SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.50 número150La comicidad como perjuicio de sujetos intencionales índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Crítica (México, D.F.)

versão impressa ISSN 0011-1503

Resumo

VIDAL, Javier. Reply to Sebastián: in Defense of the Conscious Nature of First-Person Beliefs. Crítica (Méx., D.F.) [online]. 2018, vol.50, n.150, pp.65-89.  Epub 12-Maio-2020. ISSN 0011-1503.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2018.16.

In this journal, I argued for the conscious nature of first-person beliefs (2014). In a more recent paper, Miguel Ángel Sebastián (2017) tried to show that such an argument is unsound. Here I address his three core criticisms. Firstly, I maintain that my argument is valid if to know a first-person belief consists in believing one has it. Likewise, I defend that no damaging infinite regression of conscious higher-order beliefs is involved. Further, I argue that the notion of consciousness at stake is the relevant notion for discussion about the nature of consciousness and the unconscious. Finally, I examine the justification for the principle (SC*) in order to show that it does not beg the question.

Palavras-chave : consciousness; accessibility; higher-order belief; unconscious belief; cognitive dynamics.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )