SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 issue1Critique and platonic use of the sophistical exegesis applied to traditional myths and poemsPossible lines of argument in the account according to the Greek authors of Progymnásmata author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Nova tellus

Print version ISSN 0185-3058

Abstract

ROSSI, Gabriela. On the Aristotelian treatment of two deceitful arguments: Composition and Division. Nova tellus [online]. 2011, vol.29, n.1, pp.41-74. ISSN 0185-3058.

This paper deals with the Aristotelian treatment of two fallacies or deceitful arguments: Composition and Division. First I examine the way in which Aristotle presents these arguments in the Sophistic Refutations (SE), and secondly, I study the presentation of Rhetoric (Rh.), II, 24. This analysis makes clear that in each writing, "Composition" and "Division" are actually referred to arguments with a completely different structure. To this extent, Composition and Division are presented as a particularly clear example of the fact that the treatment of fallacies in Rh. II, 24 is not a mere repetition of what had been studied in SE, but implies a strong innovation, partly dependent on the particular subject matter of rhetorical argumentation.

Keywords : Fallacies; Rhetoric; Dialectic; Argumentation.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License