SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 issue124Hydropolitics in Candelaria: From the Analysis of the Basin to the Study of Interactions between River and Riverside Society author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Relaciones. Estudios de historia y sociedad

On-line version ISSN 2448-7554Print version ISSN 0185-3929

Abstract

GUTIERREZ CHAM, Gerardo. Fallacious Argumentation in Two Religious Newspapers in Jalisco. 19th Century. Relac. Estud. hist. soc. [online]. 2010, vol.31, n.124, pp.227-246. ISSN 2448-7554.

This study is part of a research project on argumentative strategies in religious discourse in a context of confrontation and debate. The corpus studied consists of texts from 1874 that appeared in two newspapers in Jalisco which published religious propaganda: one Catholic: La Religión y la Sociedad, ("Religion and Society"), the other Christian Reform: La Lanza de San Baltasar ("St. Balthazar's Lance"). Interest centers on the contrasting perspectives of a polarized confrontation that shows the pragmatic-discursive functioning of fallacious arguments that served as special speech acts designed to "attack" or "defend". The theoretical basis is the pragma-dialectic model of argumentative fallacies (Grooten-dorst 2003; Anscombre and Ducrot 1988; Hamblin 1970) that shows how the ideological defense of religious practices and beliefs could be strengthened from the "peripheries" of rationality through the predominance of fallacious arguments; such that the topics under discussion passed to a second plane of importance.

Keywords : discourse; press; religious; argumentation; fallacies.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License