SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 número2Uso de toxina botulínica en cicatriz queloide índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Cirujano general

versión impresa ISSN 1405-0099

Resumen

BERNAL GOMEZ, Roberto et al. Ventral hernia: laparoscopic vs open approach. Cir. gen [online]. 2014, vol.36, n.2, pp.68-75. ISSN 1405-0099.

Introduction: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair shares many principles of open Rives-Stoppa repair, with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Material and Methods: This Cohort study where results compared two approaches Ventral hernia repair: laparoscopic (A) and open Rives-Stoppa type (B). Evaluation included: operative time, type of hernia (recurring or not), size of the defect, complications, laparoscopic conversion and recurrences. Results: Average operating time: 60 vs 80 minutes, laparoscopic vs open, respectively. Defect size was 6-10 cm, 10-15 cm and over 15 cm in 79% and 74%, 18% and 24% and 2% and 1% for groups A and B. The hospital stay property was 24 hours in 60% of group A and 5 to 7 days in 60% of patients in Group B. Analgesics were used for 48 hours and for 7 days to Groups A and B respectively. There were seroma (8.3%) and persistent pain (4.1%) in group A. There was seroma (9.2%), hematoma (3.7%), wound infection (1.8%) and persistent pain (1.8%) in group B. There were two relapses in each group. Conclusion: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is a safe and effective approach and can be performed with morbidity and recurrence rate similar to open surgery with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.

Palabras llave : Ventral hernia; Incisional hernia; Complications; Mesh.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )