SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.12 suppl.3Control y prevención de nematodosis en pequeños rumiantes: antecedentes, retos y perspectivas en MéxicoResultados e impacto de la investigación en genética y mejoramiento genético de las abejas melíferas desarrollada por el INIFAP en México índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias

versão On-line ISSN 2448-6698versão impressa ISSN 2007-1124

Rev. mex. de cienc. pecuarias vol.12  supl.3 Mérida Nov. 2021  Epub 24-Jan-2022

https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v12s3.5801 

Reviews

Important infectious diseases in goat production in Mexico: history, challenges and outlook

Gabriela Palomares Reséndiza 

Francisco Aguilar Romeroa 

Carlos Flores Pérezb 

Luis Gómez Núñeza 

José Gutiérrez Hernándeza 

Enrique Herrera Lópeza 

Magdalena Limón Gonzálezb 

Francisco Morales Álvareza 

Francisco Pastor Lópezc 

Efrén Díaz Aparicioa  * 

a Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP). CENID Salud Animal e Inocuidad. Carretera México -Toluca, colonia Palo Alto, 05110. Ciudad de México. México.

bUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Programa de Maestría y Doctorado en Ciencias de la Producción y de la Salud Animal. Ciudad de México, México.

cINIFAP. CE La Laguna, Matamoros, Coahuila, México.


Abstract

Goat production in Mexico is concentrated in poorer areas in arid and semi-arid areas of the country’s north and center, particularly in the Mixtec region of Oaxaca, Guerrero and Puebla. Because goats can survive in near desert conditions their production of milk and animals is a valuable nutritional contribution to human diets in these areas. Disease in goats in Mexico has generally received scant attention, however researchers at the INIFAP have studied this species and its pathologies. This review focuses on the main diseases affecting goats in Mexico and the research in this area by the INIFAP. In most of the goat herds studied in Mexico reproductive disorders are often caused by diseases such as brucellosis, leptospirosis and chlamydia, all considered to be endemic and potentially zoonotic. Respiratory and gastrointestinal disorders are the main ailments in kids. High frequencies of arthritic encephalitis, a disease caused by infection with small ruminant lentiviruses, and paratuberculosis and caseous lymphadenitis, both bacterial in origin, have been documented in productive-age goats throughout Mexico. All three are chronic, causing producers to mistakenly assume they have no major impact on productivity. Q fever, a known zoonotic, is currently considered exotic in Mexico, but in other countries is frequently associated with reproductive disorders, abortions and occasional respiratory problems in goats. The INIFAP has addressed all the above diseases. It was instrumental in diagnosing and controlling brucellosis, the principal bacterial zoonosis in Mexico. Researchers at INIFAP have also helped to determine that diseases previously considered exotic in Mexico have become endemic, and then developing the tools needed for their diagnosis. The INIFAP has made vital contributions to understanding the national disease panorama in goats and transferring diagnostic and treatment technologies to livestock laboratories nationwide.

Key words Goats; Diseases; Research

Resumen

La importancia de las cabras en México radica en que su producción se concentra en zonas áridas y semiáridas del norte y el centro del país, y particularmente en la región de la Mixteca en los estados de Oaxaca, Guerrero y Puebla, donde prevalece la pobreza y donde la especie, es capaz de sobrevivir y producir leche y cabritos. El estudio de las enfermedades de las cabras en México es escaso; el INIFAP se ha caracterizado por nunca haber dejado de lado la investigación en esta especie. En esta revisión, se abordan las principales enfermedades que afectan a las cabras en México y se describen las investigaciones que sobre ellas ha desarrollado el INIFAP. Los problemas de salud que enfrentan la mayoría de los rebaños caprinos en los que se ha realizado investigación, demuestran que algunos trastornos reproductivos son causados por enfermedades como brucelosis, leptospirosis y clamidiasis, todas éstas consideradas endémicas y con potencial zoonótico. Por otra parte, los problemas de tipo respiratorio y digestivo son los principales padecimientos que afectan a los cabritos. En las cabras en etapa productiva del territorio nacional, se ha demostrado una frecuencia elevada de animales con artritis encefalitis, enfermedad causada por la infección de Lentivirus de los pequeños rumiantes, paratuberculosis y linfadenitis caseosa, estas últimas de origen bacteriano; una particularidad de estas tres enfermedades es su característica de cronicidad, lo que hace pensar de manera equívoca al productor que su presencia no tiene mayor impacto dentro de los rebaños. Finalmente, se ha logrado detectar la presencia de la fiebre Q, una enfermedad zoonotica actualmente considerada exótica en México, y que en otros países es frecuentemente asociada con trastornos reproductivos, abortos y ocasionalmente, problemas respiratorios en los animales. En las aportaciones del INIFAP hay que destacar el diagnóstico y el control de la brucelosis, que es la principal zoonosis bacteriana en nuestro país; además de haber contribuido a que enfermedades consideradas exóticas en México, se determine que ya son endémicas, y se cuente con las herramientas para su diagnóstico, siendo un reto para nuestro instituto realizar la transferencia de estas tecnologías a los laboratorios de diagnóstico de nuestro país.

Palabras clave Caprinos; Enfermedades; Investigación

The importance of goat farming in Mexico

The goat population in Mexico is currently 8,791,8941, most of which is distributed in the states of Zacatecas, San Luis Potosí, Coahuila, Puebla and Oaxaca. All have a traditional cuisine that includes goat meat in dishes such as birria, cabrito, mole de caderas and barbacoa. Specialized meat production or dual-purpose breeds, such as Boer and Nubia, have been developed, but most of the goat population continues to be Creole or local animals, which are descendants of Spanish breeds. Specialized dairy breeds, such as Saanen, French Alpine, Toggenburg and Nubia, are found mainly in the states of Coahuila, Guanajuato, Durango, Jalisco and Chihuahua1; cheese, cajeta (caramel) and candys are produced from goat’s milk in these states2.

Goat farmers in the Bajío region of central Mexico and those in northern Mexico have technified production more than those of the south, such as in the Mixtec and Guerrero regions. This is probably due to the primary focus of production being milk to supply several companies that produce goat dairy products. Even so, regional production systems in Mexico are predominantly heterogeneous, utilize traditional technology, face myriad animal health problems, and suffer from minimal organization among producers and throughout the value chain3.

Goats’ importance as producers of food and valued-added derivatives is more pronounced in arid and semi-arid areas, which is also where human populations tend to be poorer. Goats are capable of utilizing the vegetation found in these areas, making it the preferred livestock for its ability to adapt and produce, even in challenging desert conditions4.

Brucellosis

Brucellosis melitensis is the principal etiological agent of brucellosis in goats. It is also the main species of the genus and is considered to be one of the causative agents of human brucellosis, known as Malta fever5. Transmission of B. melitensis is principally oral, normally through intake of food or water contaminated with vaginal secretions or the remains of abortions from infected animals. For smooth phenotype brucellae, venereal transmission is not generally accepted as a main route of infection. However, B. melitensis is excreted in the milk and colostrum, suggesting that most latent infections may be contracted through their consumption5.

Infected cattle manifest clinical signs that can have substantial financial impacts. In sexually mature females it causes reduced fertility, abortion and decreased milk production. In males it colonizes the reproductive system, causing orchitis and epididymitis. Cases of arthritis have also been reported6.

Serological diagnosis of brucellosis in goats is most commonly done with the card test using 3 % B. abortus antigen. Its sensitivity is near 100 %, and it is also simple, inexpensive and practical. However, this test cannot be used in goats vaccinated with Rev 1 at any dose until 8 mo post vaccination. Before eight months the test cannot differentiate between antibodies generated in response to the vaccine and those generated in response to infection. In these cases, techniques such as radial immunodiffusion (IDR) with native hapten are used because they allow differentiation between vaccinated and infected animals7.

In Mexico. Brucellosis is the main bacterial zoonosis in the country. Its control relies on diagnosis, identification of infected animals, their elimination, and especially vaccination. Goat farmers (especially in poorer goat farming communities), veterinarians, and slaughterhouse workers are the most vulnerable human populations, but laboratory personnel and consumers of unpasteurized dairy products are also at risk5.

Contributions from research at INIFAP

The National Campaign against Animal Brucellosis was restarted in Mexico in the late 1990s. At this time there was still limited scientific data on the protection conferred by the Rev 1 vaccine in goats. To date, this has been the only available option worldwide for preventing brucellosis in small ruminants. Using experimental challenge techniques, INIFAP researchers have evaluated the protection conferred against brucellae. They found that application of reduced doses of Rev 1 were sufficient to protect vaccinated goats in endemic areas for at least 5 yr after immunization. These results are the first of their kind worldwide; they scientifically support that the Rev 1 vaccine protects vaccinated goats throughout their life and that revaccination is therefore unnecessary8,9. Based on these results a reduced dose of Rev 1 was implemented during the National Campaign against Animal Brucellosis.

There has also been a notorious lack of scientific information on the sensitivity and specificity of caprine brucellosis diagnosis tests. In their evaluations of diagnostic tests INIFAP researchers have found that techniques used with success in cattle, such as the milk ring and rivanol tests, did not generate effective diagnosis of brucellosis in goats. This research found that the card test, which is both basic and an important screening technique for serological diagnosis of brucellosis in animals, should be used at a 3 % cell concentration, a modification which increased its sensitivity. In goats, this screening test exhibits 98 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity as determined by Official Mexican Standards (Norma Oficial Mexicana - NOM). The antigen preparation methodology developed by INIFAP was transferred to the National Veterinary Biological Production Company (Productora Nacional de Biológicos Veterinarios - PRONABIVE)10,11.

In an effort to test a widely held dogma that male goats cannot be vaccinated against brucellosis due to development of lesions in the reproductive organs from bacterial tropism, researchers from the INIFAP and the UNAM conducted a study with 48 six-mo-old kids from brucellosis-free herds. They found that both the tested vaccines exhibited a low colonization capacity in the reproductive tract, and that this dogma was a myth12.

Challenges and outlook in Mexico

Over the short-term, changes and updates can be expected in the National Campaign against Brucellosis in Animals (Official Mexican Standard, NOM-041-ZOO-1995). Over the medium-term, disease control programs need to be implemented and adapted to the particular conditions of the goat farming regions throughout Mexico. If the short- and medium-term goals are met then over the long-term, it is possible that caprine brucellosis could be controlled.

Chlamydiosis

Chlamydiosis is an infectious-contagious and zoonotic disease caused by bacteria of the genus Chlamydia. The species that most affects goats is C. abortus, an obligate intracellular bacterium with an asynchronous multimorphic development cycle13. It has been reported to affect pregnant women, mainly after exposure to infected goats13.

In goats, chlamydiosis is characterized as causing abortions in the last two or three weeks of gestation, or birth of weak offspring13. Abortion generally occurs without previous signs, although behavioral changes and vaginal discharges containing a large number of elementary bodies can occur between 24 to 48 h beforehand. Placental lesions develop initially in the hilum of the placentaloma and extend to the intercotyledonary membranes. This leads to destruction of placental tissue which affects nutrient acquisition and hormonal regulation, resulting in premature expulsion of the fetus. Histological changes in the placenta and appearance of lesions typically occur after 90 d gestation13.

In Mexico. The first report of isolation of chlamydiosis’ etiological agent in goats was published in 199714. Initially considered exotic in Mexico, C. abortus is now viewed as common in goats based on increasing evidence. For example, a 2015 study was aimed at isolating C. abortus in dairy goats from herds with abortion problems in the state of Guanajuato, and developing adequate diagnostic tests for its detection15. Analysis by ELISA of serum samples and vaginal swabs taken from six goat herds found that 9.60 % of the evaluated animals were seropositive for C. abortus. A PCR analysis using vaginal exudate DNA identified 23.8 % positive animals, and Chlamydia spp. was isolated in 26.98 % of the sampled animals. These three diagnostic methods were complementary, and all were applied in areas where Chlamydia is suspected of causing abortions. The combined results confirmed that this pathogen is present in dairy goat herds in Mexico15. In a 2016 study, 1,307 serological samples were collected from goats distributed in 14 municipalities in Guanajuato, and analyzed using indirect ELISA. Frequency in females with a history of abortion was 46.62 %, whereas it was 27.13 % in females with at least one parturition that were clinically healthy but lived with females that tended to abort16. A study done in Culiacán, in the state of Sinaloa, identified the presence of C. abortus in a goat herd with abortion problems, further supporting its presence in the country17.

Contributions from research at INIFAP

The first isolation of C. abortus in goats in Mexico was achieved as part of a collaboration between researchers from the then INIP and the UNAM14. From 2012 to 2013, a total of 186 samples were collected from 49 herds in the states of Coahuila, Jalisco, Puebla, Veracruz and Querétaro. After bacterial isolation, PCR and sequencing, analysis of the amplification products found 99% homology with four C. abortus strains: A.22, FAS, S26, EBA and VPG18. In an analysis of goats from various municipalities in Guanajuato, C. abortus was identified in goats from herds with abortion problems, even in herds administered tetracyclines in an attempt to prevent it. Analysis of samples from organs and vaginal exudate corroborated that the treatment does not prevent infection, and may or may not cause abortion19.

Challenges and outlook in Mexico

Regional livestock laboratories need to have the ability to run end-point PCR and real-time PCR to correctly diagnosis chlamydiosis, generate data on the Chlamydia species affecting goats and thus establish effective prevention and control measures within herds17,19. Improved diagnosis will require development of routine techniques, such as serological tests like ELISA20.

Colibacillosis

Colibacillosis is caused by Escherichia coli, and one of the main conditions caused by this bacterium is diarrhea in goat kids. Two main forms of the disease are recognized: enteric and systemic colibacillosis. The enteric form affects animals 2 to 8 d of age in which it causes diarrhea that is usually yellowish white in color, and creamy to almost liquid in consistency, while the kid exhibits weakness, cachexia and dehydration. If not quickly and adequately treated, infected animals can die within 12 h of clinical onset. The systemic, or septicemic, form affects animals between two to 6 wk of age. The bacteria crosses the intestinal or respiratory mucosa and enters the circulatory stream, causing animals to exhibit higher rectal temperature, meningitis and arthritis, but without diarrhea. Infected animals are the most important source of transmission, the most common route being fecal-oral. Reducing exposure to E. coli is attained through proper hygiene and handling practices. Lack of colostrum makes kids more susceptible to diarrhea21.

In Mexico. One of the two main causes of mortality in goat kids is diarrhea22. Little research has been done on the pathogenic mechanisms and identification of virulence genes involved in E. coli diarrhea in goats. Most of the strains isolated from animals have been enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), which express adhesins and enterotoxins as pathogenicity factors, and cause neonatal enteritis. Other pathogens isolated from diseased animals include enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), which also cause diarrhea, and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), a known pathogen in humans23. The EHEC pathotype O157:H7 infects humans and its reservoirs are ruminants. Fecal contamination of water and other foods, as well as cross contamination during food preparation (with contaminated meat products, surfaces and kitchen utensils), are common infection routes24.

Contributions from research at INIFAP

A study done in 2014 characterized E. coli isolates from diarrhea collected from kids in some of Mexico’s goat-producing regions. Most of the isolates were found to belong to the B1 phylogenetic group of the O25:H8 serotype. This group and serotype have a wide variety of virulence genes, particularly st and stx2, which combine in the EHEC and ETEC pathotypes, as well as exhibiting low resistance to pharmaceutical treatment25,26. Using three of the isolated strains, a bacterin was developed to control the disease. When administered to pregnant goats it provided passive immunity to kids through colostrum, with only 2.31 % of the vaccinated females producing kids with diarrhea. In addition, administration of the bacterin raised antibody levels in vaccinated females and their offspring. The protection provided the animals was identified as a serotype specifically against purified O25 LPS (27.

Challenges and outlook in Mexico

Research is still needed into the behavior of the virulence genes involved in E. coli diarrhea to develop an exact diagnosis that would allow identifying and developing specific preventive measures. The bacterin developed at INIFAP for E. coli diarrhea prevention in kids is promising and should be included in the development of immunization protocols.

Respiratory disease complex (RDC)

The causes of RDC in goats include the environment, animal condition and the presence of infectious agents such as viruses and bacteria. Kids are particularly susceptible to RDC. The adverse environmental conditions that predispose goats to respiratory problems are sudden changes in climate, overcrowding of animals, inadequate pens, lack of ventilation, accumulation of dust and ammonia, poor protection against drafts and stress from transportation28. Among infectious agents, some viruses are known to be primary agents, particularly the parainfluenza-3 and respiratory syncytial viruses29. The bacteria that can generate RDC include Pasteurella multocida, Mannheimia haemolytica, and Mycoplasma spp., all commonly found in the upper respiratory tract of healthy animals30. When immune system mechanisms become depressed these bacteria colonize the lungs, causing RDC. Various host-related factors can contribute to development of RDC or pneumonia. These include deficient colostrum intake in kids, damage from viruses in the mucociliary clearance system (which causes insufficient bacterial clearance from airways), a depressed immune system, malnutrition, parasitosis, dehydration, etc. When pneumonia occurs, symptoms can range from 40 to 41 ºC fevers, cough, shortness of breath, lack of appetite, mucopurulent nasal and ocular discharge, depression, prostration and death31.

In Mexico. Goat producers in Mexico recognize pneumonia as one of the most frequent health problems in herds, but rarely is a diagnosis made or a prevention program implemented22.

Contributions of research carried out at INIFAP

The INIFAP began research on this problem by identifying and characterizing the virulence factors of the bacteria participating in RDC, finding P. multocida (biotype D:3) to be present in goats. A valuable complement to this study would be to isolate lesion microorganisms directly from the lungs of diseased individuals to confirm that this strain (and/or others) is the cause of pneumonia32-35.

Challenges and outlook in Mexico

Controlling RDC in goats in Mexico will require creation of a vaccination program and producer education. An important aim is formulation of a M. haemolytica toxoid from isolates collected in Mexico and its evaluation in kids, together with the bacterin already developed. The results would contribute to implementing a vaccination program to prevent RDC. Training courses are needed for goat farmers that focus on improving RDC prevention. These can use a comprehensive approach that reviews and corrects problems leading to RDC factors, such as management practices that generate excessive stress, while promoting adequate hygiene protocols, reviewing nutritional status, identifying parasitosis status, and improving production installations (e.g. redesign to prevent sudden temperature changes, and provide proper ventilation).

Q fever

A worldwide zoonotic disease, Q fever is caused by the bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Its hosts are myriad, and range from domestic (cows, sheep, goats, dogs, cats, rabbits) to wild animals (small rodents, foxes). Most hosts are chronic carriers and do not suffer from the disease, but they excrete the bacteria via urine, feces, milk, and birth by-products such as amniotic fluid, the placenta and abortions. These secretions form aerosols that can transmit the microorganism by air to susceptible human populations36.

In Mexico. Coxiella burnetii is an exotic species in Mexico, and as such has been considered by SADER as a notifiable disease since 199437. The first serological evidence of this bacterium in animals was reported in the state of Baja California in 199038, and the first reports of it in humans were from the Comarca Lagunera region39.

Contributions from research at INIFAP

In a study done from 2018 to 2019, researchers from the INIFAP and the Ministry of Health identified C. burnetii in goats that exhibited a tendency to abort. Using endpoint PCR, they identified the IS1111 insertion sequence; this was the first molecular evidence that goats in Mexico can be reservoirs of C. burnetii40.

Challenges and outlook in Mexico

Over the short-term, C. burnetii will probably transition from being an exotic to an endemic disease. Research will also be needed to develop diagnostic tests. Over the medium-term, high sensitivity and specificity diagnostic tests need to be established in laboratories to detect Q fever in both animals and humans, and programs developed and implemented to control the disease in animals.

Small ruminant lentivirus

Caprine arthritis encephalitis virus (CAEV) and Maedi-Visna virus show genetic, structural and pathogenic similarities; consequently, they have been reclassified as small ruminant lentiviruses (SRLV)41. In goat production, SRLV can have negative financial impacts directly related to the presence of multisystemic and incurable chronic-degenerative infections. In adult goats, arthritis and mastitis occur, while in kids the viruses manifest in the nervous system during the first months of age42. Replication of lentiviruses in mammary gland epithelial cells plays an important role in viral particle transmission. Mononuclear cells and infected macrophages can also be shed through colostrum and milk. Direct contact with aerosolized respiratory secretions, urine, and feces from infected animals are considered sources of infection that can become exacerbated by overcrowding. Water and feed, as well as inadequate disinfection of facilities, machinery and milking equipment, allow the spread of SRLV43.

In Mexico. A seroprevalence study of CAEV in Mexico’s goat-producing regions in 1985 determined that the disease entered the country through import of live breeding animals from the United States44. The SAGARPA subsequently classified CAEV as an endemic disease and required mandatory monthly reporting. It was isolated, and sequencing done of the entire genome of a recombinant SRLV belonging to the B1 subtype45.

Contributions from research at INIFAP

INIFAP researchers are developing SRLV diagnostic techniques based on the genetic and antigenic characteristics of strains that circulate naturally in Mexico and which affect goat production. Expression of a recombinant antigen of the CAEV p25 protein has been achieved in the E. coli system. The generated antigens are considered to be excellent candidates for establishing an ELISA-type serological test for CAEV diagnosis46. In addition, a real-time PCR test is being standardized to identify the presence of provirus in SRLV and the production of the recombinant proteins CA, p25 and MA, p16 in CAEV.

Challenges and outlooks in Mexico

Further research is needed to understand the circulation of other SRLV genetic groups in Mexico and to identify their genetic diversity. To date, the B1 genogroup has been identified and found capable of infecting both sheep and goats. Tools and techniques have been developed for serological and molecular diagnosis of subtype B1 (ELISA and PCR). No serological or molecular test has yet been developed that is capable of detecting all existing SRLV groups or subtypes. Results have been most promising when SRLV diversity is characterized and this data used to complement or adapt tests developed to meet current or future needs in each country. Breed stock and registered cattle producers are also advised to participate in government programs for SRLV-free herd certification, while producers with fewer resources are reached through government social programs. An important long-term goal is to certify Mexico’s main goat-producing regions as SRLV-free, and establish a culture among producers of animal health based on timely diagnosis that allows increasing productivity.

Leptospirosis

Leptospirosis is an infectious disease caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Leptospira. It is distributed worldwide in rural and urban areas with specific climatological and orographic characteristics, natural drainage networks, extensive agricultural areas and seasonal rainfall; these conditions favor the spread of Leptospira spp. Infection with Leptospira affects domestic and wild mammals differently, and cases can range from asymptomatic to acute or chronic infection. This microorganism is eliminated in the urine of infected animals continuously or intermittently, thus contaminating the environment. Acute leptospirosis in goats can cause symptoms such as an increase in body temperature, anorexia, depression, jaundice, and anemia. In its chronic form it causes abortions, mummifications, infertility, premature births and neonatal mortality, all resulting in financial losses47. Humans can occasionally host Leptospira spp. When infected they can manifest pathological disorders such as fever, headache, muscle and joint pain, cough, stroke, nausea, vomiting, jaundice, and kidney and liver disorders48.

In Mexico. In a study in the state of Veracruz, an analysis of 873 serum samples identified the most frequent serovars to be Wolffi (45.58 %) and Icterohaemorragiae (45.13 %)49. In the Lagunera region, an analysis of 802 serum samples showed 60.1% to be seropositive for leptospirosis50. In goat herds from the state of Guerrero, 64.26 % of a set of serum samples had antibody titers against at least one Leptospira interrogans serovar51.

Contributions from research at INIFAP

A 2016 study by INIFAP researchers of the serological frequency of antibodies against Leptospira spp. in the main goat-producing region of Guanajuato, found a leptospirosis frequency of 37.90 %52. In 2018, also in Guanajuato, a study evaluated the seroprevalence of Leptospira spp. serovars in goats, their geographic distribution and co-exposure patterns. By analyzing 1,640 samples with the microscopic agglutination test, total prevalence was found to be 45.5 %, that of Icterohaemorrhagiae was 34.16 %, that of Hardjo was 6.77 %, and the remaining serovars represented less than 5%. All the identified serovars exhibited an aggregation pattern that suggests risk areas and transmission vectors. Analysis of antibody co-occurrence showed Icterohaemorrhagiae to be dominant over the other identified serovars53. A 2019 study did a serological diagnosis of the main abortive diseases in goats from Guanajuato using samples from dairy farms with different levels of technology, breeds and management practices; Leptospira spp. seropositivity was confirmed54.

Challenges and outlook in Mexico

Leptospirosis prevention and control measures are needed in herds throughout Mexico. Immunization should be implemented using Leptospira spp. serovars previously identified in goats in an effort to reduce problems caused by the disease, such as abortions, mummifications, premature births and infertility.

Caseous lymphadenitis

Caseous lymphadenitis is a chronic infectious disease affecting goats caused by the Gram-positive bacterium Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, a facultative intracellular pathogen capable of replicating and surviving inside phagocytes. The disease is characterized by presence of suppurative lesions in the lymph nodes, lungs and other internal organs. At a subclinical level the disease manifests in the viscera in the form of abscesses in internal organs (e.g. lungs, liver and mesenteric lymph nodes), and occasionally animals may exhibit chronic pneumonia and progressive weight loss55.

Contributions from research at INIFAP

INIFAP researchers have contributed to development of caseous lymphadenitis diagnostic tests, and genetic characterization of C. pseudotuberculosis strains from sheep, goats and horses56. Another study established a multiple PCR test for diagnosis of caseous lymphadenitis in goats, showing it to be an efficient technique based on clinical samples which can also differentiate between biovars ovis and equi of C. pseudotuberculosis57. An initial study of mutant C. pseudotuberculosis strains as candidates for development of immunogens found that a mutant strain failed to protect Balb/c mice after an experimental challenge, and did not demonstrate adequate humoral or cellular immune responses in this murine model58.

Challenges and outlook in Mexico

Further research is needed to better understand the prevalence and distribution of C. pseudotuberculosis in Mexico. This in turn would contribute to development of an immunogen capable of reducing morbidity in goat production and its consequent financial impacts in Mexico.

Paratuberculosis

Caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis, paratuberculosis is an infection characterized by chronic regional inflammation in the small intestine of ruminants. Its most frequent signs in goats are a decrease in body condition and weight, declining milk production, loss of stool consistency and diarrhea (only in the terminal phase)59. This bacterium has been associated with Crohn’s disease, a chronic disease leading to inflammation and ulceration of the gastrointestinal tract (mainly in the ileum and colon)60, although it is not recognized as the main etiological agent.

In Mexico. Paratuberculosis was first identified in goats in a 1983 study that reported a clear clinical picture of the disease, including intestinal lesions such as enteritis and granulomas in mesenteric lymph nodes, presence of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis in the injured tissues, and antibodies in blood serum61. Various reports have since addressed seroprevalence, isolation and detection of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis genetic material in infected animals in various states in Mexico59,61,62.

Contributions from research at INIFAP

Although paratuberculosis prevalence in goats is variable, research at INIFAP helped establish the risk factors for transmission in Mexico, which include high population density, introduction of infected animals to herds, permanent coexistence with other species, permanence of infected animals and poor hygiene conditions63.

Challenges and prospects in Mexico

Over the short-term, strategies are needed to differentiate the clinical manifestations of paratuberculosis (e.g. low body condition and declining milk production) from other conditions common in herds throughout Mexico, such as poor nutrition from lack of good quality food (especially frequent in areas where community grazing is common). In the medium-term, monitoring of herds in the primary goat-producing areas of Mexico is needed to assess paratuberculosis’ health, productive and financial impacts on a national level. Long-term challenges include substantially reducing paratuberculosis prevalence and incidence, guaranteeing food safety, increasing productivity and thus opening new markets. This will be vital because countries such as the United States and the European Union produce disease-free goats the derivatives of which are consequently more valuable and marketable.

Literatura citada

1. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera [SIAP]. Inventario 2019 caprino. http://www.gob.mx.SIAP. [ Links ]

2. Escareño L, Wurzinger M, Pastor F, Salinas H, Sölkner J, Iñiguez L. The goat and goat production systems of small-scale producers of the Comarca Lagunera in Northern Mexico. Rev Chapingo Ser Cs Forest Amb 2011;12:235-246. [ Links ]

3. SAGARPA. Anuario Estadístico de la Producción Agropecuaria. Región Lagunera Durango-Coahuila. Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. México. 2007. [ Links ]

4. Barrera POT, Sagarnaga VLM, Salas GJM, Leos RJA, Santos LR. Viabilidad económica y financiera de la ganadería caprina extensiva en San Luis Potosí, México. Mundo Agrario 2018;19:40. [ Links ]

5. Blasco JM. Control and eradication strategies for Brucella melitensis infection in sheep and goats. Prilozi 2010;31(1):145-165. [ Links ]

6. Lebre A, Velez J, Seixas D, Rabado E, Oliveira J, Saraiva da Cunha J, Silvestre AM. Brucellar spondylodiscitis: case series of the last 25 years. Acta Med Port 2014;27(2):204-210. [ Links ]

7. Díaz-Aparicio E, Marín C, Alonso B, Aragón V, Pardo M, Blasco JM, Díaz R, Moriyón I. Evaluation of serological tests for diagnosis of Brucella melitensis infection of goats. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:1159-1165. [ Links ]

8. Mancera A, Díaz AE, Vázquez NJ, Velázquez F, Suárez GF, Flores CR. Vacunación de cabras con la cepa Rev 1 de Brucella. melitensis en diferentes dosis: Evaluación serológica y desafío. Vet Méx 1992;2:117-123. [ Links ]

9. Díaz-Aparicio E, Hernández AL, Suárez-Güemes F. Protection against brucellosis in goats, five years after of vaccination with Brucella melitensis Rev 1 vaccine in reduce dose. Trop Anim Health Prod 2004;36:117-121. [ Links ]

10. Díaz AE, Blasco MJM, Suárez GF. Prueba de tarjeta modificada para el diagnóstico de la brucelosis caprina. Vet Méx 1999;30(4):307-311. [ Links ]

11. Díaz-Aparicio E, Marin C, Alonso-Urmeneta B, Aragón V, Pérez-Ortiz S et al. Evaluation of serological tests for diagnosis of Brucella melitensis infection of goats. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:1159-1165. [ Links ]

12. López VIA. Efecto del eritritol en la colonización de Brucella melitensis (Rev1 eryCD) en el tracto reproductor de machos cabríos [tesis maestría]. CDMX: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2020. [ Links ]

13. Essig A, Longbottom D. Chlamydia abortus: New aspects of infectious abortion in sheep and potential risk for pregnant women. Curr Clin Micro 2015; Rpt 2;22-34. [ Links ]

14. Escalante-Ochoa C, Diaz-Aparicio E, Segundo-Zaragoza C, Suarez-Guemes F. Isolation of Chlamydia psittaci involved in abortion of goats in Mexico: first report. Rev Latinoam Microbiol 1997;39:117-121. [ Links ]

15. Mora-Díaz J, Díaz-Aparicio E, Herrera-López E, Suárez-Güemez F, Escalante-Ochoa C, Jaimes-Villareal S, Arellano-Reynoso B. Isolation of Chlamdia abortus; in dairy goat herds and its relation to abortion in Guanajuato, Mexico. Veterinaria México OA 2015;2(1). [ Links ]

16. García LX. Frecuencia de clamidiosis en casos de cabras que presentaron aborto en el estado de Guanajuato [tesis maestría] CDMX: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2019. [ Links ]

17. Romero JA. Diagnóstico de Chlamydia abortus, mediante cultivo celular y PCR de un rebaño caprino con problemas de abortos en Culiacán, Sinaloa [tesina licenciatura] CDMX: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; 2020. [ Links ]

18. Sánchez RL. Presencia de Chlamydia abortus en cabras de México [tesis maestría] México, DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2014. [ Links ]

19. Hernández RP. Presencia de genes de resistencia (tet(C)-tetR(C)) a tetraciclina en aislamientos de Chlamydia abortus [tesis maestría] CDMX: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2020. [ Links ]

20. Santiago BC. Expresion de OmpA recombinante de Chlamydia abortus en Escherichia coli [tesis maestría] CDMX: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2019. [ Links ]

21. García De Jalón CJA. Diarreas en corderos y cabritos. PR 2000;1(1):8-14. [ Links ]

22. Cuellar OJA, Tortora PJ, Trejo GA, Román RP. La producción caprina mexicana, particularidades y complejidades. 1era ed. UNAM, México: Aridana; 2012. [ Links ]

23. Matthew AC, Robyn JL. Recent advances in understanding enteric pathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol 2013;26(4):822-880. [ Links ]

24. Organización Mundial de la Salud [OMS]. E. coli. 2018. [ Links ]

25. Martínez FRI. Identificación de genes de virulencia en aislados de E. coli de origen caprino [tesis maestría] DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2014. [ Links ]

26. Yáñez VA. Determinación de factores de virulencia y clonalidad de cepas de E. coli procedentes de diarrea de cabritos [tesis maestría] DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2016. [ Links ]

27. Limón GMM. Desarrollo y evaluación en campo de una bacterina de E. coli, en caprinos [tesis maestría] México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2017. [ Links ]

28. Rahal A, Ahmad AH, Prakash A, Mandil R, Kumar AT. Environmental attributes to respiratory diseases of small ruminants. Vet Med Int 2014;10. [ Links ]

29. Lamontagne L, Descoteaux JP, Roy R. Epizootiological survey of Parainfluenza-3, Reovirus-3, Respiratory Syncytial and Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis Viral antibodies in sheep and goat flocks in Quebec. Can J Comp Med 1985;49:424-428. [ Links ]

30. Ponnusamy P, Masilamoni BS, Ranjith KM, Manickam R. Isolation, identification and antibiogram of Mannheimia hemolytica associated with caprine pneumonia in the Cauvery Delta Region of Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 2017;6(9): 3118-3122. [ Links ]

30. Blanco VFJ, Trigo TFJ, Jaramillo ML, Aguilar RF, Tapia PG, Suárez GF. Serotipos de Pasteurella multocida y Pasteurella haemolytca aislados a partir de pulmones con lesiones inflamatorias en ovinos y caprinos. Vet Mex 1993;24(2):107-112. [ Links ]

32. Pérez-Romero N, Aguilar-Romero F, Arellano-Reynoso B. Isolation of Histophilus somni from the nasal exudates of a clinically healthy adult goat. Trop Anim Health Prod 2011;43:901-903. [ Links ]

33. Soriano VE, Vega SV, Zamora EJL, Aguilar RF, Negrete AE. Identification of Pasteurella multocida capsular types isolated from rabbits and other domestic animals in Mexico with respiratory diseases. Trop Anim Health Prod 2012;44, 935-937. [ Links ]

34. Martínez RI. Aislamiento, identificación y caracterización de Mannheimia haemolytica y Pasteurella multocida aisladas de caprinos [tesis maestría] México DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2013. [ Links ]

35. Rojas-Fernández M, Vaca S, Reyes-López M, de la Garza M, Aguilar-Romero F, Zenteno E, Soriano VE, Negrete-Abascal E. Outer membrane vesicles of Pasteurella multocida contain virulence factors. Microbiologyopen 2014;3(5):711-717. [ Links ]

36. Hartzell JD, Wood-Morris RN, Martinez LJ, Trotta RF. Q fever: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Clinic Proc 2008;83(5):574-579. [ Links ]

37. ACUERDO mediante el que se da a conocer en los Estados Unidos Mexicanos las enfermedades y plagas exóticas y endémicas de notificación obligatoria de los animales terrestres y acuáticos. DOF publicado el 29/11/2018. [ Links ]

38. Salman MD, Hernández JA, Braun Y. A seroepidemiological study of five bovine diseases in dairy farms of the coastal region of Baja California, Mexico. Prev Vet Med 1990;9(2):143-153. [ Links ]

39. Silva R. Fiebre Q en México. Méd Rev Méx 1950;61(7):493-497. [ Links ]

40. Flores PCF. Identificación de Coxiella burnetii, bacteria exótica en México, mediante PCR, en caprinos y bovinos que presentaron aborto [tesis maestría] CDMX Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2020. [ Links ]

41. Gómez-Lucia E, Barquero N, Domenech A. Maedi-Visna virus: current perspectives. Vet Med 2018;9:11-21. [ Links ]

42. Straub OC. Maedi-Visna virus infection in sheep. History and present knowledge. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2004;27(1):1-5. [ Links ]

43. Blacklaws BA, Berriatua E, Torsteinsdottir S, Watt NJ, de Andres D, Klein D, Harkiss GD. Transmission of small ruminant lentiviruses. Vet Microbiol 2004;101(3):199-208. [ Links ]

44. Nazara SJ, Trigo FJ, Suberbie E, Madrigal V. Estudio serológico de la artritis-encefalitis caprina en México. Tec Pecu Mex 1985;48:96-101. [ Links ]

45. Ramírez H, Glaria I, de Andrés X, Martínez HA, Hernández MM, Reina R, et al. Recombinant small ruminant lentivirus subtype B1 in goats and sheep of imported breeds in Mexico. J Vet 2011;190(1):169-172. [ Links ]

46. Valladares RB. Generación y caracterización de la proteína p25 del Lentivirus de pequeños rumiantes (LvPR), expresada en Escherichia coli [tesis maestría] México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2016. [ Links ]

47. Suwancharoen D, Chaisakdanugull Y, Thanapongtharm W, Yoshida S. Serological survey of leptospirosis in livestock in Thailand. Epidemiol Infect 2013;141(11). [ Links ]

48. Gamage CD, Koizumi N, Perera AK, Muto M, Nwafor-Okoli C, Ranasinghe S, et al. Carrier status of leptospirosis among cattle in Sri Lanka: a zoonotic threat to public health. Transbound Emerg Dis 2014;61(1):91-96. [ Links ]

49. Fernández TAI, Herrera LE, Díaz AE, Barradas PF, Cristóbal CO, Limón GMM. Leptospirosis caprina en diferentes municipios del estado de Veracruz. Congreso Nacional de Buiatria. Acapulco, Guerrero. 2013:694-697. [ Links ]

50. García GN. Estudio Epidemiológico de Leptospirosis Caprina en la Región Lagunera del Estado de Coahuila [tesis licenciatura]. Torreón, Coahuila: Universidad Autónoma Agraria “Antonio Narro”, 2011. [ Links ]

51. López HA. Diagnóstico serológico de Leptospira spp y de C. abortus en las principales zonas de producción caprina del estado de Guerrero, México. [tesis licenciatura] México, DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2011. [ Links ]

52. Flores PP. Diagnóstico serológico de Leptospira interrogans y Brucella melitensis en rebaños caprinos en el estado de Guanajuato [tesis licenciatura] CDMX: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2016. [ Links ]

53. Gaytán CF. Seroprevalencia, distribución geográfica y co-exposición de serovariedades de Leptospira spp. en rebaños caprinos pertenecientes a grupos ganaderos de validación y transferencia de tecnología del estado de Guanajuato [tesis licenciatura] CDMX: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2018. [ Links ]

54. Rueda GY. Seroprevalencia de enfermedades abortivas en cabras de unidades de producción pertenecientes a la región centro-oriente de Guanajuato [tesis especialidad] Querétaro: Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro; 2019. [ Links ]

55. Windsor PA. Control of caseosus lyphadenitis. Vet Clin Food Anim 2011;27:193-202. [ Links ]

56. Parise D, Parise MTD, Viana MVC, Muñoz-Bucio AV, Cortés-Pérez YA, Arellano-Reynoso B, et al. First genome sequencing and comparative analyses of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis strains from Mexico. Standards in Genomic Sci 2018;13:21. [ Links ]

57. Quiroga VDB. Evaluación de una técnica de reacción en cadena de la polimerasa para diagnóstico de linfadenitis caseosa de los pequeños rumiantes. [tesis licenciatura] Cuautitlán Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2019. [ Links ]

58. Ibarra ZC, Arellano RB, Hernández CR, Palomares REG, Díaz AE. Evaluation of the aroA mutant of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis in cellular and murine models. Vet Méx 2016;3:4:1-16. [ Links ]

59. Velázquez MJ, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratuberculosis in reproductive tissue and semen of naturally infected rams. Animal Rep 2019;( 4):930-937. [ Links ]

60. Yamamoto FJK. Crohn´s disease: diagnosis and treatment. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2013;78(Supl 1): 68-70. [ Links ]

61. Ramírez PC, Ramírez CIC, Valero EG, Trigo TE. Paratuberculosis en cabras en México. Tec Pecu Mex 1983;45:104-106. [ Links ]

62. Gallaga MEP, Arellano RB, Santillán FMA, Favila HLC, Córdova LD, Morales JR, Díaz AE, Situación epidemiológica de la paratuberculosis en las principales regiones caprinas del estado de Puebla, México. Quehacer Científico en Chiapas 2017;12(1). [ Links ]

63. Ruiz CCG, Flores MAS, López DC. Prevalence and possible risk factors for caprine paratuberculosis in intensive dairy production units in Guanajuato, Mexico. J VetMed Anim Health 2016;8(11):156-162. [ Links ]

Received: September 14, 2020; Accepted: February 16, 2021

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons