SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.69 número4First-principles investigation of the structural, electronic and optical properties of Zn2NbN3Revisión general de ADCs tipo noise shaping SAR: Fundamentos, retos y tendencias índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de física

versión impresa ISSN 0035-001X

Rev. mex. fis. vol.69 no.4 México jul./ago. 2023  Epub 19-Nov-2024

https://doi.org/10.31349/revmexfis.69.041301 

Optics

Spherical circles and constant angle surfaces

B. Yilmaza 

Y. Yaylib 

a Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam University, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.

b Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.


ABSTRACT

In this present paper, we obtain a general version of constant angle surfaces constructed concerning any direction in three dimensional Euclidean space. This constant angle surface is the special case of developable ruled surfaces whose direction is a spherical circle. Here, we obtain the constant angle surfaces by taking the circles (small circles) whose radius is less than the radius of the sphere, as the base curve. Also, the relationship between the isophote curve and this surface and its physical interpretation is mentioned. When we beam from a light source in a constant direction, the intensity of the light will be the same at every point on this constant angle surface. This study is very important in terms of associating optics, a branch of physics, with geometry, a branch of mathematics. Finally, we classify the singular points of these constant angle surfaces.

Keywords: Constant angle surface; spherical circle; isophote curve; optic; singularity

1 Introduction

A constant angle surface is a surface whose tangent planes make a constant angle with a fixed vector field of space. In another saying, constant angle surfaces whose unit normal form a constant angle with an assigned direction field in the Euclidean 3-space. This surface is the generalization of a helical curve. An interesting motivation to study helix surfaces or constant angle surfaces arises from physics. The most basic known application areas of constant angle surfaces are for light such as crystal, liquid, shape from shading problems. In recent years, many authors have studied these special surfaces to take advantage of their applications in mathematics and physics. Cermelli and Scala discuss some properties of constant angel surfaces in terms of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. They investigate the properties of a constant angle surface when the direction field is singular along a line or a point, [1]. Munteanu and Nistor obtain a classification for which the unit normal makes a constant angle with a fixed vector direction being the tangent direction to R in Euclidean 3-space, [2]. Many studies have been done on constant angle surfaces and developable surfaces [3, 4]. In [5], the author investigates the constant angle ruled surfaces generated by Frenet frame vectors. Recently the theory of constant angle surfaces are extended to other ambient spaces. For example; in [6, 7], they study these surfaces in Minkowski 3-space. In [8], the authors extend the concept of constant angle surfaces to a Lorentzian ambient space. Also, in product spaces S2×R [9, 10], in H2×R [11] and in Heisenberg group [12, 13].

On the other hand, an isophote curve is defined as the locus of surface points whose normal vectors make a constant angle with a given constant vector as seen in Fig. 1. So, we can say that the curves on the constant angle surface are isophote curves. The isophote curve is a nice corollary to Lambert’s law of cosines in the optics branch of physics. This law states that the illuminance intensity on a diffused surface is proportional to the cosine of the angle formed between the normal vector of the surface and the light vector. So, we can say the geometric description of isophote curves on surfaces which are the surface normal vectors in points of the curve make a constant angle with a fixed light direction, [14]. In recent years, there have been many applications of these curves in different branches. In [15], the authors are developed a novel technique to detect caries lesions using isophote concepts. Also, in [16], they present the implementation of a real-time eye detection method that uses the properties of isophotes, to achieve robustness against changes in illumination, eye rotation and pupil size.

Figure 1 An isophote on a surface.  

In this present paper, we investigate the spherical circles and constant angle surfaces in E3. This study has emerged by considering the study of Munteanu and Nistor in [2] from a different perspective. The difference of the present paper is that a constant angle surface is obtained with respect to any direction and some characterizations are given in three dimensional Euclidean space. This constant angle surface is the developable ruled surface whose direction is the spherical circle whose radius is less than the radius of the sphere. Also, by the definition of isophote curves, the curves on this surface are isophote curves. These curves have applications in many fields. At the beginning of these is optics, which is its application in physics. There are many studies that bring together the optics branch of physics and the geometry branch of mathematics [17, 18, 19, 20, 21]. This study is one of them. Based on that, we can say that when we beam from a light source in a constant direction, the intensity of the light will be the same at every point on this constant angle surface. On the other hand, the singularity of the ruled surfaces has been studied by many authors. We also investigate the singularity types of this special surface. Finally, as an application, we give some illustrated examples which support the theory of the paper.

2 Preliminaries

Let α=α(s):IE3 be an arbitrary curve in E3. The curve α is said to be a unit speed if α '(s),α '(s)=1 for any sI. Assume that t(s),n(s),b(s) be the moving frame of the curve α which satisfies the Frenet equations

dds    t(s)        n(s)        b(s)    =    0κ(s)0        -κ(s)0τ(s)        0-τ(s)0    t(s)n(s)b(s), (1)

where t(s),n(s),b(s),κ(s) and τ(s) are the tangent, the principal normal and the binormal vector fields, curvature and torsion of α(s), respectively, [22].

Let the position vector of the surface M in the standard form of Euclidean space E3 is

Φ(u,v)=(x1(u,v), x2(u,v),x3(u,v)).

Then the standard unit normal vector field N on the surface can be defined by

N=Φu×ΦvΦu×Φv, (2)

where Φu=(Φ(u,v)/u) and Φv=(Φ(u,v)/v). Also, the first and second fundamental forms of the surface are as follows

I=Edu2+2Fdudv+Gdv2,      II=edu2+2fdudv+gdv2 (3)

where the E, F and G components are called the coefficients of the first fundemental form of the surface, and the e, f and g components are called the coefficients of the second fundemental form, respectively. The following equations are given for the first and second fundamental form coefficients of the surface

E=Φu,Φu,    F=Φu,Φv,    G=Φv,Φv, (4)

and

e=Φuu,N,  f=Φuv,N,  g=Φvv,N. (5)

On the other hand, the Gaussian curvature K and the mean curvature H of the surface are as follows

K=eg-f2EG-F2, (6)

and

H=Eg+Ge-2Ff2(EG-F2) (7)

Definition 1. Letα,γbe curves and M be a surface in Euclidean 3-space. Surfaces formed by the movement of a line along a curve in space are called ruled surfaces. The parameterization of the ruled surface for any two differentiable curvesαandγis as follows

Φ(u,v)=α(v)+uγ(v),

whereα(v)is called base curve of the ruled surface andγ(v)is a unit direction vector of an oriented line inE3. In addition, if the direction curve is not constant, that is,γ'(v)0, the surface is called a non-cylindrical ruled surface, and the surfaces with a constant direction curve are called the generalized cylindrical surface,[23].

Theorem 1. Let M be a regular ruled surface with the parameterizationΦ(u,v)=α(v)+uγ(v). If the Gaussian curvature of the surface is zero, the surface M is called the developable surface. Also, another characterization for developable ruled surfaces is thatdet(α'(v),γ(v),γ'(v))=0, [24, 25].

Theorem 2. Let M be a surface in Euclidean 3-space. For the surfaceM=Φ(u,v)=α(v)+uγ(v), line of striction is calculated as,[26]

α-(v)=α(v)-γ(v)×γ'(v),γ(v)×α'(v)γ(v)×γ'(v)2γ(v)

Definition 2. Letα:IRE3be a unit speed curve in E 3 Points withα'(t)=0 on the curve α(t)are called singular points,[27].

The study of ruled surfaces is a main subject in differential geometry in Euclidean space. Generally, ruled surfaces have singularities. Briefly speaking, the cuspidal edge C×R, the cuspidal cross-cap CCR or the swallowtail appear SW as singularities of developable surfaces in general. The figures of these types of singularity are given below in Fig. 2, [28].

Figure 2. Types of singularity (C×R, CCR and SW, respectively). 

Theorem 3. LetΦ(α,γ):I×JR3be a noncylindrical developable surface andμ,λ:IRbe smooth functions withα '(t)=μ(t)γ(t)+λ(t)γ'(t).Let(t0,u0)I×Jbe a singular point ofΦ(α,γ)and putx0=α(t0)+u0γ(t0)=Φ(α,γ)(t0,u0).

  • 1. Suppose thatdet(γ(t0),γ'(t0),γ''(t0))0.Then

    • a. The germ ofΦ(α,γ)(I×J)at x 0 is locally diffeomorphic toC×R if u0=λ(t0)andμ(t0)λ'(t0).

    • b. The germ ofΦ(α,γ)(I×J) at x 0 is locally diffeomorphic toSWifu0=λ(t0), μ(t0)=λ'(t0)andμ'(t0)=λ''(t0).

  • 2. Suppose thatdet(γ(t0),γ'(t0),γ''(t0))=0.Then the germ ofΦ(α,γ)(I×J)at x 0 is locally diffeomorphic toCCRifu0=λ(t0), μ(t0)λ'(t0)anddet(γ(t0),γ'(t0),γ(3)(t0))0, [29].

Definition 3. A curve lying on a sphere is called a spherical curve,[27].

Definition 4. Letα:IS2be a unit speed spherical curve. We denote s as the arc-length parameter ofα. Let us denote by

α(s)=α(s),    T(s)=α'(s),    S(s)=α(s)×T(s)

whereT(s)is a unit tangent vector ofα.The frame{α(s),T(s),S(s)}is called the Sabban frame ofαon S 2[27].

3 Spherical circles and constant angle surfaces

A circle of a sphere is a circle that lies on a sphere. A spherical circle can be formed as the intersection of a sphere and a plane, or two spheres. A circle on a sphere whose radius passes through the center of the sphere is called a great circle, otherwise this spherical circle is called the small circle. In this section, a method will be given to obtain constant angle ruled surfaces with the help of small circle on the sphere in Euclidean 3-space E3.

Let S2=(x,y,z)E3x2+y2+z2=1 be a unit sphere in E3 and let {e1,e2} be any orthonormal vectors in this space. We can express a circle on this sphere with the help of these orthonormal bases as follows

α(v)=cosθ(cosve1+sinve2)+sinθ(e1×e2) (8)

If we take θ=0 in above equation, the expression

α(v)=cosve1+sinve2

becomes the great circle with a radius of 1 on the unit sphere. Thus, in order to obtain other circles (small circles), we can construct circles with a certain angle θ and the normal e3=e1×e2 in the plane. By considering the study of Munteanu and Nistor in [2] from a different perspective, we obtain a ruled surface with a constant angle with respect to any direction. The fixed direction is directly related to e3=e1×e2. To find the tangent vector of the curve α(v) on the sphere for θ0, we take the derivative of the (8) with respect to v

α '(v)=cosθ(-sinve1+cosve2) (9)

The norm of the above equation is that

α '(v)=cosθ

So, the unit tangent vector of α(v) is obtained as follows

T(v)=α '(v)α '(v)=-sinve1+cosve2 (10)

If we cross product the curve α(v) and the tangent vector T(v), we get the expression

S(v)=α(v)×T(v)=-sinθ(cosve1+sinve2)+cosθe3. (11)

Thus, the Sabban frame is obtained on the unit sphere as α(v),T(v),S(v) as expressed in Definition 4 in the Preliminaries section. If the necessary calculations are taken, the derivative change of the frame is as follows

ddv    α(v)        T(v)        S(v)    =    0cosθ0        -cosθ0sinθ        0-sinθ0    ×    α(v)        T(v)        S(v)     (12)

In addition, the Darboux vector of the spherical circle α(v) determines the fixed direction as

ω=sinθα(v)+cosθS(v). (13)

In fact, if the necessary calculations are done here, it can be easily seen that

ω=e1×e2=e3.

Theorem 4. Let{e1,e2}be any orthonormal vectors in 3-dimensional Euclidean space. Letαbe the small circle in the unit sphere given as

α(v)=cosθ(cosve1+sinve2)+sinθe3,  θ0

The surfaceΦ(u,v)defined below is a ruled surface

Φ(u,v)=0υf(v)α(v)+g(v)α'(v)dv+uα(v) (14)

wheref(v)andg(v)are the differentiable functions.

Proof. Let α(v) be any small circle on the unit sphere S 2 and Φ(u,v) be the surface. Considering the definition of ruled surfaces, the curve

0υf(v)α(v)+g(v)α'(v)dv

is defined as the ruled surface directrix (also called the base curve) and α(v) is defined as the direction vector of the surface. So, we can easily see that the surface Φ(u,v) is a ruled surface.

Corollary 1. Let

Φ(u,v)=0υf(v)α(v)+g(v)α'(v)dv+uα(v),

be the ruled surface in 3-dimensional Euclidean space.S(v)=α(v)×T(v)is the unit normal of ruled surfaceΦ(u,v)whereα(v)is the small circle on the sphere andT(v)is its unit tangent vector.

Proof. Let Φ(u,v) be the ruled surface in 3-dimensional Euclidean space. To find the unit normal of the surface,

N=Φu×ΦvΦu×Φv,

we firstly calculate the parameter curves of the surface. If the derivatives of Eq. (14) are taken with respect to u and v, respectively, we get

Φu=α(v) (15)

and

Φv=α(v)f(v)+α'(v)(g(v)+u) (16)

If the following calculations are done to find the normal of the surface, we obtain

Φu×Φv=-(g(v)+u)cosθsinθcosve1-(g(v)+u)cosθsinθsinve2+(g(v)+u)cos2θ(e1×e2)

and

Φu×Φv=(g(v)+u)cosθ

So, we can easily find the normal of the surface as follows

N=-sinθcosve1-sinθsinve2+cosθ(e1×e2) (17)

If necessary arrangements are made in the above expression, it can be seen that

N=-sinθ(cosve1+sinve2)+cosθe3, N=S (18)

Thus, we can say that S(v) is the unit normal to the ruled surface Φ(u,v).

Corollary 2. Let the normal of the ruled surfaceΦ(u,v)defined in Eq. (14) be N andω=(e1×e2)=e3be the axis of the constant direction. Then, the surfaceΦ(u,v)is a constant angle ruled surface.

Proof. Let Φ(u,v) be the ruled surface in 3-dimensional Euclidean space. Considering Eq. (17) and axis of the constant direction ω=(e1×e2)=e3, we can easily write that

N,ω=cosθ=constant. (19)

So, we can say that the surface Φ(u,v) is a constant angle ruled surface.

Corollary 3. Let

Φ(u,v)=0υf(v)α(v)+g(v)α'(v)dv+uα(v)

be the ruled surface in 3-dimensional Euclidean space. The surfaceΦ(u,v)is a developable ruled surface.

Proof. Let Φ(u,v) be the ruled surface. If we rename the base curve of the surface Φ(u,v) as

φ=v0f(v)α(v)+g(v)α'(v)dv, (20)

and use the developable ruled surface condition, we obtain that

det(φ '(v),α(v),α'(v))=det(f(v)α(v)+g(v)α'(v),α(v),α'(v)).

If necessary calculations are made, it can be easily seen that this determinant value is zero. So, we can say that Φ(u,v) is a developable ruled surface.

Corollary 4. Let

Φ(u,v)=0υf(v)α(v)+g(v)α'(v)dv+uα(v)

be the ruled surface in 3-dimensional Euclidean space. The line of striction of the surfaceΦ(u,v)is as follows

φ-=φ-g(v)α(v) (21)

where

φ=0υf(v)α(v)+g(v)α'(v)dv

Let Φ(u,v) be the ruled surface. The line of striction of the surface is calculated as follows

φ-=φ-α(v)×α'(v),α(v)×φ'(v)α(v)×α'(v)2α(v) (22)

If the necessary calculations are made in the above expression, we get

α(v)×α'(v)=-sinθcosθcosve1-sinθcosθsinve2+cos2θ(e1×e2) (23)

α(v)×φ'(v)=-g(v)cosθsinθcosve1-g(v)cosθsinθsinve2+g(v)cos2θ(e1×e2) (24)

If the above equations are substituted in Eq. (22), line of striction is obtained as

φ-=φ-g(v)cos2θcos2θα(v),

φ-=φ-g(v)α(v).

Corollary 5. Let

Φ(u,v)=0υf(v)α(v)+g(v)α'(v)dv+uα(v)

be the ruled surface in 3-dimensional Euclidean space. Iff(v)=0 and g(v)=constant,Φ(u,v)is a cone surface.

Let Φ(u,v) be the ruled surface. If the expressions f(v)=0 and g(v)=constant are substituted in the surface equation above, we can easily see that

Φ(u,v)=cα(v)+uα(v),cconstant

Φ(u,v)=(c+u)α(v),cconstant.

So, we can say that Φ(u,v) is a cone surface.

Theorem 5. LetΦ:I×JE3,

Φ(u,v)=0υf(v)α(v)+g(v)α'(v)dv+uα(v)

be a constant angle ruled surface andf,g:IRbe smooth functions with

ddv0υf(v)α(v)+g(v)α'(v)dv =f(v)α(v)+g(v)α'(v)

Also, let(u0,v0)I×Jbe a singular point ofΦ(u,v)and

x0=0υf(v0)α(v0)+g(v0)α'(v0)dv+u0α(v0)=Φ(u0,v0)

The germ ofΦ(u,v)at x 0 is locally diffeomorphic toC×Rand SW. Also, the germ ofΦ(u,v)at x 0 isn’t locally diffeomorphic to CCR.

Proof. Let Φ:I×JE3 be a constant angle ruled surface and f,g:IR be smooth functions. Considering Theorem 3 in Preliminaries section, we are calculated that

det(α(v),   α'(v),α''(v))=sinθcos2θ

  • 1. For θ0 (θπ2,π,...), det(α(v),α'(v),α''(v))0. Then;

    • a. Since u0=g(v0) and f(v0)g'(v0), the germ of Φ(u,v) at x 0 is locally diffeomorphic to C×R.

    • b. Since u0=g(v0), f(v0)=g'(v0) and f'(v0)g ''(v0) the germ of Φ(u,v) at x 0 is locally diffeomorphic to SW.

  • 2. For θ=0 (θ=π2,π,...), det(α(v),α'(v),α''(v))=0.

Although u0=g(v0), f(v0)g'(v0), det(α(v),α'(v),α(3)(v))=0. Hence, the germ of Φ(u,v) at x 0 isn’t locally diffeomorphic to CCR.

Remark 1. Considering the theory in the study, we can say that when we are given any axis, we can create a constant angle surface with the help of this axis. For example, let’s examine the problem of creating a constant angle ruled surface with axis k = e 3 . To find the circleα(v), the circle whose normal is k = e 3 must be written. This is found by writing the intersection curve of the unit sphere and the plane with e 3 normal. Let thee1,e2be an orthonormal vector obtained by Gramm-Schmidt orthonormalization method in the plane whose normal is e 3 . In this case, the intersection curve of the unit sphere and the plane is as follows

cosve1+sinve2

This curve is the great circle with radius length 1. Small circles with radiusr=cosθare as follows

α(v)=cosθcosve1+cosθsinve2+sinθe3

The surface

Φ(u,v)=v0f(v)α(v)+g(v)α'(v)dv+uα(v)

obtained by this spherical circleα(v)is a constant angle ruled surface with the axis k = e 3 . The normal to this surface is

N=sinθcosve1-sinθsinve2+cosθe3,

andN,e3=cosθ.The angle that the surface makes with the axis is determined according to the state of theθangle. Also, when the functions f and g are changed, they change on the constant angle surfaces.

The equations and figures of the constant angle surfaces according to given any direction are discussed in the examples below.

Example 1. Let’s get the equation of the constant angle surface with the axis k=e3=(1/3)(1,1,1) and draw its figures as Fig. 3.

e~1=(1,-1,0), e~2=(0,1,-1)

Figure 3 Constant angle surface for π/4

If the vectors perpendicular to the plane are made orthonormal with the Gramm-Schmidt method, the following vectors are obtained as

e1=12(1,-1,0), e2=16(1,1,-2)

In this case, the spherical circleα(v)with radiusr=cosθis obtained as follows forθ=π/4,

α(v)=(12cosv+123sinv+16,-12cosv+123sinv+16,-13sinv+16).

For the functionsf(v)=v+1andg(v)=v2,if the necessary calculations are done, the equation of the constant angle ruled surface can be easily written as

Φ(u,v)=(Φ1,Φ2,Φ3)

where

Φ1(u,v)=16(3+3v)cosv+(-3+3v)sinv+12ucosv+123usinv+16u,Φ2(u,v)=16(3-3v)cosv+(3+3v)sinv-12ucosv+123usinv+16u,Φ3(u,v)=-13(cosv+vsinv)-13usinv+16u.

If we calculate the singular points for this surface according to Theorem 5, we can write that

det(α(v),α'(v),α''(v))0forθ0θπ2,π,....

a. For f(v0)=v0+1, g'(v0)=2v0,

v0+12v0

and

v01

Since u0=g(v0), we can say that all points as (u0,v0) of Φ(u,v) satisfying the following condition are locally diffeomorphic to C×R

u0=v02,forv01.

b. For f'(v)=1, g'(v)=2v, g ''(v)=2,

f(v0)=v0+1,g'(v0)=2v0

From the equality of the above equations, we obtain that

v0=1.

Considering the following equations,

f'(v0)=1,g ''(v0)=2

we can say that

f'(v0)g ''(v0).

We obtain the other singular point as follows

u0=g(v0)=g(1)=1.

So, the point Φ(u0,v0)=Φ(1,1) is locally diffeomorphic to SW. Also, according to Theorem 5, we know that the germ of Φ(u,v) isn’t locally diffeomorphic to CCR.

Example 2. Let’s get the equation of the constant angle surface with the axis k=e3=(1/3)(2,1,2) and draw its figures as Fig. 4.

e~1=(0,-2,1), e~2=(-1,0,1)

Figure 4 Constant angle surface for π/4

If the vectors perpendicular to the plane are made orthonormal with the Gramm-Schmidt method, the following vectors are obtained as

e1=15(0, -2,1), e2=53-1, 25, 45.

In this case, the spherical circle α(v) with radius r=cosθ is obtained as follows for θ=π/3,

α(v)=(-56sinv+33, -15cosv+515sinv+36, 125cosv+2515sinv+33) (25)

For the functions f(v)=sinv and g(v)=cosv, if the necessary calculations are done, the equation of the constant angle ruled surface can be easily written as

Φ(u,v)=(Φ1,Φ2,Φ3)

where

Φ1(u,v)=-56v-cosv3+-56usinv+33u,

Φ2(u,v)=130(25v-53cosv)-15ucosv+515usinv+36u,

Φ3(u,v)=2v35-cosv3+125ucosv+2515usinv+33u.

References

[1] P. Cermelli, A. J. Di Scala, Constant angle surfaces in liquid crystals, Philos. Mag., 87 (2007) 1871-1888. [ Links ]

[2] M. I. Munteanu and A. I. Nistor, A new approach on constant angle surfaces in E3, Turkish J. Math., 33 (2009) 1-10. [ Links ]

[3] A. I. Nistor, Certain constant angle surfaces constructed on curves, International Electronic Journal of Geometry, 4 (2011) 79-87. [ Links ]

[4] S. Özkaldi and Y. Yayli, Constant angle surfaces and curves in E3, International Electronic Journal of Geometry, 4 (2011) 70-78. [ Links ]

[5] A. T. Ali, A constant angle ruled surfaces, International Journal of Geometry, 7 (2018) 69-80. [ Links ]

[6] C. Y. Li, C. G. Zhu, Construction of the spacelike constant angle surface family in Minkowski 3-space, AIMS Mathematics, 5 (2020) 6341-6354. [ Links ]

[7] S. Özkaldı Karakuş, Certain constant angle surfaces constructed on curves in Minkowski 3-Space, International Electronic Journal of Geometry, 11 (2018) 37-47. [ Links ]

[8] R. López, M. I. Munteanu, Constant angle surfaces in Minkowski space, Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society-Simon Stevin, 18 (2011) 271-286. [ Links ]

[9] F. Dillen, J. Fastenakels, J. Van de Veken , L. Vrancken, Constant angle surfaces in S2 × R, Monatshefte fur Mathematik, 152 (2007) 89-96. [ Links ]

[10] S. Özkaldı Karakuş, Quaternionic approach on constant angle surfaces in S2 × R, Applied Mathematics E-Notes, 19 (2019) 497-506. [ Links ]

[11] F. Dillen, M. I. Munteanu, Constant angle surfaces in H2 × R, Bulletin of the Brazilian Mathematical Society, 40 (2009) 85-97. [ Links ]

[12] J. Fastenakels, M. I. Munteanu and J. Van Der Veken, Constant angle surfaces in the Heisenberg group, Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series, 27 (2011) 747-756. [ Links ]

[13] I. I. Onnis and P. Piu, Constant angle surfaces in the Lorentzian Heisenberg group, Archiv der Mathematik, 109 (2017) 575-589. [ Links ]

[14] F. Doğan and Y. Yayli, On isophote curves and their characterizations, Turkish Journal of Mathematics, 39 (2015) 650-664. [ Links ]

[15] C. E. Ordoñez, E. Blotta and J. I. Pastore, Isophote based low computing power eye detection embedded system, IEEE Latin America Transactions, 18 (2020) 336-343. [ Links ]

[16] S. Datta, N. Chaki, B. Modak, A novel technique to detect caries lesion using isophote concepts, IRBM, 40 (2019) 174-182. [ Links ]

[17] T. Körpinar, R. C. Demirkol, Z. Körpinar, Polarization of propagated light with optical solitons along the fiber in de-sitter space S 2 1, Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 226 (2021) 165872. [ Links ]

[18] T. Körpinar, R.C. Demirkol, Electromagnetic curves of the linearly polarized light wave along an optical fiber in a 3D Riemannian manifold with Bishop equations, Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 200 (2020) 163334. [ Links ]

[19] Z. Özdemir, A new calculus for the treatment of Rytov’s law in the optical fiber, Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 216 (2020) 164892. [ Links ]

[20] B. Yilmaz, A new type electromagnetic curves in optical fiber and rotation of the polarization plane using fractional calculus, Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 247 (2021) 168026. [ Links ]

[21] Z. Özdemir, F. N. Ekmekci, Electromagnetic curves and Rytov curves based on the hyperbolic split quaternion algebra, Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 251 (2022) 168359. [ Links ]

[22] D. J. Struik, Lectures on classical differential geometry (Massachusetts), (Addison-Wesley Publishing company, Inc, 1961). [ Links ]

[23] S. Izumiya and N. Takeuchi, New special curves and developable surfaces, Turk J Math, 28 (2004) 153-163. [ Links ]

[24] Hacısalihoğlu H.H. Diferensiyel Geometri, (Inönü üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayınları, 1983). [ Links ]

[25] A. Sabuncuoğlu, Diferensiyel Geometri, (Nobel Basımevi, Ankara, 2004). [ Links ]

[26] M. Özdemir, Diferansiyel Geometri, (Altı Nokta Yayınevi, İzmir, 2020). [ Links ]

[27] M. P. Do Carmo, Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs., New Jersey, 1976). [ Links ]

[28] S. Izumiya, N. Takeuchi, Singularities of ruled surfaces in R3, In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Cambridge University Press, 130 (2001) 1-11. [ Links ]

[29] S. Izumiya, Generating families of developable surfaces in R3, Hokkaido University preprint series in mathematics, 512 (2001) 1-18. [ Links ]

Received: July 02, 2022; Accepted: January 10, 2023

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License