SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número59La conceptualización de los intelectuales en el pensamiento de Max Weber¿Es el mundo moderno una monolítica jaula de hierro? Aprovechando a Max Weber para caracterizar la actual dinámica interna de la cultura política norteamericana índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Sociológica (México)

versão On-line ISSN 2007-8358versão impressa ISSN 0187-0173

Sociológica (Méx.) vol.20 no.59 Ciudad de México Set./Dez. 2005

 

Artículos de investigación

Cien años de debate en torno a la tesis weberiana sobre la ética protestante

Francisco Gil Villegas M. *  

* Profesor de El Colegio de México, México. Correo electrónico: fgilvillegas2002@yahoo.com.mx.


RESUMEN

Adelanto de una más amplia investigación, este artículo ofrece como muestra algunas malas lecturas a las que se prestó la tesis weberiana sobre la ética protestante durante la década de los sesenta, cuando se intentó extrapolarla a casos no contemplados por el propio Weber o que caían fuera de los parámetros espacio-temporales expresamente fijados por él para juzgar la validez de su tesis. Con los ejemplos seleccionados se demuestra lo fructífero de la tesis weberiana como fuente de inspiración para nuevas investigaciones, pero también la irrelevancia de éstas para confirmar o refutar la validez intrínseca de la tesis misma.

Palabras clave: Afinidades electivas; causalidad; tipo ideal; modernización; sociedad adquisitiva; protestantismo; capitalismo

ABSTRACT

Advancing materials from a broader research project, this article offers a sam-ple of some erroneous readings of Weber’s thesis about the Protestant ethic produced during the 1960s when an attempt was made to extrapolate it to cases not dealt with by Weber himself or that fell outside of the time-space parameters that he expressly established for judging his hypothesis’s validity. The examples selected show how fruitful Weber’s hypothesis is as a source of inspiration for new research, but also how irrelevant the latter is for confirming or refuting the intrinsic validity of the hypothesis itself.

Key words: elective affinities; causality; ideal type; modernization; acquisi-tive society; Protestantism; capitalism

Texto completo disponible sólo en PDF.

BIBLIOGRAFÍA

Babbie, Earl R. 1965 “The Religious Factor Looking Forward”, Review of Religious Research, vol. 7, pp. 42-51. [ Links ]

Barclay, Harold B. 1969 “The Protestant Ethic Versus the Spirit of Capitalism?”, Review of Religious Research, vol. 10, pp. 151-158. [ Links ]

Barnes, Harry Elmer (comp.) 1948 An Introduction to the History of Sociology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. [ Links ]

Bellah, Robert N. 1963 “Reflections on the Protestant Ethic Analogy in Asia”, Journal of Social Issues, vol. XIX, núm. 1, enero, pp. 52-60, reimpreso en Eisenstadt, 1968b: 243-251. [ Links ]

Berlin, Isaiah 1979 Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford University Press, Oxford. [ Links ]

Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. 1968a “The Protestant Ethic Thesis in an Analytical and Comparative Framework”, en Eisenstadt, 1968b, pp. 3-45. [ Links ]

Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (comp.) 1968b The Protestant Ethic and Modernization. A Comparative View, Basic Books, Nueva York. [ Links ]

Forcese, Dennis P. 1968 “Calvinism, Capitalism and Confusion: The Weberian Thesis Revisited”, Sociological Analysis, vol. 29, pp. 193-201. [ Links ]

Gil Villegas, Francisco 2003 “Introducción del editor” a Max Weber, La ética protestante y el espíritu del capitalismo, edición crítica y comentada de Francisco Gil Villegas, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México D. F. [ Links ]

Goldstein, Bernice y Robert L. Eichorn 1961 “The Changing Protestant Ethic: Rural Patterns in Health, Work and Leisure”, American Sociological Review, vol. 26, pp.557-565. [ Links ]

Greeley, Andrew M. 1964 “The Protestant Ethic: Time for a Moratorium”, Sociological Analysis, vol. 25, pp. 20-33. [ Links ]

Hansen, Niles M. 1967 “Early Flemish Capitalism. The Medieval City, the Protestant Ethic and the Emergence of Economic Rationality”, Social Research, vol. 34, núm. 2, verano, pp. 226-248. [ Links ]

Hertz, Karl H. 1962 “Max Weber and American Puritanism”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol. 1, pp. 189-197. [ Links ]

Johnson, Benton 1971 “Max Weber and American Protestantism”, Sociological Quarterly, vol. 12, pp. 473-485. [ Links ]

______ 1962 “Ascetic Protestantism and Political Preference”, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 26, núm. 1, pp. 35-46. [ Links ]

______ 1961 “Do Holiness Sects Socialize in Dominant Values?”, Social Forces, vol. 39, pp. 309-316. [ Links ]

Kennedy, Robert E. 1962 “The Protestant Ethic and the Parsis”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 68, núm. 4, pp. 11-20. [ Links ]

Kosa, John y Leo D. Rachiele 1963 “The Spirit of Capitalism. Traditionalism and Religiousness: A Re-Examination of Weber’s Concepts”, Sociological Quarterly, vol. 4, pp. 243-260. [ Links ]

Lensky, Gerhard 1965 “Response to Babbie”, Review of Religious Research, vol. 7, pp. 51-53. [ Links ]

______ 1963 The Religious Factor: A Sociological Study of Religion’s Impact on Politics, Economics, and Family Life, Double Day, Nueva York. [ Links ]

Marshall, Gordon 1980 Presbyteries and Profits: Calvinism and the Development of Capitalism in Scotland, 1560-1707, Clarendon Press, Oxford. [ Links ]

Mayer, Albert J. y Harry Sharp 1962 “Religious Preference and Wordly Success”, American Sociological Review, vol. 27, pp. 218-227. [ Links ]

McClelland, David C. 1961 The Achieving Society, Van Nostrand, Princeton. [ Links ]

Means, Richard L. 1966 “Protestantism and Economic Institutions: Auxiliary Theories to Weber’s Protestant Ethic”, Social Forces, vol. 44, núm. 3, marzo, pp. 372-381. [ Links ]

______ 1965 “Weber’s Thesis of the Protestant Ethic: The Ambiguities of Recieved Doctrine”, The Journal of Religion, vol. XLV, núm. 1, enero, pp. 1-11. [ Links ]

______ 1964 Protestantism in American Sociology, 1930-1960. A Study in the Relations between Theory, Research, and Historical Sociology, disertación doctoral inédita presentada en la Universidad de Cornell en febrero de 1964 (versión en microfilm). [ Links ]

Nafziger, Estel Wayne 1965 “The Menonite Ethic in the Weberian Framework”, en Explorations in Enterpreneurial History, vol. II, núm. 3, pp.187-204. [ Links ]

Nelson, Benjamin 1969 “Conscience and the Making of Early Modern Cultures. The Protestant Ethic Beyond Max Weber”, Social Research, vol. 36, núm. 1, pp. 4-21. [ Links ]

Parenti, Michael 1967 “Political Values and Religious Cultures: Jews, Catholics and Protestants”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol. 6, pp. 259-269. [ Links ]

Sombart, Werner 1906 Die Juden und das Wirtschatsleben [Los judíos y la vida económica], Duncker & Humblot, s.1. [ Links ]

Sprinzak, Ehud 1972 “Weber’s Thesis as An Historical Explanation”, History and Theory, vol. 11, núm. 3, pp. 294-320. [ Links ]

Stark, Werner 1966 “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Sociology”, Social Compass, vol. 13, pp. 373-377. [ Links ]

Tawney, Richard H. 1938 “Preface”, en Religion and the Rise of Capitalism, Pengiun Books, Harmondsworth, pp. VII-XIV. [ Links ]

Trevor-Roper, Hugh 1967 “Religion, the Reformation and Social Change”, en Hugh Trevor-Roper, The Crisis of the Seventeenth Century and Other Essays, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, pp. 1-42. [ Links ]

Troeltsch, Ernst 1951 El protestantismo y el mundo moderno, primera edición de 1911, trad. Eugenio Ímaz, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México D. F. [ Links ]

Wagner, Helmut 1964 “The Protestant Ethic: A Mid-Twentieth Century View”, Sociological Analysis, vol. 25, pp. 34-40. [ Links ]

Weber, Max 2003 La ética protestante y el espíritu del capitalismo, edición crítica y comentada de Francisco Gil Villegas, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México D. F. [ Links ]

Recibido: 04 de Octubre de 2004; Aprobado: 30 de Marzo de 2005

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons