SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.59 issue3Variables associated with disordered eating behaviors among freshman students from Mexico CityHealth education trough the development of scientific skills in Chilean schools author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Salud Pública de México

Print version ISSN 0036-3634

Abstract

ORTIZ-PANOZO, Eduardo et al. Validity of self-reported anthropometry in adult Mexican women. Salud pública Méx [online]. 2017, vol.59, n.3, pp.266-275. ISSN 0036-3634.  https://doi.org/10.21149/7860.

Objective:

To compare direct and self-reported anthropometry in Mexican women.

Materials and methods:

Women aged 30-72 years, participating in the Mexican Teachers’ Cohort, completed a questionnaire with their anthropometric data in 2006-2008. After eleven months (median time), technicians performed anthropometry in 3756 participants. We calculated correlations and multivariable-adjusted mean differences between direct and self-reported anthropometric measures.

Results:

Correlations between direct and self-reported anthropometric measures ranged from 0.78 (waist circumference) to 0.93 (weight). On average, women over-reported their height by 2.2 cm and underreported their weight, body mass index (BMI) and waist and hip circumferences by 1.3 kg, 1.3 kg/m2, 1.8 cm and 1.9 cm, respectively. Errors in self-reported anthropometry increased with rising measured BMI and were also independently associated with age, education and socioeconomic status.

Conclusion:

Self-reported anthropometry is sufficiently valid for epidemiological purposes in adult Mexican women. Errors in self-reported anthropometry might result in underestimation of the prevalence of overweight and obesity.

Keywords : validity of tests; anthropometry; self report; women; Mexico.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )