SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.88 número9Desenlaces en ciclos de transferencia con embriones vitrificados: análisis de dos esquemas de preparación endometrialMastitis granulomatosa idiopática: características demográficas, clínicas e imagenológicas en una serie de casos índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Ginecología y obstetricia de México

versão impressa ISSN 0300-9041

Resumo

SANTA MARIA-ORTIZ, Johana et al. Importance of surgical margins affected in cervical uterine conization. Ginecol. obstet. Méx. [online]. 2020, vol.88, n.9, pp.586-597.  Epub 04-Out-2021. ISSN 0300-9041.  https://doi.org/10.24245/gom.v88i9.4317.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the association between affected margins with persistence-recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, persistence of human papillomavirus and re-interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Study of cases and controls nested in a retrospective cohort of the Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense (January 2010-October 2017). Inclusion criteria: women with at least one post-intervention check-up. Exclusion criteria: women without evidence of high-grade dysplasia in the conization piece and who were not followed up. Study variables: age, smoking, condom, oral contraceptives, HPV vaccination, persistence-recurrence of CIN and HPV, and re-operation. Parametric and non-parametric tests were performed among the variables.

RESULTS:

The cohort consisted of 248 women, 81 of whom (32.6%) had affected surgical margins on conization. Immunosuppression, smoking and oral contraception were the most frequent associations in affected margins. Condom use and HPV vaccination were significantly more frequent in free margins. Affected margins reported greater persistence of HPV (50 vs 23.9%; OR 3.17 (1.90-5.26), p < 0.001), persistent-recurrent disease (47.2 vs 22.5%; OR 3.07 (1.84-5.12), p < 0.001), and reinterventions (40.2 vs 15.4%; OR 3.679 (2.094-6.463), p < 0.028). The most affected margin was, in descending order, endocervical (55.6%), exocervical (25%) and both (19.4%).

CONCLUSIONS:

The affected margin confers a significant risk in the evolution of HPV infection and disease recurrence.

Palavras-chave : Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Surgical Margins; Human Papillomavirus; Conization; Oral contraception; Condom use; HPV Vaccination; HPV Infection.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )