SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número55Book Symposium sobre Judging Positivism de Margaret Martin: Introducción¿Puede la tesis del reemplazo de Raz sobrevivir en el contexto de una teoría dworkiniana del derecho y de la adjudicación? índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Isonomía

versión impresa ISSN 1405-0218

Resumen

COELHO, André L. S.. Elephants and Flashlights: On Martin on Raz. Isonomía [online]. 2021, n.55, pp.168-178.  Epub 28-Feb-2022. ISSN 1405-0218.  https://doi.org/10.5347/isonomia.v0i55.491.

The paper responds to some of Margaret Martin’s criticisms of Joseph Raz’s legal theory in her book Judging Positivism, especially the alleged change in Raz’s account of adjudication and its potential negative impact on Raz’s legal theory. To that end, I treat Raz’s theory in particular, and analytic legal theories in general, as providing a picture of what law would be like if it were fully determined by certain aspects rather than revealing essential aspects of what law is. In this sense, legal theories are compared, as in the famous Indian parable, to blind men trying to describe what an elephant is, a comparison that is later completed by the idea of the periodic rotation of a lantern, which illuminates each time a different aspect of the animal.

Palabras llave : Joseph Raz; Margaret Martin; legal exclusive positivism; adjudication.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )