SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 número3Aplicación práctica de las funciones Cópula en el Análisis de Frecuencias Bivariado (Q,V) de Crecientes Anuales índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Ingeniería, investigación y tecnología

versión On-line ISSN 2594-0732versión impresa ISSN 1405-7743

Resumen

HUELSZ-LESBROS, Guadalupe; ALVAREZ-ALMEIDA, Gabriela; ROJAS-MENDEZ, Jorge  y  BARRIOS DEL VALLE, Guillermo. Importance of taking into account the thermal mass in simulations for a non-air-conditioned house. Ing. invest. y tecnol. [online]. 2022, vol.23, n.3, e1940.  Epub 07-Nov-2022. ISSN 2594-0732.  https://doi.org/10.22201/fi.25940732e.2022.23.3.024.

Building thermal simulation (BTS) programs are being increasingly used to evaluate the occupants’ thermal comfort and the building’s energy consumption. Although some authors have pointed out that not taking into account the thermal mass of the building’s components results in erroneous performance predictions, some BTS program users, standards and building rating systems still do not consider the thermal mass. The quantification of the difference in the simulations’ predictions of the performance of a building when its thermal mass is either considered (M) or ignored (NM) have been reported in the literature for air-conditioned buildings (AC). In this work, and for the first time, the quantification is made for a non-air-conditioned (nAC) building. The quantification of the difference between M and NM simulations’ results is also made for the same building but with AC. Simulations were carried out using EnergyPlus and considering four study cases according to the constructive systems of walls and roofs. The building is a house located in Monterrey, a Mexican city with a hot summer and a mild winter. For the nAC house the differences in monthly averages for the daily maximum and for the daily minimum temperatures between M and NM simulations are up to 8.3oC and 6.4oC respectively, and differences for the cold and hot discomfort degree hours are up to 124 %. For the AC house the differences between M and NM simulations on the cooling and heating thermal loads are up to 30 %. The difference in the air conditioning peak power demand is up to 38 %, and the difference in the time this peak occurs is up to 4 hours. These results show that differences between simulations are larger for the nAC house than they are for the AC house.

Palabras llave : Heat transfer; thermal mass; buildings thermal simulation; time-dependent model; time-independent model.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )