SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número56Imparcialidad y particularismo moralIgualitarismo de la suerte. Análisis de la responsabilidad como criterio de distribución de recursos en la salud índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Tópicos (México)

versión impresa ISSN 0188-6649

Resumen

GARCIA RAMIREZ, Eduardo. I Do Not Exist. Problems for Dynamic Semantics. Tópicos (México) [online]. 2019, n.56, pp.393-414. ISSN 0188-6649.  https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i56.1012.

According to dynamic semantics, what is said by an utterance of a sentence is determined by how the common ground is affected by the acceptance of such utterance. It has been claimed that dynamic semantics offers an account of what is said by an utterance in a context that excels that of traditional static semantics. Assertions of negative existential constructions, of the form ‘X does not exist’, are a case in point. These assertions traditionally pose a problem for philosophers of language. A recent proposal, owed to Clapp (2008), argues that static semantics is unable to solve the problem and offers a dynamic semantics account that promises to succeed. In this paper I want to challenge this account and, more generally, the scope of the dynamic semantics framework. I will offer a counterexample, inspired by “answering machine” uses of indexical and demonstrative expressions, to show how dynamic semantics fails. I conclude by considering the merits of both static and dynamic accounts.

Palabras llave : negative existential constructions; what is said; presuppositions; accommodation; correction.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )