SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.46 número8Análisis histológico foliar de cítricos agrios y naranja dulce con síntomas ocasionados por Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticusEstudio de especies de pino para restauración de sitios degradados índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Agrociencia

versión On-line ISSN 2521-9766versión impresa ISSN 1405-3195

Resumen

CERNA, Ernesto et al. Comparison of toxicity and selectivity of the pest Bactericera cockerelli and its predator Chrysoperla carnea. Agrociencia [online]. 2012, vol.46, n.8, pp.783-793. ISSN 2521-9766.

Chemical and biological control in sustainable management requires understanding the risks, selectivity and conditions of use for insecticides, in order to maximize their compatibility. Therefore, the tolerance of Chrysoperla carnea and Bactericera cockerelli to field concentrations of 18, 180, 1200, 1300 and 1400 ppm L-1 of the insecticides abamectin, bifenthrin, endosulfan, imidacloprid and profenofos was evaluated, and, in addition, their selectivity on predator Chrysoperla carnea. The selectivity proportion of insecticides to C. carnea was calculated through the relation SP = CL50 of the insecticide for the natural enemy/CL50 of the insecticide for the plague. Abactemin, bifenthrin and endosulfan were more toxic for B. cockerelli than for C. carnea. Profenofos was highly toxic for both species and imidacloprid was more toxic for C. carnea. The values for the selectivity proportion were 1072.84, 14.33, 6.07, 0.61 and 0.11 for abamectin, endosulfan, bifenthrin, profenofos and imidacloprid, indicating that abamectin was highly selective, endosulfan and bifenthrin were selective and profenofos and imidacloprid were not selective for the predator.

Palabras llave : integrated control; selectivity; tolerance; lethal concentration.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons