SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 número1Condición de copa de bosques y selvas de México: Análisis 2014Composición, diversidad y estructura de un bosque manejado del centro de México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Madera y bosques

versión On-line ISSN 2448-7597versión impresa ISSN 1405-0471

Resumen

PEREZ-VAZQUEZ, Zaira Rosario et al. Spatial approach for modeling litter carbon in forests under management for timber production. Madera bosques [online]. 2021, vol.27, n.1, e2712122.  Epub 27-Sep-2021. ISSN 2448-7597.  https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2021.2712122.

Forest floor or mulch is the carbon stock that regulates most of the functional processes of forest ecosystems, directly influencing soil fertility and site productivity. The forest floor carbon content is highly variable in space and time; therefore, obtaining accurate assessment of the carbon contained in this stock represents a significant methodological challenge at any scale. In this study, four spatial modeling methods were compared to map forest floor carbon content in a temperate forest. The methods were ordinary kriging, generalized linear model, generalized additive model and random forest. Carbon content estimates were made for 2013 and 2018. The predictor variables represent the spatial, canopy and topographic structure present in the study area. All models were evaluated by ten-fold cross validation and the mean absolute error, root mean square error and the coefficient of determination (R2) were determined. The performance of the methods was, in decreasing order, random forest, generalized additive model, generalized linear model and ordinary kriging. The ordinary kriging method reflected the degree of spatial dependence of carbon content, but the spatial estimates were unrealistic (R2 ≤ 0.35). Generalized additive model and generalized linear model showed good performance (R2 ≥ 0.70), but higher overestimation; random forest obtained the best fit (R2 ≥ 0.86) to model carbon content in both years evaluated. It is concluded that random forest is a promising method with high potential to improve estimates of forest floor carbon at landscape scale.

Palabras llave : carbon stocks; geostatistics; generalized additive model; generalized lineal model; forest floor; random forest; spatial variability.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )