SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.55Aspectos del desarrollo in vitro de Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vanillae ante un gradiente térmicoTalaromyces oaxaquensis sp. nov. sección Talaromyces (Trichocomaceae, Eurotiales) aislada de pseudotallos de plantas de plátano en México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Scientia fungorum

versión On-line ISSN 2594-1321

Sci. fungorum vol.55  Xalapa  2024  Epub 08-Ago-2025

https://doi.org/10.33885/sf.2024.55.1466 

Artículos científicos originales

Production of the “maguey mushroom” Pleurotus agaves on formulated substrates

Producción del “hongo del maguey” Pleurotus agaves en sustratos formulados

Margarita González-Tijera1  3 

Gerardo Mata2  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-7003

Ángel Trigos-Landa3 

Dulce Salmones2 

1DTECNM, Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Xalapa. Xalapa, Veracruz, México.

2Red Manejo Biotecnológico de Recursos. Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Xalapa, Veracruz, México.

3Centro de Investigación en Micología Aplicada, Universidad Veracruzana. Xalapa, Veracruz, México.


Abstract

Background:

Pleurotus agaves is a mushroom that grows wild on the agave plant and is consumed by rural populations in some regions of Mexico.

Objective:

To compare biological efficiencies (BEs) and basidiome sizes between the wild strain of P. agaves (IE-771) and a commercial strain of Pleurotus pulmonarius (IE-115).

Method:

The strains were cultivated in agave leaves mixed with barley straw (M) and barley straw alone (S), used as a control substrate. The fiber (lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose) content of the substrates during the crop cycles was analyzed.

Results and conclusions:

The BEs were 42.1 % (S) and 64.6 % (M) for IE-771 and 37.3 % (S) and 71.3 (M) for IE-115, with statistical differences found between the substrates, but not between the strains. Crop cycles were longer in the P. agaves strain. IE-771 presented pileus sizes Ø from ≤ 4.9 to 19.9 cm on substrate S and from ≤ 4.9 to ≥ 20 cm on substrate M, whereas IE-115 presented sizes from ≤ 4.9 to 14.9 cm in both substrates. A greater decrease in polysaccharide compounds in the substrates was associated with the incubation stage. Due to its acceptable morphological characteristics, P. agaves strain could be suitable for commercial cultivation.

Keywords: biological efficiency; fiber degradation; maguey leaves; mushroom cultivation; oyster mushrooms

Resumen

Antecedentes:

Pleurotus agaves es un hongo comestible que crece silvestre en plantas de maguey y es consumido en zonas rurales de México.

Objetivo:

comparar las eficiencias biológicas (EB´s) y tamaño de basidiomas de una cepa silvestre de P. agaves (IE-771) y otra comercial de Pleurotus pulmonarius (IE-115).

Método:

las cepas se cultivaron en hojas de maguey mezcladas con paja de cebada (M) utilizando como control paja de cebada (S). Se analizó el contenido de fibra (lignina, celulosa, hemicelulosa) de los sustratos durante el ciclo de cultivo.

Resultados y conclusiones:

las EB´s de la cepa IE-771 fueron 42.1 % (S) y 64.6 % (M) y para la IE-115 de 37.3 % (S) y 71.3 % (M), determinándose diferencias significativas entre los sustratos, pero no entre las cepas. Los ciclos de cultivo fueron más largos en la cepa de P. agaves. La IE-771 presentó diámetros de píleos de ≤ 4.9 a 19.9 cm en S y de ≤ 4.9 a ≥ 20 cm en el sustrato M; mientras que la IE-115 de ≤ 4.9 a 14.9 cm, en ambos sustratos. Una mayor disminución del contenido de polisacáridos en los sustratos estuvo asociada a la incubación. Pleurotus agaves podría ser cultivada comercialmente.

Palabras clave: cultivo de hongos; degradación de fibra; eficiencia biológica; hojas de maguey; setas

Introduction

Members of the genus Pleurotus are known as “oyster mushrooms”. They are xilophagous fungi with a pleurotoid habit, attached laterally to the substrate by a stem. Global production of oyster mushrooms has increased significantly in recent years and accounts for more than 19 % of the production of edible mushrooms worldwide (Royse and Sanchez 2017). Among the commercially cultivated species of Pleurotus, only P. ostreatus (Jacq.: Fr.) P. Kumm., P. pulmonarius (Fr.) Quél. and P. djamor (Rumph.: Fr.) Boedijn are cultivated in Mexico (Salmones et al. 2022). However, other wild species of the genus could potentially be incorporated into the national mushroom production (Salmones and Mata 2017). Among the wild species of Pleurotus that have long been consumed in Mexico is P. agaves Dennis, a mushroom from xerophytic temperate regions known as “the maguey mushroom”, which grows among the fleshy and dead leaves of the agave plant (Camacho et al. 2012). These authors also considered that the correct species name should be P. opuntiae (Durieu & Lév.) Sacc. However, the cultivation of Pleurotus strains isolated from maguey plants has created discussion regarding the possible existence of at least two or three species: P. dryinus (Pers.) P. Kumm, P. agaves, or P. opuntiae (Huerta et al. 2010, González de la Tijera 2014, Salmones et al. 2017). Pleurotus dryinus differs from other species of the genus by presenting a membranous veil at the pileus margin or by forming an annular zone on the stem (Guzmán, 2000), whereas P. opuntiae is restricted to the Mediterranean area and P. agaves is a phylogenetically distinct species according to Zervakis et al. (2019).

Maguey or agave plants have been collected and used in Mexico since pre-Hispanic times, constituting a means of subsistence complementary to the cultivation of cereals (Álvarez-Ríos et al. 2020). Their more recognized uses include the production of alcoholic beverages such as tequila (Agave tequilana Weber), mezcal (Agave spp.), and pulque (A. salmiana Otto ex Salm.) (Zizumbo-Villarreal et al. 2013). Production of the latter beverage peaked in the 19th century (Hinke 2007). However, by the middle of the 20th century, the consumption of pulque had been replaced by beer, which reduced the number of hectares under cultivation from 30,000 (1930) to 11,000 (2018) (Álvarez-Ríos et al. 2020). For this reason, the cultivation of maguey for pulque practically ceased, causing the loss of the natural habitat of the maguey mushroom. Given this situation, the isolation and preservation of wild material in biological collections is a strategy for conserving its genetic resources (Mata and Salmones 2021). In addition, the cultivation of this fungus at an experimental level allows us to identify its biodegradative characteristics and determine the feasibility of its commercial production.

On the other hand, in a survey conducted among consumers of edible mushrooms, the maguey mushroom, cited as its synonym P. opuntiae, was recognized among the 16 most utilized species in Mexican gastronomy (Molina-Castillo et al. 2023), along with the genera Ramaria, Boletus, Lyophyllum, Morchella, Lactarius, Amanita, and Russula in agreement with Pérez-Moreno et al. (2021).

In the mushroom cultivation process, the stage of selection and preparation of the substrate is critical since it is carried out to provide the physical and chemical characteristics suitable for its colonization and biological selectivity that allow the mushroom to grow with an advantage over its various competitors. In the case of the Pleurotus genus, these mushrooms are easily adapted to different lignocellulosic materials, due to their ability to degrade them. This characteristic is based on the multienzyme system that they produce, including oxidases and hydrolases capable of attacking cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin fractions (Adebayo and Martínez Carrera 2015, Mata et al. 2017).

The objective of this study is to utilize the cultivation of P. agaves in a conventional substrate (barley straw) mixed with maguey leaf residues to compare its biological efficiency (BE) with a commercial strain of P. pulmonarius cultivated under the same conditions and to identify productivity characteristics. Furthermore, the variation of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin contents in the substrates colonized by P. agaves was quantified to determine the biodegradative capacity of the strain.

Materials and methods

Strains

Two strains of Pleurotus were studied: one wild variety collected in a pulque maguey field in the region of Alchichica, Puebla, Mexico (19° 24’ N y 97° 23’ W), isolated in the laboratory, registered as IE-771 in the Strain Collection of the Institute of Ecology, Xalapa, Mexico, and identified as P. agaves (Mata et al. 2012). The other is a commercial P. pulmonarius strain widely used in Mexico and registered as IE-115 in the same mushroom collection.

For this study, strain IE-115 was cultured in a potato dextrose agar (PDA, Bioxon) culture medium, while IE771 was cultivated in PDA supplemented with wheat extract (Mata and Salmones, 2021). Both strains were incubated at 28 °C in darkness.

Spawn production

The spawn was prepared using sorghum seeds (Sorghum vulgare Pers.). For strain IE-771, 50 g of sorghum seeds were placed in glass jars with 40 ml of water and sterilized for one hour at 121 °C. For strain IE-115, the sorghum grains were hydrated for 24 h, and then 200 g of seeds were placed in low-density plastic bags and sterilized for 1 h at 121 °C and 103.4 KPa (Guzmán et al. 2013). Following sterilization, 1 cm2 of the mycelium of each strain, cultivated in culture medium, was placed on the sterile sorghum, and incubated at 28 °C in darkness until the mycelium completely covered the seeds (30 d for strain IE-771 and 15 d for IE-115). This spawn was called the primary spawn. The secondary spawn was prepared under identical conditions for both strains; placing 175 g of sorghum seeds hydrated in low-density plastic bags and sterilizing for 1 h at 121 °C, then inoculating each strain with 25 g of the primary spawn.

Substrate and culture preparation

The maguey leaves were collected in Alchichica, Puebla, Mexico, and sun-dried for transportation to and storage in the laboratory. To obtain the maguey substrate, sun-dried maguey leaves were rewetted for 24 h and maintained for 7 d forming a pile of 70 cm in height covered with plastic to maintain values of temperature and humidity that favored the fermentation process. To promote homogeneous conditions in the pile, the materials were removed daily (Mata and Torres-Hernández 2008). Once the fiber of the maguey leaves had softened, these were chopped into fragments of 5 to 10 cm in length using a fodder cutter. Barley straw was previously chopped, rewetted for 24 h, and fermented for 3 d at ambient temperature. This substrate, defined as S, presented a moisture content of 75 %.

Fermented maguey leaves and barley straw were mixed at a 1:1 proportion (w/w) to produce substrate M. This substrate reached a final moisture content of 80 %. The selection of days of fermentation and the combination ratio between maguey leaves and barley straw were determined by preliminary tests (data not presented). Both substrates were pasteurized using a steam tunnel of 3.5 m3, with a constant steam flow of 276 Kpa, maintaining a constant compost temperature of 65 °C for 6 h (Velázquez-Cedeño et al. 2006), then left to cool to ambient temperature. Pasteurized substrates were then placed in polythene bags (60 x 40 cm), manually mixing the substrate with the secondary spawn at 5 % (w/w), until reaching a moist weight of 4 kg in each bag. Inoculated samples were incubated in darkness at 26±2 °C. On the second day of incubation, the plastic bags were perforated to allow gaseous exchange, 12 cross perforations (2 cm in length) were made per bag, 4 on each face and 2 on each side. At the end of the incubation period, which was marked by the appearance of the primordia, the samples were transferred to a production room under conditions of periods of light (350 Lux) and darkness of 12/12 h, with a temperature of 21±2 °C, following the recommendation of Barrales and Mata (2016), and a relative humidity of 80-85 %. In the case of samples corresponding to the strain IE-771, it was necessary to carefully fragment the mycelium after the first harvest to make a hole in the center of the samples, without reaching the base of the bag, which allowed improved internal hydration of the samples to obtain the following harvests.

The harvested sporophores were weighed and measured manually. They were categorized into the following pileus diameter size groups: G1= ≤ 4.9 cm; G2 = 5.0-9.9 cm; G3 = 10.0-14.9 cm; G4 = 15.0-19.9 cm and G5 ≥ 20 cm (Salmones et al. 2020). Percentages per size group were obtained by dividing the number of sporophores in each size group by the total number in all size groups and multiplying by 100, while the average weight of the mushrooms in each group was obtained by dividing the total weight in each group by the number of sporophores in that group. Productivity was evaluated over three flushes in each treatment and expressed as biological efficiency (BE %) = percentage ratio of the fresh weight of harvested mushrooms over the dry weight of the substrate (Royse et al. 2004).

Experimental design

The following treatments were used: a 1:1 mixture of barley straw and maguey leaves (M) and barley straw alone (S). Both substrates were inoculated with the strains IE-115 and IE-771, with 10 replicates utilized per strain. The arrangement in the production area was a completely random design, with 40 units placed at three levels on three shelves.

Data analysis

Data related to pileus size group and treatment was converted to proportions and the values arcsin square-root transformed (Zar 1999). These data were analyzed with a nested analysis of variance using the General Linear Model (GLM) process, the declaration LSMEANS Statement, and the PDIFF option of SAS, version 2003. The BE data obtained were subjected to an analysis of variance with a completely random design. When significant differences were detected, means were compared using Tukey´s multiple range test with a significance level of 0.05 %.

Substrate fiber analysis

Variation in the cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin contents was determined in the substrates (S and M) used for the fructification of Pleurotus agaves before inoculation of the fungus (T1), at the end of the incubation stage (T2), and after the final flush of mushrooms (T3). Samples of approximately 250 g were extracted from each bag (T1, T2, and T3), dried at 65 °C for 24 h, and ground in a blender. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were determined, as well as acid detergent lignin (with sulfuric acid at 72 %), according to Van Soest et al. (1991), using the Ankom Fiber Analyzer, model 200/220. NDF fraction was determined by adding ND solution (water/sodium lauril, sulfate/EDTA/triethylene, glycol/sodium, borate/sodium phosphate) and ADF with water/sulfuric acid/cetyltrimethylammonium bromide solution. Cellulose content was directly estimated from ADF-lignin. Hemicellulose was calculated as NDF-ADF. All samples were analyzed in triplicate.

Results and discusión

Production of carpophores

During the incubation period, mycelia covered the entire surface of the substrates between 21 to 39 days, and the first flushes were harvested between 27.9 (IE115, S substrate) to 43.1 (IE-771, M substrate) days of cultivation. Two or three flushes were obtained from different treatments (Table 1). During the cultivation of P. agaves in both substrates and after the first flush, the samples gave no indication of a second flush. In an attempt to activate production, the mycelium in the bags was partially broken for better rehydration of the samples. Rodríguez-Estrada et al. (2009) reported that certain substrates must be fragmented following the first flush and Guzmán et al. (2013) cited the formation of a pseudosclerotium in some strains of Pleurotus. This is the case with P. agaves, after the manipulations of the mycelium and substrate carried out in this study, primordia of the second and third flushes were obtained. The development and morphology of the mature fruiting bodies produced by both strains on the different flushes were typical characteristics of the genus Pleurotus (Figure 1).

Table 1 Comparison of P. pulmonarius (IE-115) and P. agaves (IE-771) production parameters in the different treatments 

Treatments Average of fresh mushroom weight (g) Average of days since inoculation
Strain Substrate Flushes Total BE % Flushes
1st 2nd 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd
IE-115 S 209.6* 57.1 36.2 302.9 37.3 a** 27.9 40 61
M 385.4 106.3 63.9 555.6 71.3 b 30.6 49.7 65.6
IE-771 S 191.0 121.2 75.0 342.2 42.1 a 44.5 124.9 135.2
M 186.9 201.7 191.6 503.6 64.6 b 43.1 122.4 175.4

*X ten samples.

**Values followed by different letters within a column are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 (HSD Tukey’s test). S: barley straw. M: maguey leaves-barley straw 1:1.

Figure 1 Sporophore of Pleurotus agaves, class G5 (more than 20 cm), obtained in agave leaves mixed with barley straw (substrate M). 

Average fresh mushroom production varied from 302.9 g (IE-115, S) to 555.6 g (IE-115, M) per sample. The strains cultivated on the mixture of maguey leaves and barley straw had the highest production, reaching BE averages of 71.3 % (IE-115) and 64.6 % (IE-771) (Table 1). The BE of the three flushes reported for P. pulmonarius in barley straw (S) is within the range of values recorded by Gaitán-Hernández et al. (2009) in four flushes, even in the supplemented substrates (Vogel and Salmones 2000) (in two flushes). The BE values found in this study did not differ from those reported for P. pulmonarius in other substrates (Philippoussis 2009, De Siqueira et al. 2012, Adebayo et al. 2014, Vega and Franco 2013, Abdulgani et al. 2017, Picornell et al. 2017). Sánchez et al. (2002) reported a BE of 38.3 for the strain IE-115 (one flush) in grape skins, which is comparable to our finding in barley straw for the same strain. Nevertheless, our results are lower than those reported by Salmones et al. (2020) in barley straw and Bernabé-González et al. (2004), who reported three flushes using maguey bagasse from Agave cupreata (sourced from the mezcal industry) with and without rice straw as a substrate. Regarding the cultivation of P. agaves, Barrales and Mata (2016) reported biological efficiencies of P. agaves (~ P. opuntiae) strains in barley straw combined with sugarcane bagasse, with and without a 7-day fermentation process, ranging from 86.1 to 105.2 %, and of P. pulmonarius at greater than 230 %. Portilla-Segura et al. (2019) cultivated P. agaves (cited as P. opuntiae) in maguey leaves alone or combined with wheat straw, corn cobs, and bean straw, reaching biological efficiencies of between 47.92 to 89.81 % and observing that formulations containing maguey residues favored higher yields. This has been reported for other commercial species of the genus. Pleurotus ostreatus cultivated in A. salmiana residues has presented biological efficiencies from 11 to 70 % (Heredia Solís et al. 2014, España Rodríguez et al. 2021) and P. djamor, a pantropical species, from 58.3 to 70.56 % (Velázquez de Lucio et al. 2022).

Table 1 shows that BE values were greater in the 1:1 maguey leaves-barley straw mixture than those reported in barley straw alone, in both P. pulmonarius and P. agaves, and that no significant differences exist between the BE values of these species in substrate M. Several studies have demonstrated that BE is directly associated with the strain used, the species, substrates, and environmental conditions of the cultivation (Lechner and Albertó 2011, Dundar et al. 2009, Philippoussis 2009).

In addition to the BE, time of production is an important parameter for the producers since they face problems such as limited space in cultivation chambers and the risk of pests and contaminants for prolonged periods (Gaitán-Hernández et al. 2009). The time from inoculation to the first flush was 27.9-30.6 d for P. pulmonarius and there was approximately a twoweek period between the first and second flushes and between the second and third flushes, which is within the range reported for this species (Salmones et al. 2020, Bernabé-González et al. 2004) (Table 1). More time was required to produce P. agaves than for the commercial strain. From inoculation to the first flush took 43.1-44.5 d (~13 d more than in the commercial strain), and the second flush was produced 80 d after the first flush, a period that was sufficient to produce three flushes in P. ostreatus. Between the first and second flush, to activate the production of P. agaves, the substrate and mycelium were manipulated once, as described previously, thereafter the third flush occurred after 11 d in S and 51 d in M.

The combination and/or supplementation of substrates with C and N sources is recommended to increase productivity in the Pleurotus spp. cultivation process (Picornell et al. 2017). The mixture of maguey leaves and barley straw may cause an increased C/N ratio on the substrate, and this increases the BEs (Dundar et al. 2009). In addition to its nutritional contribution, adding barley straw improves the rheological characteristics of the maguey leaves, avoiding compression and bonding. Barley straw also increases water retention and provides enough space for the spawn.

Pileus size is a quality parameter used by mushroom growers to classify their products. Figure 2 shows the percentage per size category recorded in the two strains used in this study. The best-represented group was G2, corresponding to between 49.4 (IE-771, M substrate) and 58.7 % (IE-115, S substrate) of the total harvested production. The second position corresponded to G1 for IE-115 and to G3 for IE-771. The latter strain also produced basidiomes of groups 4 (S and M) and 5 (S). In general, both strains cultivated on M substrate developed the largest pileus sizes. These results are comparable to those of Lechner and Albertó (2011), who studied the pileus diameter of two species of Pleurotus (P. pulmonarius and P. albidus), using the same classification criteria utilized in this study. Moreover, Gaitán-Hernández et al. (2009) reported that the most frequent size in P. pulmonarius cultivated in fermented and non-fermented barley straw was G2, which agrees with the findings of this study, and reported that G3 was the second most frequent size class. These results also coincide with Vega and Franco (2013), who cultivated P. pulmonarius in corn stover and corncob. On the other hand, Salmones et al. (2020), who cultivated three parental strains and forty-eight progeny strains of P. pulmonarius in barley straw, reported that the largest group was G1 (62.5 and 58.3 %, respectively), followed by G2 (22.6. and 23.1 %, respectively) and G3 (9.9 and 15.4 %, respectively). In the present study, the second most frequent size class was G1 in P. pulmonarius and G3 in P. agaves, and this is the first time that cap diameter sizes have been reported for a cultivated strain of this species.

Figure 2 Percentage of sporophores by size category obtained in both formulations, with the strains IE-115 (Pleurotus pulmonarius) and IE-771 (P. agaves). 

Regarding the analysis of the weight of the mushrooms grouped by pileus size, it was observed that the variation between the values depended more on the strain than on the substrate (Table 2). In general, the strain IE-771 presented fruiting bodies with a higher average weight than IE-115 in the different culture conditions, although only the samples of P. agaves (G3) cultivated in the substrate M were statistically different from those of P. pulmonarius (G3), in both substrates. It is important to note that the recorded weights of the fructifications included the stipe so the variability of the weight also depended on robustness. This characteristic of IE-771 of presenting a higher average weight of basidiomes in the different size groups should be corroborated with greater variability of strains and/or substrates since it could be of interest for its commercial cultivation.

Table 2 Average weight (g) of Pleurotus pulmonarius and P. agaves basidiomes grouped by pileus diameter 

Strain Substrate Size categories
G1* G2 G3 G4 G5
IE-115 S** 3.5(0.9)ab*** 16.3(3.2)abc 40.5(11.1)de
M 3.6(0.7)a 14.9(2.9)abc 39.6(5.7)d
IE-771 S 7.5(5.2)ab 20.2(6.5)bc 54.4(16.3)def 97.3(26.2)g
M 9.2(5.6)ab 25.6(4.0)cde 58.5(13.1)f 105.6(27.6)g 181.1(25.6)h

*Pileus diameter groups: G1 = ≤ 4.9 cm. G2 = 5 to 9.9 cm. G3 = 10 to 14.9 cm. G4 = 15 to 19.9 cm and G5 = ≥ 20 cm.

**S: Barely straw. M: Maguey leaves-barley straw 1:1.

***Values followed by different letters within a column are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 (HSD Tukey’s test).

Although the results of the statistical analysis do not indicate significant differences between the substrates, the values in Table 2 show an increase in the average weights of the fruiting bodies of strain IE-771 when grown in the M substrate.

Substrate fiber content

Consumption of the main fiber components of the two substrates during P. agaves cultivation is presented in Table 3. By the end of the incubation period, the polysaccharide content of the substrates had been consumed by the mycelia, and the consumption was noticeable after the third harvest. Degradation varied between times and substrates. In particular, IE771 cultivated in barley straw (S) efficiently degraded cellulose and lignin throughout the incubation period and hemicellulose after the third harvest, while the samples grown on M substrate were characterized by high consumption of all fractions (cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin) during the incubation period. In general, a greater decrease in lignocellulosic compounds was observed for barley straw samples alone than when barley straw was combined with maguey leaves.

Table 3 Variations of the content (%) of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin in the substrates during the cultivation of Pleurotus agaves 

Stage Barley straw (S) Maguey leaves-barley straw 1:1(M)
Cellulose Hemicellulose Lignin Cellulose Hemicellulose Lignin
T1* 29.95(0.78)** 39.83(0.69) 4.10(0.22) 17.69(0.62) 23.91(0.40) 6.77(0.74)
T2 20.78(0.28) 32.46(0.42) 2.09(0.26) 14.58(0.23) 20.47(0.19) 3.47(0.31)
T3 15.17(0.54) 17.18(0.21) 2.67(0.48) 13.28(0.56) 21.52(0.57) 3.33(0.26)

*T1: prior to inoculation. T2: ending incubation period. T3: after the last flush of mushrooms.

**: X(SD)

The degradation of lignocellulosic fractions by the genus Pleurotus depends on the production and secretion of hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes such as cellulases, hemicellulases, and ligninases (Mata et al. 2017). Comparing the initial composition (T1) of the formulations used in our study, Table 3 shows a higher proportion of cellulose and hemicellulose in substrate S, while lignin was present in a higher proportion in substrate M. We found in both substrates that the degradation of cellulose is greater during the incubation period (T2) than during fructification. This aligns with that reported by Mata and Torres-Hernández (2008) for P. ostreatus in barley straw supplemented with coffee pulp or peat. However, contrary to the findings of these authors, we found that degradation of hemicellulose was greater during fructification in fermented barley straw. This finding has also been reported by Salmones et al. (2005), who cultivated P. ostreatus and P. pulmonarius in wheat straw and coffee pulp; among the three fractions evaluated, cellulose and hemicellulose were the most degraded during the selective growth of the fruiting bodies since they provide the necessary nutrients for their development and the variation in the decrease depends on the sugars and other carbon sources available. Regarding lignin, species of the genus Pleurotus are known to selectively degrade lignin and acquire other readily available sources of carbon (Mata et al. 2017). The consumption of lignin recorded during the incubation period (T2) in our study, reached approximately 50 % in both substrates but was practically zero during fructification (T3). These results align with those reported by Pandey and Singh (2014), who found a high degradation of lignin from the incubation period to the formation of primordia. However, the degradation of lignocellulose can vary during the different stages of the crop cycle since it is affected by various factors such as the enzymatic activity of the fungus, availability of O2 in the substrate, composition, and condition of the substrate, interaction between mycelium and substrate, strain genotype, environmental conditions, and the morphogenetic status of the cultivation (Baldrian et al. 2005, Sherief et al. 2010).

The chemical composition of a substrate can influence the nutritional and organoleptic properties of the mushroom (Rodríguez-Estrada et al. 2009; Vlasenko and Kuznetsova 2020). Aerobic fermentation of the straw for short periods improves adequate mycelial colonization since fungistatic bacterial communities increase the competitive ability of Pleurotus against its main antagonist Trichoderma spp. (Velázquez-Cedeño et al. 2006). Regarding the maguey leaves, fermentation allowed softening of the fiber, resulting in a better and more manageable consistency for mixing with the fungus spawn (Mata and Torres-Hernández 2008). Guzmán-Dávalos et al. (1987) used the “piña” or heart of the Agave tequilana (a waste product of the tequila industry) to cultivate P. ostreatus, obtaining a BE of 60.2 %. This value increased to 96.4 % when the tequila industry waste was mixed with straw. These authors concluded that a more selective substrate had been obtained and that contamination by molds had been avoided (Soto-Velazco et al. 1989). This was observed in our study since no mold contamination was detected in the samples and only one sample had to be discarded due to insect larvae contamination.

In conclusion, maguey mushrooms are highly appreciated in rural areas of central Mexico, and they have been consumed in various traditional dishes such as soups, “quesadillas” or “guisados” (Minerva Mendoza, personal communication). The P. agaves strain cultivated in this study presented size and color characteristics that made it suitable for introduction to the market.

This study demonstrated that maguey leaves and barley straw, alone or mixed, could be used as substrates in the cultivation of P. agaves. The selection of the former substrate was based on the origin of the strain studied, but the most viable option is to utilize grass straw. Given its morphological and cultivation characteristics, P. agaves could compete in the market with other commercial species from temperate environments, such as P. ostreatus and P. pulmonarius. The isolation and cultivation of wild genetic material from various regions of the country should therefore be continued and a program of selection and improvement of the commercial characteristics of the species should be initiated.

Acknowledgements

Grateful thanks go to the authorities of the Universidad Veracruzana and the Instituto de Ecología, A.C. for the support they provided to this study. González-Tijera is grateful to the Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías (CONAHCYT) for funding. Thanks to Minerva Mendoza for providing the pulque maguey leaves for preparing the substrates and for the donation of fungi to isolate the P. agaves strain. We acknowledge the support of Dulce Murrieta Hernández and Carlos Ortega Sánchez (INECOL) for cultivation of the mushroom.

References

Abdulgani R, Lau CC, Abdullah N, Vikineswary S. 2017. Morphological and molecular characterization of Pleurotus pulmonarius hybrids with improved sporophore features and higher biological efficacy. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 19, 707-712. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0343 [ Links ]

Adebayo EA, Alao MB, Olatunbosum OO, Omoleye EO, Omisakin OB. 2014. Yield evaluation of Pleurotus pulmonarius (Oyster mushroom) on different agricultural wastes and various grains for spawn production. IFE Journal of Science 16(3), 475-480. [ Links ]

Adebayo EA, Martínez-Carrera D. 2015. Oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus) are useful for utilizing lignocellulosic biomass. African Journal of Biotechnology 14(1), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2014.14249 [ Links ]

Álvarez-Ríos GD, Figueredo Urbina CJ, Casas A. 2020. Sistemas de manejo de maguey pulquero en México. Etnobiología 18(2), 3-23. [ Links ]

Baldrian P, Valaskova V, Merhautová V, Gabriel J. 2005. Degradation of lignocellulose by Pleurotus ostreatus in the presence of copper, manganese, lead and zinc. Research in Microbiology 156, 670-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2005.03.007 [ Links ]

Barrales M, Mata G. 2016. Selección de cepas nativas del hongo de maguey (Pleurotus opuntiae) y evaluación de su producción en sustratos fermentados. Interciencia 41(5), 346-352. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/339/33945552010.pdfLinks ]

Bernabé-González T, Cayetano-Catarino M, Adán-Díaz A, Torres-Pastrana MA. 2004. Pleurotus pulmonarius cultivation on different agricultural by-products from Guerrero, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Micología 18, 77-80. https://www.scientiafungorum.org.mx/index.php/micologia/article/view/917/1097Links ]

Camacho M, Guzmán G, Guzman-Davalos L. 2012. Pleurotus opuntiae (Durieu et Lev.) Sacc. (Higher Basidiomycetes) and other species related to Agave and Opuntia plants in Mexico- taxonomy, distribution, and applications. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms 14(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMedMushr.v14.i1.70 [ Links ]

de Siqueira FG, Maciel WP, Martos ET, Duarte GC, Miller RN, da Silva R, Dias ES. 2012. Cultivation of Pleurotus mushrooms in substrates obtained by short composting and steam pasteurization. African Journal of Biotechnology 11(53), 11630-11635. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB12.451 [ Links ]

Dundar A, Acay H, Yildiz A. 2009. Effect of using different lignocellulosic wastes for cultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq.) P. Kumm. on mushroom yield, chemical composition and nutritional value. African Journal of Biotechnology 8, 662-666. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/view/59909Links ]

España Rodríguez M, Hernández Domínguez EM, Velázquez de Lucio BS, Villa García M, Álvarez Cervantes J. 2021. Productividad y análisis químico proximal de Pleurotus spp. crecidos sobre bagazo de Agave salmiana como sustrato alternativo. Agrociencia 55(7), 569-581. https://doi.org/10.47163/agrociencia.v55i7.2604 [ Links ]

Gaitán-Hernández R, Salmones D, Pérez-Merlo R, Mata G. 2009. Biological efficiency evaluation of Pleurotus pulmonarius strains on fermented barley straw. Revista Mexicana Micología 30, 63-71. https://www.scientiafungorum.org.mx/index.php/micologia/article/view/1054/1234Links ]

González de la Tijera M. 2014. Metabolitos secundarios de Pleurotus dryinus cultivado sobre bagazo de maguey. Tesis doctoral, Universidad Veracruzana. [ Links ]

Guzmán G. 2000. Genus Pleurotus (Jacq.: Fr.) P. Kumm. (Agaricomycetideae): diversity, taxonomic problems, and cultural and traditional medicinal uses. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms 2(2), 95-123. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMedMushr.v2.i2.10 [ Links ]

Guzmán G, Mata G, Salmones D, Soto-Velazco C, Guzmán-Dávalos L. 2013. El cultivo de los hongos comestibles, con especial atención a especies tropicales y subtropicales en esquilmos y residuos agroindustriales. 3rd ed. México D.F., Instituto Politécnico Nacional. [ Links ]

Guzmán-Dávalos L, Martínez-Carrera D, Morales P, Soto C. 1987. Edible mushroom cultivation (Pleurotus) on maguey bagasse of tequila industry. Revista Mexicana de Micología 3, 47-49. https://www.scientiafungorum.org.mx/index.php/micologia/article/view/685/869Links ]

Heredia Solís A, Esparza Ibarra EL, Romero Bautista L, Cabral Arellano FJ, Bañuelos Valenzuela R. 2014. Bagazos de Agave salmiana y Agave weberi utilizados como sustrato para producir Pleurotus ostreatus. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencias 1(5), 103-110. [ Links ]

Hinke N. 2007. Brief lexicón of maguey. Ciencias 85, 24-26. https://www.revistacienciasunam.com/es/busqueda/titulo/195-revistas/revista-ciencias-46.htmlLinks ]

Huerta G, Martínez-Carrera D, Sánchez JE, Leal-Lara H, Vilgalys R. 2010. Genetic relationships between Mexican species of Pleurotus analyzing the ITS-region from rDNA. Micología Aplicada International 22(1), 15-25. [ Links ]

Lechner BE, Albertó E. 2011. Search for new naturally occurring strains of Pleurotus to improve yields: Pleurotus albidus as a novel proposed species for mushroom production. Revista Iberoamericana de Micología 28, 148-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riam.2010.12.001 [ Links ]

Mata G, Gaitán Hernández R, Salmones D. 2012. El cultivo de hongos en México: una industria con posibilidades de diversificación. In: Sánchez Vázquez, J.E., G. Mata (eds.), Hongos comestibles y medicinales en Iberoamérica: investigación y desarrollo en un entorno multicultural. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur - Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Tapachula. [ Links ]

Mata G, Salmones D (eds.). 2021. Técnicas de aislamiento, cultivo y conservación de cepas de hongos en el laboratorio. Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa. [ Links ]

Mata G, Torres-Hernández F. 2008. Effect of aerobic fermentation substrate in Pleurotus ostreatus production and resistance to Trichoderma viride. In: Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products (ICMBMP), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products, Bonn. Pp.74-82. [ Links ]

Mata G, Salmones D, Savoie JM. 2017. Las enzimas ligninocelulolíticas de Pleurotus spp. In: Sánchez JE, Royse D (eds.), La biología, el cultivo, las propiedades nutricionales y medicinales de las setas Pleurotus spp. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristóbal de las Casas. Pp. 63-82. [ Links ]

Molina-Castillo S, Espinoza-Ortega A, Thomé-Ortiz H, Moctezuma-Pérez S. 2023. Gastronomic diversity of wild edible mushrooms in the Mexican cuisine. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science 31, 100652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2022.100652 [ Links ]

Pandey VK, Singh MP. 2014. Biodegradation of wheat straw by Pleurotus ostreatus. Cellular and Molecular Biology 60 (5), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2014.60.5.6 [ Links ]

Picornell MR, Pardo-Giménez A, Navarro MJ, Gea FJ. 2017. Actualizaciones sobre la preparación del sustrato para cultivar setas Pleurotus spp. In: Sánchez JE, Royse DJ (eds.), La biología, el cultivo y las propiedades nutricionales y medicinales de las setas Pleurotus spp. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristobal de las Casas. Pp. 83-104. [ Links ]

Portilla-Segura A, Romero-Arenas O, Valencia de Ita MA, Hernández Espinosa MA, Lanteta Cortés G, Rivera-Tapia JA. 2019. Determinación de los parámetros de productividad de cepas de Pleurotus ostreatus y P. opuntiae cultivadas en paja de trigo y pencas de maguey combinadas con sustratos agrícolas. Scientia Fungorum 49, e1216. https://doi.org/10.33885/sf.2019.49.1216 [ Links ]

Pérez-Moreno J, Guerin-Laguette A, Rinaldi AC, Yu F, Verbeken A, Hernández-Santiago F, Martínez-Reyes M. 2021. Edible mycorrhizal fungi of the world: What is their role in forest sustainability, food security, biocultural conservation and climate change? Plants, People, Planet 3(5), 471-490. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10199 [ Links ]

Philippoussis A. 2009. Production of mushrooms using agro-industrial residues as substrates. In: Nigam, P.S., A. Pandey (eds.), Biotechnology for agro-industrial residues utilization. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., Dordrecht. Pp.163-196. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-9942-7_9Links ]

Rodríguez-Estrada AE, Jimenez-Gasco MM, Royse DJ. 2009. Improvement of yield of Pleurotus eryngii var. eryngii by substrate supplementation and use of a casing overlay. Bioresource Technology 100, 5270-5276. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S096085240900649XLinks ]

Royse DJ, Rhodes TW, Ohga S, Sánchez JE. 2004. Yield, mushroom size and time to production of Pleurotus cornucopiae (oyster mushroom) grown on switch grass substrate spawned and supplemented at various rates. Bioresource Technology 91(1), 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00151-2 [ Links ]

Royse DJ, Sánchez JE. 2017. Producción mundial de setas Pleurotus spp. con énfasis en países iberoamericanos. In: Sánchez JE, Royse DJ (eds.), La biología, el cultivo y las propiedades nutricionales y medicinales de las setas Pleurotus spp. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristobal de las Casas. Pp. 17-25. [ Links ]

Salmones D, Cheng J, Llarena-Hernández RC, Mata G, Gaitán-Hernández R, Cruz Villegas I. 2022. Actualidades sobre la sistemática, genética y genómica de los géneros Agaricus y Pleurotus, con énfasis en especies que crecen en México: estrategias para identificar nuevas especies o variedades de interés comercial. In: Martínez-Carrera D, Mayett Moreno Y, Maimone Celorio R (eds.), Los hongos comestibles, funcionales y medicinales: Aportación a la dieta, la salud, la cultura, al ambiente, y al sistema agroalimentario de México. Colegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco. Pp. 337-358. [ Links ]

Salmones D, Mata G. 2017. Recursos genéticos del género Pleurotus. In: Sánchez JE, Royse DJ (eds.), La biología, el cultivo y las propiedades nutricionales y medicinales de las setas Pleurotus spp. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristobal de las Casas. Pp. 29-51. [ Links ]

Salmones D, Mata G, Gaitán-Hernández R, Ortega C. 2020. Cepas de Pleurotus pulmonarius con alta capacidad productiva seleccionadas de micelios dicarióticos. Scientia Fungorum 50:e1270. https://doi.org/10.33885/sf.2020.50.1270 [ Links ]

Salmones, Mata G, Waliszewski KN. 2005. Comparative culturing of Pleurotus spp. on coffee pulp and wheat straw: biomass production and substrate biodegradation. Bioresource Technology 96(5), 537-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.019 [ Links ]

Sánchez A, Ysunza F, Beltrán-García MJ, Esqueda M. 2002. Biodegradation of viticulture wastes by Pleurotus: A source of microbial and human food and its potential use in animal feeding. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 50, 2537-2542. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011308s [ Links ]

Sherief AA, El-Tanash AB, Temraz A. 2010. Lignocellulolytic enzymes and substrate utilization during growth and fruiting of Pleurotus ostreatus on some solid wastes. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 3, 18-34. [ Links ]

Soto-Velazco C, Guzmán-Dávalos L, Rodríguez O. 1989. Cultivation of the edible mushroom Pleurotus ostreatus on fermented maguey tequilero bagasse and mixed with wheat straw. Revista Mexicana de Micología 5, 97-101. https://www.scientiafungorum.org.mx/index.php/micologia/article/view/743/926Links ]

Vega A, Franco H. 2013. Productividad y calidad de los cuerpos fructíferos de los hongos comestibles Pleurotus pulmonarius RN2 y P. djamor RN81 y RN82 cultivados sobre sustratos lignocelulósicos. Información Tecnológica 24(1), 69-78. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642013000100009 [ Links ]

Van Soest PV, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74(10), 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 [ Links ]

Velázquez-Cedeño M, Mata G, Farnet AM, Savoie JM. 2006. Preliminary study of the termotolerant bacterial microflore of the coffee pulp and wheat straw with potential of inhibition against Trichoderma viride in the culture of Pleurotus spp. Revista Mexicana de Micología 22, 33-39. https://www.scientiafungorum.org.mx/index.php/micologia/article/view/968/1148Links ]

Velázquez de Lucio BS, Téllez-Jurado A, Hernández-Domínguez EM, Tovar-Jiménez X, Castillo-Ortega LS, Mercado-Flores Y, Álvarez-Cervantes J. 2022. Evaluation of bagasse Agave salmiana as a substrate for the cultivation of Pleurotus djamor. Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Química 21(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.24275/rmiq/Bio2735 [ Links ]

Vlasenko E, Kuznetsova O. 2020. The influence of complex additives on the synthesis of aroma substances by gray oyster culinary-medicinal mushroom, Pleurotus ostreatus (Agaricomycetes) during the substrate cultivation. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms 22(3), 305-311. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMedMushrooms.2020033977 [ Links ]

Vogel F, Salmones D. 2000. Comparative study of the productivity of strains of Pleurotus spp. in comercial cultivation. Revista Iberoamericana de Micología 17, 138-141. https://reviberoammicol.com/2000-17/138141.pdfLinks ]

Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. [ Links ]

Zervakis GI, Venturella G, Fryssouli V, Inglese P, Polemis E, Gargano ML. 2019. Pleurotus opuntiae revisited-An insight to the phylogeny of dimitic Pleurotus species with emphasis on the P. djamor complex. Fungal Biology 123(3), 188-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2018.12.005 [ Links ]

Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Vargas-Ponce O, Rosales-Adame JJ, Colunga-García Marín P. 2013. Sustainability of the traditional management of Agave genetic resources in the elaboration of mezcal and tequila spirits in western Mexico. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 60, 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722012-9812-z [ Links ]

Received: May 03, 2024; Accepted: September 28, 2024; Published: October 02, 2024

*Gerardo Mata, e-mail: gerardo.mata@inecol.mx

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License