SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.51Biología reproductiva de la corvina Umbrina xanti (Perciformes: Sciaenidae) en el Pacífico central mexicano índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Ciencias marinas

versión impresa ISSN 0185-3880

Cienc. mar vol.51  Ensenada ene./dic. 2025  Epub 04-Abr-2025

https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.y2025.3498 

Research articles

Morphological and molecular characterization of the free-living Symbiodinium natans-clade A (Dinophyceae) from Bahía de La Paz, Gulf of California

Ana E. Ramos-Santiago1 
http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3652-3565

Ignacio Leyva-Valencia1  2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9904-1512

Yuri B. Okolodkov3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3421-3429

Christine J. Band-Schmidt1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8251-9820

1Departamento de Plancton y Ecología Marina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, 23079 La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico.

2Programa de Investigadoras e Investigadores por México, Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación, Mexico City, Mexico.

3Laboratorio de Botánica Marina y Planctología, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Pesquerías, Universidad Veracruzana, 94294 Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico.


Abstract.

The genus Symbiodinium is a group of mostly endosymbiotic dinoflagellates, commonly known as zooxanthellae, which live in association with marine invertebrates and protists. The objective of the present study was the morphological and molecular identification of 2 strains of Symbiodiniales (SNCETMAR-1 and SNCETMAR-2) isolated from the anemone Actinostella sp. from Bahía de La Paz, Gulf of California. Culture identification was conducted via photomicroscopy, including epifluorescence and scanning electron microscopy. A sequence of the SNCETMAR-2 strain was obtained from the 28S rDNA region. The combination of methods allowed the strains to be identified as Symbiodinium natans-clade A. This taxon is a group of endosymbiotic and free-living organisms, which facilitated the cultivation of the strains in the laboratory. The life cycle of this group presented 2 phases, a motile and a non-motile phase in the coccoid state, the last stage where both sexual and asexual division occur. This study extends the reports of clade A of the family Symbiodiniaceae in the Gulf of California and provides valuable information for its culture, identification, and phylogenetic analysis.

Key words: Actinostella; endosymbiont; Gulf of California; life stages; Symbiodinium; zooxanthellae

Resumen.

El género Symbiodinium es un grupo de dinoflagelados mayoritariamente endosimbiontes, comúnmente conocidos como zooxantelas, que viven asociados a invertebrados y protistas marinos. El objetivo del presente estudio fue la identificación morfológica y molecular de 2 cepas de Symbiodiniales (SNCETMAR-1 y SNCETMAR-2) aisladas de la anémona Actinostella sp. de la Bahía de La Paz, Golfo de California. La identificación se realizó a partir de cultivos empleando microscopía fotónica, incluyendo de epifluorescencia y electrónica de barrido. Se obtuvo una secuencia de la cepa SNCETMAR-2 de la región 28S del ADNr. La combinación de métodos permitió la identificación de las cepas como Symbiodinium natans-clado A. Este taxón es un grupo de organismos de vida libre, lo que facilitó el cultivo de las cepas en el laboratorio. El ciclo de vida de este grupo presentó 2 fases, una fase móvil y otra inmóvil en estado cocoide, siendo este el último estadio donde se presentó la división sexual y asexual. Este estudio amplía los reportes del clado A de la familia Symbiodiniaceae en el Golfo de California, proporcionando información valiosa para su cultivo, identificación y análisis filogenético.

Palabras clave: Actinostella; endosimbionte; Golfo de California; estados reproductivos; Symbiodinium; zooxantelas

INTRODUCTION

Symbiodinium Gert Hansen & Daugbjerg is a photosynthetic genus with opportunistic and free-living clades and subclades, which is distributed in tropical and subtropical areas (Takabayashi et al. 2012, Granados-Cifuentes et al. 2015, Hoppenrath et al. 2023). The genus name is considered neutral and means “living together” and “whirling” (LaJeunesse et al. 2018). These organisms have also been called Zooxanthella K. Brandt (Guiry and Andersen 2018). This refers to the mutualistic symbiosis shown by the alga, which in this case is the symbiosis of the dinoflagellate with invertebrates such as cnidarians, clams, copepods, flatworms, sponges, and some protozoans, such as foraminiferans, radiolarians, and ciliates (Baker 2003, Hirose et al. 2008, LaJeunesse et al. 2018). In addition, they are classified as cytobionts or intracellular symbionts (Taylor and Harrison 1983).

Species of the Symbiodiniaceae family (e.g., Symbiodinium microadriaticum LaJeunesse and Symbiodinium pilosum Trench & R.J. Blank ex La Jeunesse) show different photosynthetic responses under identical laboratory conditions. These photosynthetic differences explain the presence of this family in the diverse niches they can occupy (Iglesias-Prieto and Trench 1994). Host-symbiont specificity demonstrates the ability of a symbiont to be specialized for a certain host that inhabits a specific region; in addition, variations in said specificity are shown over wide geographic ranges. Physical (temperature and irradiance) and biological (host diversity and abundance and symbiont diversity and abundance) variables modulate symbiont-host specificity (Iglesias-Prieto et al. 1992, 2004; Iglesias-Prieto and Trench 1994, 1997). In addition to their role as symbionts, extracts of strains of the Symbiodiniaceae family isolated from the anemone Stichodactyla haddoni (Saville-Kent) have been reported to be cytotoxic to the crustacean Artemia salina (Linnaeus) (Bigham-Soostani et al. 2021).

The Symbiodiniaceae family is a diverse group comprising several generic and subgeneric clades, each consisting of an unknown number of subspecies or subclades (Iglesias-Prieto et al. 2004, LaJeunesse et al. 2018). Phylogenetic reconstructions with ribosomal (28S and 23S) and chloroplast (psbA) genes have revealed 9 clades (A to I) (Hirose et al. 2008, Hansen and Daugbjerg 2009, Pochon and Gates 2010, Yamashita and Koike 2013, LaJeunesse et al. 2018). New genera have been proposed with respect to phylogenetic groupings: Symbiodinium Gert Hansen & Daugbjerg (clade A), Breviolum J.E. Parkinson & LaJeunesse (clade B), Cladocopium (clade C), Durusdinium LaJeunesse (clade D), Effrenium LaJeunesse & H.J. Jeong (clade E), Fugacium LaJeunesse (clade F), and Gerakladium LaJeunesse (clade G) (LaJeunesse et al. 2018). Few clades show apparent morphological differences: clade B has cell sizes of 6 to 12 µm, and clade C has an apical groove called acrobase (LaJeunesse et al. 2018).

The strains analyzed in this study belong to clade A, corresponding to the oldest lineage of the Symbiodiniaceae family, which is made up of S. microadriaticum, Symbiodinium necroappetens LaJeunesse, S. Y. Lee, Knowlton & H. J. Jeong, Symbiodinium tridacnidarum S. Y. Lee, H. J. Jeong, N. S. Kang & LaJeunesse, Symbiodinium natans Gert Hansen & Daugbjerg, and Symbiodinium linucheae (Hansen and Daugbjerg 2009, LaJeunesse et al. 2018). Clade A includes free-living species, such as S. pilosum and S. natans (Yamashita and Koike 2013, LaJeunesse et al. 2015), in addition to groups with transient, opportunistic, free-living, and symbiotic forms that can be found associated with invertebrate hosts or protists (LaJeunesse et al. 2018). It can also inhabit different substrates, such as sand (Carlos et al. 1999, Hoppenrath et al. 2023), and form symbioses with soft corals (e.g., Stereonephthya cundabiluensis Verseveldt), stony corals, or hard corals, such as Orbicella faveolata (Ellis & Solander) (Hirose et al. 2008, Kemp et al. 2014).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation and growing conditions

Cells were isolated from the column of the solitary anemone Actinostella sp. (Hexacorallia: Actinaria: Actiniidae; Fig. 1) that was collected by Ana E Ramos-Santiago on August 9, 2018, at the CETMAR beach (4°08′39.2″ N, 110°20′41.0″ W; Fig. 2), Bahía de La Paz, in the southwestern Gulf of California, Mexico. Non-motile cells were isolated on an AXIO Vert.A1 inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), using capillaries with reduced tips. A progressive escalation was carried out until we obtained 25-mL cultures in flat 50-mL tubes. The SNCETMAR-1 and SNCETMAR-2 strains were kept in GSe medium with vermicompost extract (Bustillos-Guzmán et al. 2015) and K medium (Keller et al. 1987) modified with vermicompost extract at 34 salinity, 24 °C ± 1 °C temperature, continuous 150-μmol E·m-2·s-1 illumination, and a 12 h light:12 h dark cycle.

Figure 1 Symbiodinium-clade A and the host anemone Actinostella sp. Specimen of the anemone Actinostella sp. preserved in 4% formalin, the top view of the collar and oral disc with retracted tentacles is observed (red arrow); lateral view of the spine (blue arrow) (a). Details of live Actinostella sp., coloration is observed, lower detail of the collar with small aligned warts (gray arrow) (b). Lateral view of the spine with large and numerous warts (white arrows) (c). Freshly isolated cells of Symbiodinium sp. (SNCETMAR-2 strain), with green-yellow chloroplasts (ch) and pyrenoid (py) (black arrows) (d). 

Figure 2 Location of Bahía de La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico. The red marker indicates the location of the CETMAR beach sampling site (24°08′39.2″ N, 110°20′41.0″ W). 

Morphological identification

Strain identification was done with the help of specialized literature (LaJeunesse et al. 2015, 2018; Hoppenrath et al. 2023). We evaluated morphometry and obtained micrographs of live cells on the Axio Vert.A1 inverted photonic microscope (Carl Zeiss) in bright field. In addition, we used the Axio Scope.A1 epifluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss) with a 6-megapixel Axiocam 506 color digital camera to observe cells stained with the fluorescent marker DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Sigma) and visualize the position and size of the nucleus. To process samples for scanning electron microscopy (SEM), we followed the protocol used by Ramos-Santiago (2023) for naked dinoflagellates. Broadly, the methodology consisted of a prefixation process with 4% glutaraldehyde, postfixation with 2% osmium tetroxide (OsO4), in-between washes to eliminate fixative residues, dehydration with an ethanol gradient (EtOH) at 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and twice at 99%, and a drying process of the samples with hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS). The samples were sent to the Academic Service of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SAMEB) of the Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (ICMyL), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico.

Molecular identification

DNA extraction and amplification

DNA extraction from the SNCETMAR-1 and SNCETMAR-2 strains was performed using the Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus Universal kit (Zymo Research, USA). For amplification, a mixture of 6.25 µL of DreamTaq Green PCR 2X (Thermo Scientific, USA), 2 µL of milli-Q H2O, 1 µL of each primer (F and R), and 1 µL of DNA was used. Primers for 28S rDNA were used (Hosoi-Tanabe et al. 2006). Amplification conditions consisted of a denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 1 min, at an annealing temperature of 52 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 2 min, and, finally, an extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR samples were verified by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis with 1X TBE Buffer. The image was digitized under the Bio-Rad ChemiDoc XRS+ system. The PCR products were sent for purification and sequencing to the company Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea). It is important to note that DNA extraction was successful in both strains; however, amplification was only achieved with the SNCETMAR-2 strain.

Phylogenetic analysis

The sequence was edited with the Sequencher program v. 4.1.4. Sequences from the GenBank database were used to perform a BLAST analysis of the consensus sequence (Forward + Reverse). Sequences from the different clades of the Symbiodiniaceae family from the 28S rDNA region were selected for the reconstruction of the phylogenetic trees. Sequence alignment was performed with the MEGA v. 10.0.5 program, with the MUSCLE alignment algorithm. The model that best described the nucleotide substitution rates of the sequences was selected with the JModel test v. 2.1.10, using the general time reversible (GTR) model for the phylogenetic analysis, which was done with the maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) algorithms in the MEGA v. 10.0.5 program and Bayesian inference (BI) with the MrBayes program v. 3.2.7a. Trees were constructed with a bootstrap of 1,000 replicates for ML and 3 × 106 generations for BI. The trees were edited with Photoshop CS6 v. 13.1.2.

RESULTS

Symbiodinium-clade A morphology

Solitary cells, reddish in color, with rotating movement, which are distributed at the bottom and on the walls of the culture tube (Fig. 3a, b). Reticulated, brownish, and peripheral chloroplasts (Fig. 3c). The pyrenoid is located in the central area of the cell and has a diameter of 2.65 ± 0.52 µm (Fig. 3c-e). The mastigote (motile) cells are mushroom-shaped, laterally compressed, with the epicone slightly larger than the hypocone (Fig. 3c-i). Motile cells measure 10.93 ± 0.98 µm long and 7.79 ± 1.06 µm wide (mean ± SD; n = 30) in strain SNCETMAR-1 (Table S1), and 11.78 ± 1.05 µm long and 8.02 ± 1.38 µm wide (mean ± SD; n = 30) in the SNCETMAR-2 strain (Table S1). The nucleus is located in the anterior part of the cell (Fig. 3h, l). Another morphotype observed were coccoid non-motile cells, with a diameter of 12.01 ± 0.83 µm (mean ± SD; n = 30; Fig. 3j-l). The non-motile morphotype lacks morphological characteristics typical of motile cells.

Figure 3 Subclade Symbiodinium natans-clade A from Bahía de La Paz. SNCETMAR-2 strain in GSe medium (a). SNCETMAR-1 strain (c-f). SNCETMAR-2 strain (b, g-l). Coccoid cells, non-motile, grouped together by mucilage (b). Ventral view of motile cells with the typical mushroom shape (c-e). Rounded and elongated reproductive cysts, they show reserve substances or an eye spot (white arrows) (f). Non-motile mushroom-shaped cells and coccoid state (g, j). DAPI staining shows the position and shape of the nucleus (n) in the 2 phases of the life cycle of Symbiodinium sp. (h, l). Epifluorescence images of chloroplasts (i, k). ch = chloroplasts, py = pyrenoid, lf = longitudinal flagellum. 

We documented 2 life forms in both strains of Symbiodinium, motile cells and non-motile cells in the coccoid state, the latter being the dominant phase. Non-motile cells were observed in pre-division (Fig. 4a-c). Different phases of the division processes were documented: dyads with duplicated pyrenoids and the presence of one accumulation body and, on the other hand, cells with 2 accumulation bodies, which could indicate the fusion of 2 gametes (Fig. 4c-f). Cells forming clusters in triads and tetrads (Fig. 3g-j) and the presence of zygotes formed by fusion (syngamy) of gametes (Fig. 4k, l) were also observed. In coccoid cells in the process of reproduction, red-orange accumulation bodies were observed; these are probably lipids used as reserve substances or an eyespot (Fig. 5).

Figure 4 Symbiodinium natans-clade A cysts from Bahía de La Paz. SNCETMAR-1 strain (e, h, j-l). SNCETMAR-2 strain (a, b, c, d, f, g, i). Non-motile predivision cyst or coccoid stage (a-c). Bicellular division cyst (dyad phase) (d-f). Meiosis I, triad phase (g-i). Meiosis II, tetrad phase, where 4 haploid cells are formed (j). Zygote (diploid) (k, l). White arrow with margin = reserve substances (lipids) or an eyespot, asterisk (*) = binary fission process, py = pyrenoid. 

Figure 5 Symbiodinium-clade A cells (SNCETMAR-2 strain) in epifluorescence microscope. Optical micrographs of non-motile cysts (a, d, g, i, k). Chloroplast autofluorescence in ventral view (b, c, f, j). DAPI staining of the nucleus (n) (e, h, l). White arrow with margin = lipids as storage products or eyespot, red arrow = division plane. 

With SEM, the morphology of motile cells and the aforementioned reproductive stages were corroborated, as well as the cingulum, which is descending and displaced approximately one width of the cingulum (Fig. 6). We were unable to observe the arrangement of amphiesmal plates with this technique.

Figure 6 Vegetative cells of Symbiodinium natans-clade A observed under a scanning electron microscope. SNCETMAR-1 strain (b, c, g, h). SNCETMAR-2 strain (a, d, e, f, i, j). Vegetative cysts, the dominant phase of Symbiodinium sp. (a). Ventral view (b). Dorsal view (c, e). Zoosporangium with cingulum housing the transverse flagellum (d). Binary fission process (f, g). Meiosis I (h, i). Meiosis II (j). ci = cingulum, su = sulcus, ep = epicone, hy = hypocone. 

Molecular identification

We obtained a 514 bp sequence of the 28S rDNA region of strain SNCETMAR-2 (PP563703). In BLAST analyses performed in this study, the sequence showed 100% identity with the OQ449283 sequence, identified as S. natans. However, efforts were made to ensure that the selected sequences came from published studies or subsequent research in which their molecular identification has been corroborated. For the phylogenetic reconstruction of this taxonomic group, we included sequences from the 9 clades accepted for the Symbiodiniaceae family (Table 1). The sequence from this study clustered within clade A, with bootstrap support values of 91 and 97 for MP and ML, and posterior probability of 0.98 with BI (Fig. 7). The SNCETMAR-2 strain sequence formed a subclade with S. natans sequences with bootstrap support values between 70 and 89 (Fig. 7). We compared 2 S. natans sequences (AB704055 and AB704058) with the SNCETMAR-2 sequence; the AB704055 sequence showed a transition (C to T) at position 416, whereas in the AB704058 sequence there is a transition (A to G) at position 461. The analysis of the pairwise genetic divergences between the sequences identified as clade A revealed low values, ranging between 0.025 and 0.032. In contrast, divergences with sequences from other clades were greater than 0.141 (Table 2).

Table 1 Sequences of the Symbiodiniaceae family included in the phylogenetic analysis of the 28S rDNA region and Gymnodinium catenatum, which was used as an outgroup. 

GenBank ID Taxon Strain Isolation origin Site Reference
PP563703 Symbiodinium natans SNCETMAR-2 Actinostella sp. Bahía de La Paz, Mexico This study
AB704058 Symbiodinium natans FGS-D6-Sy Sand Gahi Island, Okinawa, Japan Yamashita and Koike (2013)
AB704055 Symbiodinium natans GTP-A6-Sy Tide pool Gahi Island, Okinawa, Japan Yamashita and Koike (2013)
EU315917 Symbiodinium natans CAT2393 ND Tenerife, Spain Hansen and Daugbjerg (2009)
KT634312 Symbiodinium sp. zs12xd Zoanthus sp. Tavernier, Florida Keys, USA Graham et al. (2015)
LK934674 Symbiodinium sp. CCMP2456 Alveopora japonica Eguchi, 1965 Jeju, South Korea Not published
AB778578 Symbiodinium sp. KMG004-a-02 Pteraeolidia ianthina (Angas, 1864) Chiba, Japan Yorifuji et al. (2015)
KF740671 Symbiodinium pilosum rt-185 Zoanthus sociatus (Ellis, 1768) Jamaica Jeong et al. (2014)
ON263282 Symbiodinium necroappetens A13 ND ND Not published
MK692538 Symbiodinium linucheae SSA01 ND ND Not published
KM972549 Symbiodinium microadriaticum rt-061 Cassiopea xamachana Bigelow, 1892 Florida, USA Lee et al. (2015)
LK934669 Symbiodinium microadriaticum CCMP2467 Alveopora japonica Jeju, South Korea Not published
KT149349 Symbiodinium minutum Mf1.05b ND Caribbean Parkinson et al. (2015)
LK934670 Symbiodinium minutum CCMP830 Alveopora japonica Jeju, South Korea Not published
KT149351 Symbiodinium psygmophilum PurPFlex ND Caribbean Parkinson et al. (2015)
KF364606 Symbiodinium sp. RCC 1521 Surface net trawl Blanes, Mediterranean Sea Jeong et al. (2014)
AF060899 Gymnodinium varians CCMP 421 ND ND Wilcox (1998)
AJ291539 Symbiodinium sp. 1584 Amphisorus sp. Guam Pawlowski et al. (2001)
AJ291536 Symbiodinium sp. 1643 Marginopora Luminao, Guam Pawlowski et al. (2001)
KF740689 Symbiodinium sp. MTB4 Orbicella faveolata (Ellis & Solander, 1786) USA Jeong et al. (2014)
KF740686 Symbiodinium sp. Tha09-57 Oulastrea crispata (Lamarck, 1816) Thailand Jeong et al. (2014)
FN561562 Symbiodinium sp. nr-i4 Foraminífera subfamily Soritinae Ehrenberg Oahu, Hawaii, USA Pochon and Gates (2010)
AJ291513 Symbiodinium sp. 751 Sorites sp. Florida, USA Pawlowski et al. (2001)
KF740682 Symbiodinium sp. Zam03-3m-83 Millepora Linnaeus, 1758 Japan Jeong et al. (2014)
FJ529530 Symbiodinium sp. C3nt Seriatopora hystrix Dana, 1846 Australia Sampayo et al. (2009)
AJ830916 Symbiodinium sp. MS26_5244x Amphisorus hemprichii Ehrenberg, 1965 Guam Island Not published
AJ291525 Symbiodinium sp. 1635 Marginopora sp. Piti, Guam Pawlowski et al. (2001)
KU359161 Symbiodinium kawagutii symka ND ND Not published
AF360577 Symbiodinium kawagutii Clade C Montipora verrucosa (Lamarck, 1816) Hawaii, USA Santos et al. (2001)
SD Gymnodinium catenatum BAPAZ 16 ND Bahía de La Paz, BCS, Mexico Not published
+ND: No data.

Table 2 Pairwise genetic distances based on 13 Symbiodiniaceae family sequences selected from the 28S rDNA region. The genetic divergences observed between the sequence of this study (*) belonging to clade A and the other clades are shown in bold. The letters A-I indicate the clades of the family Symbiodiniaceae. 

A B C D E F G H I Symbiodinium kawagutii
KF740671 PP563703* KT634312 AB778578 KT149349 FJ529530 KF740689 AF060899 AJ830916 AJ291539 AJ291513 FN561562 AF360577
A KF740671
PP563703* 0.025
KT634312 0.028 0.014
AB778578 0.032 0.018 0.004
B KT149349 0.237 0.240 0.240 0.244
C FJ529530 0.208 0.208 0.212 0.216 0.134
D KF740689 0.198 0.219 0.219 0.216 0.208 0.170
E AF060899 0.155 0.141 0.155 0.159 0.216 0.187 0.194
F AJ830916 0.212 0.212 0.216 0.219 0.120 0.092 0.198 0.201
G AJ291539 0.265 0.265 0.265 0.261 0.226 0.184 0.177 0.233 0.216
H AJ291513 0.187 0.191 0.194 0.198 0.124 0.049 0.159 0.180 0.085 0.184
I FN561562 0.205 0.212 0.219 0.219 0.159 0.134 0.177 0.205 0.141 0.201 0.127
Symbiodinium kawagutii AF360577 0.449 0.452 0.449 0.452 0.484 0.470 0.473 0.466 0.491 0.516 0.459 0.456

Figure 7 Symbiodinium phylogenetic tree of the 28S rDNA region. The sequence of the SNCETMAR-2 strain (PP563703) from this study is shown in bold. The analysis was deduced using the method of maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML), and Bayesian inference (BI). The percentage of bootstrap support values and posterior probability of the clades and subclades are shown in the nodes. The analysis included 30 sequences and analyzed partial sequences of 558 bp. Sequences selected for genetic divergence analysis in Table 2 are indicated with asterisks. ND = no data. 

DISCUSSION

The size of motile S. natans-clade A cells can range from 9.5 to 11.5 µm in length and 7.4 to 9 µm in width (Hansen and Daugbjerg 2009, LaJeunesse et al. 2015, Lee et al. 2015, Guiry and Guiry 2024), which agrees with what was reported in this study. The subclades S. necroappetens and S. microadriaticum show similar morphologies; nonetheless, these have cell sizes ranging from 9 to 12 µm (larger than S. natans) and from 7 to 10 µm (smaller than S. natans), respectively (LaJeunesse et al. 2015).

Currently, morphological and molecular identification within the Symbiodiniaceae family is complex. The number, shape, and position of the amphiesmal plates are used as descriptive morphological characteristics for the group; however, these are not sufficient for specific identification, as they may be similar or different within and between the groups that make up the clades (Lee et al. 2015, LaJeunesse et al. 2018). On the other hand, the morphological information of the amphiesmal plates in the motile stage (mastigote) of distantly related clades can yield different morphological information, as in clades A and E (Lee et al. 2015). The shape and size of the pyrenoid, chloroplasts, and nucleus have been used as morphological characters; however, in the Symbiodiniaceae family these characters are shared and cannot be used to differentiate clades or subclades (Lee et al. 2015). There is only one autapomorphy character, which is the reduction of a pronounced elongated apical vesicle (acrobase or apical groove), a characteristic observed in clade C (LaJeunesse et al. 2018). Nevertheless, members belonging to clade A lack this character, so this structure is not relevant in the strains analyzed in this study.

The morphology of the group can vary depending on the phase, with an observable coccoid phase, typical of asexual reproduction, and ellipsoidal to mushroom shapes (motile phase). Coccoid cells can measure 8-10 µm in diameter (LaJeunesse et al. 2018), whereas motile cells can average 6-12 µm in length (Hansen and Daugbjerg 2009, LaJeunesse et al. 2018). In culture, cells were observed forming groups in triads and tetrads, corresponding to meiosis I and late meiosis II of sexual reproduction, respectively. Figueroa et al. (2021) reported these reproductive phases in a Symbiodinium strain of clade C (Cladocopium latusorum Turnham, Sampayo & LaJeunesse) from Moorea in French Polynesia, South Pacific Ocean.

Phylogenetic reconstructions with ribosomal (28S and 23S) and chloroplast (psbA) genes reveal 9 evolutionarily divergent clades (A to I) (seeTable 2, Pochon and Gates 2010, LaJeunesse et al. 2018). The high and low pairwise genetic divergence values in this study were very similar to those of Pochon and Gates (2010) because we included some long subunit sequences identified by these authors as clade E (AF060899), clade F3 (AJ830916, AJ291525), clade G (AJ291539), clade H (AJ291513), and clade I (FN561562). The different clades of the Symbiodiniaceae family have different genetic, physiological, and ecological attributes; therefore, these clades can be subdivided into an unknown number of phylospecies (Hirose et al. 2008, De Palmas et al. 2015, LaJeunesse et al. 2018). The 9 clades accepted for the group were obtained with the analysis of the 28S region. The sequence from this study had greater genetic affinity with sequences from clade A; specifically, with sequences from the free-living species S. natans from Japan and Spain (Yamashita and Koike 2013, LaJeunesse et al. 2015). Although this clade shows high genetic diversity (around 15 subclades), the 28S marker helped us identify clade A and the presence of 4 subclades within it; however, a highly variable marker such as the ITS set has been observed to help identify specificities with respect to the environments where these microorganisms develop (pelagic and benthic) and their symbiotic associations to understand the divergence within the same clade or group (Mordret et al. 2016).

Clade A is widely distributed in the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian oceans and in the Red Sea. Nevertheless, some subclades may be limited to certain ocean basins, for example, the Caribbean Sea, which has the highest number of reports (LaJeunesse et al. 2015). The clade has been reported in Callao Salvaje, Tenerife, in the Canary Islands (Hansen and Daugbjerg 2009, Guiry and Guiry 2024); Japan and Hawaii (Carlos et al. 1999, Hirose et al. 2008, Yamashita and Koike 2013); Florida Keys in the USA (Lee et al. 2015); and Puerto Morelos in the Mexican Caribbean (Kemp et al. 2014).

In the southern Gulf of California, studies report clade C (abundant and widely distributed) associated with Pavona gigantea (Verrill) and clade D (extremophiles, its distribution centered in the Indo-West Pacific) with Pocillopora verrucosa (Ellis & Solander) (Iglesias-Prieto et al. 2004, LaJeunesse et al. 2018, Méndez-Méndez 2020). This study expands the list of Symbiodinium clades in the Gulf of California and describes the presence of clade A associated with the anemone Actinostella sp.

Usually, Symbiodinium clade A is associated with shallow water corals in the Caribbean and tidal pools, which generated the hypothesis that this clade is adapted to shallow areas (less than 1 m) due to the presence of photoacclimation and photoprotection pathways that counteract the high irradiance and high temperatures that can occur in these environments (Iglesias-Prieto and Trench 1997, Hirose et al. 2008, Takahashi et al. 2009, Yamashita and Koike 2013, Kemp et al. 2014). The results of the present study agree with this hypothesis, since the dinoflagellate was isolated in Bahía de La Paz, at a depth of less than 1 m (benthic habitat), in an area with high irradiance and high temperatures, which can reach 27 to 32 °C in the summer (Sea temperature 2024).

Clade A has been shown to be one of the easiest to culture due to its physiological and ecological characteristics and can occur in non-symbiotic, free-living form. This study provides information on the laboratory culture of symbiotic dinoflagellates from clade A from Bahía de La Paz; these strains have been maintained since 2018 to the present and can be cultured in specialized media (e.g., ASP-8A) and conventional media used for planktonic and benthic dinoflagellates, such as IMK, L1, modified GSe, and modified K media (this study, Hirose et al. 2008, LaJeunesse et al. 2015, Lee et al. 2015).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the morphometric analyses combined with the phylogenetic analysis are conclusive for the Symbiodinium-clade A taxon. The phylogenetic analysis of the 28S region showed 9 clades currently accepted for the Symbiodiniaceae family. Clade A was divided into different subclades of phylospecies, showing that the PP563703 sequence of strain SNCETMAR-2 has phylogenetic affinity with sequences from S. natans (currently accepted taxon). This study reported the first detailed description of S. natans-clade A for Bahía de La Paz, Gulf of California; this dinoflagellate alternates between 2 life phases, a free-living (planktonic) phase and a non-obligate symbiotic phase (benthic) that showed an association with the sea anemone Actinostella sp.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank LE Gómez-Lizárraga for providing the Scanning Electron Microscopy service of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and SU Cortés-Jiménez for helping to identify the anemone Actinostella sp. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable contributions that were fundamental to improve this manuscript.

REFERENCES

ABaker AC. 2003. Flexibility and specificity in coral-algal symbiosis: diversity, ecology, and biogeography of Symbiodinium. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 34(1):661-689. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.ECOLSYS.34.011802.132417 [ Links ]

Bigham-Soostani S, Yousefzadi M, Zarei-Darki B, Ranjbar MS. 2021. Evaluation of cytotoxic and antibacterial properties of Symbiodinium sp. isolated and purified from Stichodactyla haddoni in the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman. Aquat Physiol Biotechnol. 9(2):125-144. https://doi.org/10.22124/JAPB.2021.18141.1401 [ Links ]

Bustillos-Guzmán J, Band-Schmidt CJ, Durán-Riveroll LM, Hernández-Sandoval FE, López-Cortés DJ, Núñez-Vázquez EJ, Cembella A, Krock B. 2015. Paralytic toxin profile of the marine dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum Graham from the Mexican Pacific as revealed by LC-MS/MS. Food Addit Contam. 32A(3):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2014.1000978 [ Links ]

Carlos AA, Baillie BK, Kawachi M, Maruyama T. 1999. Phylogenetic position of Symbiodinium (Dinophyceae) isolates from tridacnids (Bivalvia), cardiids (Bivalvia), a sponge (Porifera), a soft coral (Anthozoa), and a free‐living strain. J Phycol. 35(5):1054-1062. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3551054.x [ Links ]

De Palmas S, Denis V, Ribas-Deulofeu L, Loubeyres M, Woo S, Hwang SJ, Song JI, Chen CA. 2015. Symbiodinium spp. associated with high-latitude scleractinian corals from Jeju Island, South Korea. Coral Reefs. 34:919-925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-015-1286-y [ Links ]

Figueroa RI, Howe-Kerr LI, Correa AMS. 2021. Direct evidence of sex and a hypothesis about meiosis in Symbiodiniaceae. Sci Rep. 11:18838. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98148-9 [ Links ]

Graham ER, Parekh A, Devassy RK, Sanders RW. 2015. Carbonic anhydrase activity changes in response to increased temperature and pCO2 in Symbiodinium-zoanthid associations. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 473:218-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2015.08.017 [ Links ]

Granados-Cifuentes C, Neigel J, Leberg P, Rodriguez-Lanetty M. 2015. Genetic diversity of free-living Symbiodinium in the Caribbean: the importance of habitats and seasons. Coral Reefs. 34(3):927-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-015-1291-1 [ Links ]

Guiry MD, Andersen RA. 2018. Validation of the generic name Symbiodinium (Dinophyceae, Suessiaceae) revisited and the reinstatement of Zooxanthella K. Brandt. Notulae Algarum. 58:1-5. [ Links ]

Guiry MD, Guiry GM. 2024. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication. Galway (Ireland): National University of Ireland; [accessed Feb 2024]. https://www.algaebase.org/search/genus/detail/?genus_id=44695Links ]

Hansen G, Daugbjerg N. 2009. Symbiodinium natans sp. nov.: a “free-living” dinoflagellate from Tenerife (Northeast-Atlantic Ocean). J Phycol. 45(1):251-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00621.x [ Links ]

Hirose M, Reimer JD, Hidaka M, Suda S. 2008. Phylogenetic analyses of potentially free-living Symbiodinium spp. isolated from coral reef sand in Okinawa, Japan. Mar Biol. 155:105-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-008-1011-2 [ Links ]

Hoppenrath M, Chomerat N, Horiguchi T, Murray SA, Rhodes L. 2023. Marine benthic dinoflagellates - their relevance for science and society. 2nd ed. Stuttgart (Germany): E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nägele u. Obermiller) and Senckenberg Geselschaft für Naturforschung. 376 p. [ Links ]

Hosoi-Tanabe S, Otake I, Sako Y. 2006. Phylogenetic analysis of noxious red tide flagellates Chattonella antiqua, C. marina, C. ovata, and C. verruculosa (Raphidophyceae) based on the rRNA gene family. Fish Sci. 72:1200-1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2006.01277.x [ Links ]

Iglesias-Prieto R, Beltrán VH, LaJeunesse TC, Reyes-Bonilla H, Thomé PE. 2004. Different algal symbionts explain the vertical distribution of dominant reef corals in the eastern Pacific. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 271:1757-1763. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2757 [ Links ]

Iglesias-Prieto R, Matta JL, Robins WA, Trench RK. 1992. Photosynthetic response to elevated temperature in the symbiotic dinoflagellate Symbiodinium microadriaticum in culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 89(21):10302-10305. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.21.10302 [ Links ]

Iglesias-Prieto R, Trench RK. 1994. Acclimation and adaptation to irradiance in symbiotic dinoflagellates. I. Responses of the photosynthetic unit to changes in photon flux density. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 113:163-175. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps113163 [ Links ]

Iglesias-Prieto R, Trench RK. 1997. Acclimation and adaptation to irradiance in symbiotic dinoflagellates. II. Response of chlorophyll-protein complexes to different photon-flux densities. Mar Biol. 130(1):23-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270050221 [ Links ]

Jeong HJ, Lee SY, Kang NS, Yoo YD, Lim AS, Lee MJ, Kim HS, Yih W, Yamashita H, LaJeunesse TC. 2014. Genetics and morphology characterize the dinoflagellate Symbiodinium voratum, n. sp., (Dinophyceae) as the sole representative of Symbiodinium Clade E. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 61(1):75-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12088 [ Links ]

Keller MD, Selvin RC, Claus W, Guillard RRL. 1987. Media for the culture of oceanic ultraplankton. J Phycol. 23(4):633-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1987.tb04217.x [ Links ]

Kemp DW, Hernandez-Pech X, Iglesias-Prieto R, Fitt WK, Schmidt GW. 2014. Community dynamics and physiology of Symbiodinium spp. before, during, and after a coral bleaching event. Limnol Oceanogr. 59(3):788-797. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2014.59.3.0788 [ Links ]

LaJeunesse TC, Lee SY, Gil-Agudelo DL, Knowlton N, Jeong HJ. 2015. Symbiodinium necroappetens sp. nov. (Dinophyceae): an opportunist ‘zooxanthella’ found in bleached and diseased tissues of Caribbean reef corals. Eur J Phycol. 50(2):223-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2015.1025857 [ Links ]

LaJeunesse TC, Parkinson JE, Gabrielson PW, Jeong HJ, Reimer JD, Voolstra CR, Santos SR. 2018. Systematic revision of Symbiodiniaceae highlights the antiquity and diversity of coral endosymbionts. Curr Biol. 28(16):2570-2580.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.008 [ Links ]

Lee SY, Jeong HJ, Kang NS, Jang TY, Jang SH, Lajeunesse TC. 2015. Symbiodinium tridacnidorum sp. nov., a dinoflagellate common to Indo-Pacific giant clams, and a revised morphological description of Symbiodinium microadriaticum Freudenthal, emended Trench & Blank. Eur J Phycol. 50(2):155-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2015.1018336 [ Links ]

Méndez-Méndez SM. 2020. Expresión diferencial de genes en Cladocopium sp. de dos especies de coral en el Golfo de California [dissertation]. [Mexico]: CIBNOR. 80 p. [ Links ]

Mordret S, Romac S, Henry N, Colin S, Carmichael M, Berney C, Audic S, Richter DJ, Pochon X, de Vargas C, et al. 2016. The symbiotic life of Symbiodinium in the open ocean within a new species of calcifying ciliate (Tiarina sp.) The ISME J. 10(6):1424-1436. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.211 [ Links ]

Parkinson JE, Coffroth MA, LaJeunesse TC. 2015. New species of Clade B Symbiodinium (Dinophyceae) from the greater Caribbean belong to different functional guilds: S. aenigmaticum sp. nov., S. antillogorgium sp. nov., S. endomadracis sp. nov., and S. pseudominutum sp. nov. J Phycol. 51(5):850-858. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12340 [ Links ]

Pawlowski J, Holzmann M, Fahrni JF, Pochon X, Lee JJ. 2001. Molecular identification of algal endosymbionts in large miliolid Foraminifera: 2. Dinoflagellates. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 48(3):368-373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2001.tb00326.x [ Links ]

Pochon X, Gates RD. 2010. A new Symbiodinium clade (Dinophyceae) from soritid foraminifera in Hawai’i. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 56(1):492-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.03.040 [ Links ]

Ramos-Santiago AE. 2023. Taxonomía morfológica y molecular de dinoflagelados epibentónicos del Golfo de California [dissertation]. [Mexico]: CICIMAR-IPN. 203 p. [ Links ]

Sampayo EM, Dove S, LaJeunesse TC. 2009. Cohesive molecular genetic data delineate species diversity in the dinoflagellate genus Symbiodinium. Mol Ecol. 18(3):500-519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04037.x [ Links ]

Santos SR, Taylor DJ, Coffroth MA. 2001. Genetic comparisons of freshly isolated versus cultured symbiotic dinoflagellates: Implications for extrapolating to the intact symbiosis. J Phycol. 37(5):900-912. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.00194.x [ Links ]

Sea temperature. 2024. Water temperature in La Paz (BCS); [accessed Feb 2024]. https://seatemperature.info/august/mexico/la-paz-water-temperature.htmlLinks ]

Takabayashi M, Adams LM, Pochon X, Gates RD. 2012. Genetic diversity of free-living Symbiodinium in surface water and sediment of Hawai̔i and Florida. Coral Reefs. 31(1):157-167. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-011-0832-5 [ Links ]

Takahashi S, Whitney SM, Badger MR. 2009. Different thermal sensitivity of the repair of photodamaged photosynthetic machinery in cultured Symbiodinium species. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 106:3237-3242. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808363106 [ Links ]

Taylor FJR, Harrison PJ. 1983. Ecological aspects of intracellular symbiosis. In: Schenk HEA, Schwemmler W, Intracellular Space as Oligogenetic Ecosystem. Berlin (Germany): De Gruyter. p. 828-842. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110841237-086 [ Links ]

Wilcox TP. 1998. Large-subunit ribosomal RNA systematics of symbiotic dinoflagellates: morphology does not recapitulate phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 10(3):436-448. [ Links ]

Yamashita H, Koike K. 2013. Genetic identity of free-living Symbiodinium obtained over a broad latitudinal range in the Japanese coast. Phycol Res. 61(1):68-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/pre.12004 [ Links ]

Yorifuji M, Takeshima H, Mabuchi K, Watanabe T, Nishida M. 2015. Comparison of Symbiodinium dinoflagellate flora in sea slug populations of the Pteraeolidia ianthina complex. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 521:91-104. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11155 [ Links ]

DECLARATIONS

1English translation by Claudia Michel-Villalobos.

Supplementary Material: The supplementary material for this work can be down-loaded from: https://cienciasmarinas.com.mx/index.php/cmarinas/article/view/3498/420421145

Funding

This study was funded by projects from Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (SECIHTI) A1-S-14968, SECIHTI Proyecto Nacional de Investigación e Incidencia, Programas Nacionales Estratégicos SSyS 319104 and the institutional projects SIP 2024-0544 and SIP 2024-0486. AER-S benefited from the scholarship 1151607 from SECIHTI and B210365 from the Beca de Estímulo Institucional de Formación de Investigadores. CJB-S receives a scholarship from Programa de Estímulos al Desempeño de los Investigadores y Comisión de Operación y Fomento de Actividades Académicas del Instituto Politécnico Nacional.

Data availability: The data for this study are available from the corresponding author by reasonable request.

Use of AI tools: The authors did not employ any AI tools in this work.

Received: June 10, 2024; Accepted: December 13, 2024

*Corresponding author: cbands@ipn.mx

Conceptualization: AER-S, IL-V, CJB-S; Data curation: AER-S; Formal analysis: AER-S, IL-V, YBO; Funding acquisition: CJB-S; Investigation: AER-S, IL-V, YBO, CJB-S; Methodology: AER-S, IL-V, YBO; Project administration: CJB-S; Resources: IIL-V, YBO, CJB-S; Software: IL-V, YBO; Supervision: IL-V, CJB-S, YBO; Validation: IL-V, CJB-S, YBO; Visualization: AER-S, IL-V, CJB-S, YBO; Writing-original draft: AER-S; Writing, review, and editing: AER-S, IL-V, YBO, CJB-S.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License