SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número51La rigidez constitucional mínima como una forma débil del constitucionalismoLa justicia del derecho según el constitucionalismo (inter)nacional frente a una pregunta desorientadora índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Isonomía

versión impresa ISSN 1405-0218

Resumen

FAZIO, Federico De. Proportionality Test and Constitutional Social Rights Adjudication. Isonomía [online]. 2019, n.51, pp.95-115.  Epub 07-Ago-2020. ISSN 1405-0218.  https://doi.org/10.5347/isonomia.v0i51.229.

The aim of this article is to reconstruct in a rational way the use of the proportionality test in contexts of constitutional social rights adjudication. Such a reconstruction will be developed in two steps. Firstly, I will address the question as to whether proportionality test in its “by omission” version (i.e. used to apply positive rights) shows or not a different structure in comparison with its, much better known and investigated, “by excess” version (i.e., used to apply negative rights). Secondly, I will describe the rules and forms of reasoning that are implied in the use of proportionality test by omission and integrate, respectively, the sub-tests of suitability, necessity and proportionality stricto sensu. Finally, I will present a brief summary as a conclusion.

Palabras llave : proportionality test; constitutional social rights; theory of judicial adjudication.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )