SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número30Interés legítimo en amparo: Un instrumento procesal "comunitarista" índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Cuestiones constitucionales

versión impresa ISSN 1405-9193

Resumen

DEL ROSARIO RODRIGUEZ, Marcos  y  SANCHEZ BARROSO, José Antonio. The fundamental rights and their reaches in the federal system: analysis on the case of the next choice pill in constitutional controversy 54/2009. Cuest. Const. [online]. 2014, n.30, pp.179-205. ISSN 1405-9193.

When the NOM-046-SSA2-2005 was published, it established the obligation of any health services institution to provide the commonly called morning-after pill, in cases where there is sexual and family violence against women, apparently looking defend their physical and mental integrity. The fact is, with his force, and then, with its declared constitutional by the Supreme Court's Office in the controversy 54/2009, this generated a very favorable, for the full exercise of the objection awareness, respect for life from conception, and the proper understanding of what should be a comprehensive federal purview. To the extent that human rights recognized in various jurisdictions, such is the case of local constitutions-are not advised as real factors of supremacy, in effect, recognition and protection, will be seriously undermined, leading to an impairment to the whole constitutional system.

Palabras llave : Next choice pill; right to the life; invasion competitions; Official Mexican Norm.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons