio comparativo con galectina-3 en pacientes con fracción de eyección preservada índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Archivos de cardiología de México

versión On-line ISSN 1665-1731versión impresa ISSN 1405-9940

Resumen

ILARRAZA-LOMELI, Hermes et al. National Registry of Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Mexico II (RENAPREC II). Arch. Cardiol. Méx. [online]. 2017, vol.87, n.4, pp.270-277. ISSN 1665-1731.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acmx.2016.04.010.

Objective:

The aim of this paper is to compare the state of Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs (CRP) in 2009 with 2015. Focus is directed on health care, training of health-providers, research, and the barriers to their implementation.

Methods:

All authors of RENAPREC-2009, and other cardiac rehabilitation leaders in Mexico were requested to participate. These centres were distributed into two groups: RENAPREC-2009 centres that participated in 2015, and the new CRP units.

Results:

In 2009 there were 14 centres, two of which disappeared and another two did not respond. CRP-units increased by 71% (n = 24), and their geographic distribution shows a centripetal pattern. The coverage of CRP-units was 0.02 centres per 100,000 inhabitants. Only 4.4% of eligible patients were referred to CRP, with a rate of 10.4 patients/100,000 inhabitants in 2015. The ratio of Clinical Cardiologists to Cardiac Rehabilitation Specialists was 94:1, and the ratio of Intervention Specialists to cardiac rehabilitation experts was 16:1. Cardiac rehabilitation activities and costs varied widely. Patient dropout rate in phase II was 12%. Several barriers were identified: financial crisis (83%), lack of skilled personnel (67%), deficient equipment (46%), inadequate areas (42%), and a reduced number of operating centres (38%).

Conclusions:

CRPs in Mexico are still in the process of maturing. Mexican CRP-centres have several strengths, like the quality of the education of the professionals and the multidisciplinary programs. However, the lack of referral of patients and the heterogeneity of procedures are still their main weaknesses.

Palabras llave : Cardiac rehabilitation; Mexico; Prevention; Myocardial infarction; Heart failure; Exercise.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )