SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.78 número3Prevalencia de hidronefrosis en mujeres con prolapso de órganos pélvicos avanzadoReposicionamiento retrocapsular en un paciente con extrusión de prótesis peneana índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de urología

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4085versión impresa ISSN 0185-4542

Rev. mex. urol. vol.78 no.3 Ciudad de México may./jun. 2018  Epub 25-Jun-2021

https://doi.org/10.24245/revmexurol.v78i3.1834 

Casos clínicos

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: implementation of digital insertion and dissection as an adjunct to the technique

Nefrolitotomía percutánea: implementación de la inserción y disección digital como coadyuvante de la técnica

José Rodrigo Arellano-Cuadros1 

Javier Pineda-Murillo1 

Jesús Torres-Aguilar1 

Ana Fátima R. Sandoval-Salazar1 

1Department of Urology, Hospital Juárez de México, Mexico City, Mexico.


Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was established as a minimally invasive treatment option for kidney stones in the 1970s and is considered a safe and effective procedure, with stone clearance rates of 78-95%. The ideal puncture should maximize the effectiveness of the procedure in terms of stone-free status and minimize the risk of complications.

CLINICAL CASE:

We present the case of a 36-year-old male patient with bilateral lower back pain. A CT urography scan was performed that revealed bilateral lithiasis. The stone on the right side was consistent with an incomplete staghorn stone and a right retrorenal colon was identified. Left flexible nephrolithotripsy and subsequent right percutaneous nephrolithotomy were performed. A puncture was made under fluoroscopic guidance supported by previous digital dissection of all layers of the abdominal wall until gaining access to the retroperitoneum. Colonic lesion was prevented and a tunnel through which the renal unit could be palpated was formed.

CONCLUSIONS:

The technique of digital insertion and dissection offers safe access to the renal unit that is useful in patients presenting with risk factors for a potential complication.

Keywords: Digital; Kidney; Lithiasis; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Resumen

ANTECEDENTES:

La nefrolitotomía percutánea (PCNL) se estableció como una opción de tratamiento mínimamente invasiva para los cálculos renales desde la década de 1970, es segura y eficaz (tasas de aclaramiento lítico del 78 hasta 95%). La punción ideal debe maximizar la efectividad del procedimiento en términos de tasa libre de cálclulos renales y minimizar el riesgo de complicaciones.

CASO CLÍNICO:

Paciente masculino de 36 años de edad con dolor lumbar bilateral. En la urotomografía se apreció litiasis bilateral, la derecha compatible con un lito coraliforme incompleto y un colon retrorrenal derecho. Primero se practicó nefrolitotricia flexible izquierda y posteriormente nefrolitotomía percutánea derecha. Se efectuó una punción bajo guía fluoroscópica apoyada mediante una disección digital de todas las capas de la pared abdominal hasta acceder al retroperitoneo para evitar una lesión colónica y formar un túneal a través del que se logró palpar la unidad renal.

CONCLUSIONES:

La técnica de punción y dilatación digitalizada ofrece un acceso seguro y efectivo en pacientes con factores de riesgo de complicaciones por cálculos renales.

Palabras clave: Nefrolitotomía percutánea; litiasis; riñón

INTRODUCTION

Kidney stone disease has been described since the time of Hippocrates. It affects 5-15% of the world population, with recurrence rates close to 50%.1 Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was developed in 1976 by Fernstrom and Johansson and established as a minimally invasive treatment option for the removal of kidney stones in the 1970s.2 Currently, the European Association of Urology (EAU) clinical guidelines panel recommends percutaneous nephrolithotomy as the first-line treatment for kidney stones measuring 2 cm, lower pole stones of 1.5 cm, and staghorn stones.3-5 It has almost completely replaced open surgery, because it is less invasive, safer, and more effective (stone-free rates of 78 to 95%).6 Traditionally, the prone position was exclusively considered for renal access. In 1987, Valdivia-Uria reported the first percutaneous access to the kidney with the patient in the supine position. Multiple position modifications emerged in an effort to simplify the procedure and improve its efficiency, marking the beginning of the era of combined intrarenal endoscopic surgery.7 Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy achieves excellent results with a low rate of complications, and is equal in effectiveness and safety to the prone position. Adequate access to the renal collecting system, whether in the prone position, supine position, or any of the modified positions, is one of the most important aspects required for successful surgery.8 The ideal puncture should maximize the effectiveness of the procedure in terms of the stone-free rate and minimize the risk of complications.9 Stone removal depends on adequate puncture, with the preferred site being between the lower edge of the 12th rib and the upper border of the posterior iliac crest. Punctures above the 12th and 11th ribs have a 16- and 46-fold increased risk of intrathoracic complications, respectively, compared with subcostal access.10 The puncture should be medial to the posterior axillary line to avoid injury to the colon. In addition, the puncture should be sufficiently distant from the rib to avoid injury to the intercostal nerve or vessels. Puncture through the infundibulum of the upper, middle, and lower poles is associated with vascular lesions in 67.6, 38.4, and 68.2% of cases, respectively. Direct puncture of the renal pelvis can injure the retroperitoneal vessels. An important step is the dilation of the tract with the insertion of the access sheath.11 Effective renal puncture and dilatation are of paramount importance for surgical success.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 36-year-old male patient that had a surgical history of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and an otherwise unremarkable personal medical history. He sought medical attention for bilateral, colicky, intermittent, and predominantly right-sided lumbar pain of 3-month progression, with no other accompanying symptoms. Complete laboratory work-up revealed abundant erythrocytes per field, as well as calcium oxalate crystals in the urinalysis. An abdominopelvic CT scan was performed that revealed bilateral hyperdense images. The right image was consistent with an incomplete staghorn calculus, with an attenuation index of up to 1410 Hounsfield units (HU). A right retrograde colon was also identified. Urine culture was negative and prophylactic antibiotic therapy was initiated. Left flexible nephrolithotripsy and the placement of an ipsilateral double catheter were indicated in a first surgery, followed by right percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Surgical technique

The procedure was performed under general anesthesia with the patient in the modified Valdivia position (Figure 1). Cystoscopy with a 22-French (Fr) cystoscope was performed by inserting a 6-Fr ureteral catheter, followed by 16-Fr Foley transurethral catheter placement and a retrograde pyelogram. The distance between the last rib and the iliac crest was measured, achieving subcostal renal access through the posterior axillary line. An incision of approximately 1.5 cm and digital dissection of all layers of the anterolateral abdominal wall was made until the retroperitoneum was reached, forming a tunnel through which the renal unit was finally palpated (Figure 2). A puncture under fluoroscopic guidance (C-arm in a 90-degree fixed position) was made with a Chiba 22 G needle (Cook Medical Inc) at the level of the lower calyx, facilitated by distension with saline injection and contrast medium through the ureteral catheter with renal opacification (Figure 3). Urine was then assessed to confirm proper puncture, and a SensorTM guidewire (PTFE-Nitinol Guidewire with Hydrophilic Tip) was introduced into the ureter, with subsequent sequential dilation of the tract with Amplatz dilators up to 30-Fr in diameter (Figure 4). A 26-Fr nephroscope (KARL STORZ GmbH & Co. KG) was introduced, and pneumatic lithotripsy with LithoClast Master equipment was performed (Electro Medical Systems, Nyon, Switzerland). Flexible nephroscopy was carried out to assess the renal cavities. At the end of the procedure, an 18-Fr, 3-mL-volume nephrostomy catheter was inserted into the balloon, and nephrostography was performed. Total surgery duration was 100 minutes. The patient received standard postoperative care, his progression was satisfactory, and he was discharged from the hospital 48 h after the procedure. The nephrostomy was left in place for one week and removed when the stone-free status was corroborated. The patient is currently under multidisciplinary management by the endocrinology and urology services and is considered at high-risk for stone formation due to hypercalciuria. He is presently being treated with potassium citrate.

Figure 1 The modified Valdivia position. 

Figure 2 Digital incision and dissection of the abdominal wall layers with renal palpation. 

Figure 3 Renal puncture under fluoroscopic guidance through the digital tract with urine collection. 

Figure 4 Digital identification of the renal puncture site (A). Nitinol guidewire with hydrophilic tip directed towards the ureter (B). Sequential dilation of the tract with Amplatz type dilators (C)

DISCUSSION

The complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy can be divided into those related to access and those related to stone retrieval. The rate of complications reported during percutaneous nephrolithotomy ranges from 3 to 18%. Complications related to initial percutaneous access and dilatation of the tract include renal or parenchymal bleeding (perinephric hematomas), failed access, chest complications (pneumothorax or pleural effusion) and injury of the main renal vessels (<0.5% cases). There is inherent danger to adjacent organs when accessing the renal collecting system, especially to the colon, liver, and spleen. A retrorenal position places those organs at even greater risk. The risk factors for colon injury are distention of the colon, decreased perirenal fat, a left-side procedure, advanced age, female sex, horseshoe kidney, and previous renal surgery.12-13 In the supine position, the risk of perforation of the colon (0.5%) is lower because the intestine floats freely in the abdomen away from the kidney.14 Compared with single access, multiple access entails an increased risk of bleeding and complications, including a detrimental effect on renal function.15 The digital insertion and dissection technique does not cause problems for the movement of the access sheath or leakage of saline solution with its instillation during the procedure, nor is bleeding modified. The results are comparable to the conventional technique with the advantage of preventing potential complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Obtaining optimal renal access and dilation are crucial in percutaneous nephrolithotomy and are difficult tasks for many urologists. Careful patient selection and accurate positioning are essential. We believe that the technique described above offers more secure access to the renal unit and is highly useful in patients with risk factors for potential complications. The experience at our hospital center has been favorable. However, further study is needed to confirm the benefits of this technique over those of the standard procedure.

REFERENCES

1 Heer R, Veeratterapillay R, Haslam P, Hasan ST. A review and illustration of contemporary percutaneous nephrolithotomy practice using intracorporeal techniques through single punctures for complex stone burden in a UK tertiary referral centre. Br J Med Surg Urol. 2010;(3):144-150. [ Links ]

2 Amón JH, Pérez-Fentes D, Resel L, Galán JA, Serrano A, Servera A, et al. El aprendizaje de la nefrolitectomía percutánea en posición supina. Estudio observacional multicéntrico. Actas Urol Esp. 2013;37(4):214-220. [ Links ]

3 Ghani KR, Andonian S, Bultitude M, Desai M, Giusti G, Okhunov Z, et al. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Update, Trends, and Future Directions. Eur Urol. 2016;(70):382-396. [ Links ]

4 Mak DKC, Smith Y, Buchholz N, El-Husseiny T. What is better in percutaneous nephrolithotomy-Prone or supine? A systematic review. Arab J Urol. 2016;(14):101-107. [ Links ]

5 Karaolides T, Moraitis K, Bach C, Masood J, Buchholz N. Positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Thirty-five years of evolution. Arab J Urol. 2012;(10):307-316. [ Links ]

6 Ganpule AP, Vijayakumar M, Malpani A, Desai MR. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) a critical review. Int J Surg. 2016;(36):660-664. [ Links ]

7 Duty B, Okhunov Z, Smith A, Okeke Z. The Debate Over Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Positioning: A Comprehensive Review. J Urol. 2011;(186);20-25. [ Links ]

8 Miller NL, Matlaga BR, Lingeman JE. Techniques for Fluoroscopic Percutaneous Renal Access. J Urol. 2007;(178):15-23. [ Links ]

9 Zapata-González JA, Ramirez-Perez EA, López-Alvarado D, Corona-Martínez J. Acceso percutáneo al cáliz superior en posición supina: experiencia inicial. Rev Mex Urol. 2015;75(5):253-259. [ Links ]

10 El-Karamany T. A supracostal approach for percutaneous nephrolithotomy of staghorn calculi: A prospective study and review of previous reports. Arab J Urol. 2012;(10):358-366. [ Links ]

11 Nour HH, Kamal AM, Zayed AS, Refaat H, Badawy MH, El-Leithy TR. Single-step renal dilatation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomised study. Arab J Urol. 2014;(12):219-222. [ Links ]

12 El-Assmy AM, Shokeir AA, Mohsen T, El-Tabey N, El-Nahas AR, Shoma AM, et al. Renal Access by Urologist or Radiologist for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy-Is It Still an Issue? J Urol. 2007;(178):916-920. [ Links ]

13 Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007;(51):899-906. [ Links ]

14 Nour HH, Kamal AM, Ghobashi SE, Zayed AS, Rushdy MM, El-Baz AG, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: Safety and outcomes in a single-centre experience. Arab J Urol. 2013;(11):62-67. [ Links ]

15 Antonelli JA, Pearle MS. Advances in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Urol Clin N Am. 2013;(40):99-113. [ Links ]

Received: November 2017; Accepted: May 2018

Correspondence: Javier Pineda-Murillo xavpineda@gmail.com

This article should be cited as

Arellano-Cuadros JR, Pineda-Murillo J, Torres-Aguilar J, Sandoval-Salazar AFR. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: implementation of puncture and digital dilation as an adjunct to the technique. Rev Mex Urol. 2018 mayo-junio;78(3): 202-206.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License