SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 issue4Factors associated with retention in faith-based drug treatment centers in the Mexican-American borderEffectiveness of augmented Individual Placement and Support interventions for competitive employment in people with schizophrenia: Systematic review and meta-analysis author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Salud mental

Print version ISSN 0185-3325

Abstract

AGUILAR-NAVARRO, Sara G. et al. Validation of the Clock Drawing Test Scoring Method in older adults with neurocognitive disorder. Salud Ment [online]. 2018, vol.41, n.4, pp.179-186. ISSN 0185-3325.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2018.026.

Introduction:

The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a widely used instrument for identifying neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) in older adults. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine the best scoring method, since current quantitative methods involve the assignment of numerical values, while qualitative ones do not allow for objectivity in the diagnosis. Parsey & Schmitter-Edgecombe (2011) proposed a scoring scheme which, in addition to providing a score of the patient’s performance, permits error analysis, thereby making it possible to identify potential underlying cognitive difficulties.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to validate the CDT scoring scheme proposed by Parsey & Schmitter-Edgecombe (2011) for screening for NCDs in Mexican older adults.

Method:

There were 167 participants: 58 cognitively healthy subjects (CH), 52 with mild neurocognitive disorder (mild-NCD), and 57 with major neurocognitive disorder (major-NCD).The CDT scoring method was compared with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Spanish (MoCA-S). Inter- and intra-observer reliability and construct validity were determined and the sensitivity and specificity of this method were calculated.

Results:

The X - age was 75 years (SD ± 8 years) and the X - educational attainment was 10.7 years (SD ± 5.2 years). Internal reliability was .750, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of .774. The cut-off point for the CDT in mild-NCD was 14 points (sensitivity: 40%, specificity: 70%) and 12 points for major-NCD (sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 95%).The most frequent errors in the CDT were: graphic, conceptual, spatial, and/or planning difficulties.

Discussion and conclusion:

This method makes it possibly to quickly and easily explore the cognitive status of the patient. It contains ideal psychometric properties for the detection of patients with major-NCD, in addition to offering the possibility of analyzing performance errors and underlying cognitive difficulties.

Keywords : Neurocognitive disorder; Clock Test; screening; older adult.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )