SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.37 número2Variabilidad de δ13C y δ15N en suelo y hojarasca de cacao en El Oro, EcuadorAnálisis de residuos de plaguicidas en el agua superficial de la cuenca del Río Ayuquila-Armería, México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Terra Latinoamericana

versión On-line ISSN 2395-8030versión impresa ISSN 0187-5779

Resumen

LOPEZ AVENDANO, Jesús Enrique et al. Use of FAO-56 and scintillometer to estimate evapotranspiration of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and its components: soil evaporation and plant transpiration. Terra Latinoam [online]. 2019, vol.37, n.2, pp.141-150. ISSN 2395-8030.  https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v37i2.393.

Estimating evapotranspiration (ETc) is essential for water planning and management in agricultural areas, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions; ETc partitioning into soil evaporation (E) and plant transpiration (T) would allow the use of more efficient water management strategies. The aims of the present study were to estimate daily evapotranspiration of sorghum and its components, using the FAO-56 method with the dual crop coefficient (dual Kc) approach and scintillometer method, and to determine the single crop coefficient (Kc) and basal crop coefficient (Kcb) values for different development seasons. Results have shown that using the dual Kc approach allows reasonable simulation of ETc in comparison to values estimated using the scintillometer method. ETc estimated with both methods was 413.8 and 406.3 mm, respectively, resulting in a 1.8% overestimation for FAO-56. Root mean square error (RMSE) was 0.584 mm d-1 and Willmott’s agreement coefficient (d) was 0.91. Evaporation estimated with FAO-56 was 17.1% of ETc, while with the scintillometer it was 21.6% of ETc. The RMSE of the estimated E values was 0.397 mm d-1 and d = 0.94, while, when comparing T, calculated RMSE was 0.371 mm d-1 and d = 0.98. Kc values estimated with the FAO-56 method were 0.68, 1.06 and 0.4 for initial, middle and end season of the crop, while for the scintillometer, values were 0.75, 0.94 and 0.41, respectively.

Palabras llave : surface energy balance; dual crop coefficient; scintillometry; Culiacan Valley.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )