SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número48Análisis de la normatividad nacional e internacional sobre el derecho de atención en salud integral de las personas migrantes venezolanas en situación de irregularidad en ColombiaDeterminantes de las designaciones de ministros de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de México, 1995-2021 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Cuestiones constitucionales

versión impresa ISSN 1405-9193

Resumen

BRITTO, Melina Carla de Souza  y  BARBOSA, Claudia Maria. Dysfunctionalities of the Liberal Institutional Model: Juristocracy and Backlash. Cuest. Const. [online]. 2023, n.48, pp.131-150.  Epub 12-Ene-2024. ISSN 1405-9193.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2023.48.18038.

Contemporary constitutionalism promotes the expansion and opening of the constitutional text, expanding the discretion of the Judiciary, making the classic separation of powers, the essence of liberal constitutionalism, insufficient. Juristocracy and backlash, which are associated with the crisis of liberal constitutionalism, are indicatives of the insufficiency of the liberal institutional model adopted by contemporary constitutionalism. This article uses the deductive method and the indirect documentary research technique, notably the bibliographic, and jurisprudential. We conclude that juristocracy and backlash are expressions of the fragility of the liberal institutional arrangement, bringing into discussion the traditional liberal tension between countermajoritarism and majoritarianism (between constitutionalism and democracy) and the need for new institutional arrangements.

Palabras llave : constitutionalism; juristocracy; backlash; institutional arrangements.

        · resumen en Portugués     · texto en Portugués     · Portugués ( pdf )