SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9Effect of the administration route of gonadotropin releasing hormone on the reproductive performance of multiparous Holstein cowsAdding equine chorionic gonadotropin to the G6G protocol improves pregnancy rate of dairy cows under heat stress conditions índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Veterinaria México OA

versión On-line ISSN 2448-6760

Veterinaria México OA vol.9  Ciudad de México  2022  Epub 29-Mayo-2023

https://doi.org/10.22201/fmvz.24486760el2022.1056 

Original research articles

Fertility in dairy cows treated in the early luteal phase with a reused progesterone-releasing intravaginal device

Graciela Meneses Arias1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7902-5109

Fernando Rivera Acuña2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6475-2445

Hugo Horacio Montaldo1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5773-8784

Martha Ramírez López1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3129-6150

Joel Hernández Cerón1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3892-9427

1 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Ciudad de México, México

2 Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora. Departamento de Ciencias Agronómicas y Veterinarias, Av. 5 de Febrero 818 Sur, Col. Centro. CP 85000 Cd. Obregón, Sonora, México.


Abstract

In this study, we tested whether early luteal phase treatment with a previously used progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (DIV) increased conception rate (CR) in dairy cows. Two experiments were performed; in the first, progesterone concentrations were determined in cows treated with a reused DIV. Seven cows received PGF2α and a reused DIV was inserted for seven days. Blood samples were collected daily for progesterone determination. Progesterone increased from 0.42 ± 0.17 ng/mL (mean ± standard deviation) at DIV insertion to 1.99 ± 0.52 ng/mL at 24 h and 2.11 ± 0.40 ng/mL at 48 h after; during the treatment period, progesterone showed an average concentration of 1.4 ± 0.55 ng/mL. In the second experiment, 383 cows were randomly divided on day 4 post-insemination, into two treatment groups: DIV (n = 188), received a reused DIV, which was removed on day 14; Control (n = 195), did not receive DIV. Progesterone concentrations were determined in seven cows from each group. The CR was not affected by treatment [DIV (33.5 %) vs. Control (37.4 %); P > 0.05]. No interaction was observed between treatment and service number, parity, the type of postpartum (normal or pathological), body condition, or days in milk (P > 0.05). Progesterone concentrations were similar between treatments (P > 0.05). We conclude that the insertion of a reused DIV at early diestrus did not increase serum progesterone concentrations or conception rate in dairy cows.

Keywords: progesterone; intravaginal progesterone-releasing device; dairy cows; fertility

Resumen

Probamos si el tratamiento en la fase lútea temprana con un dispositivo intravaginal liberador de progesterona (DIV) reutilizado incrementa el porcentaje de concepción (PC) en vacas lecheras. Se realizaron dos experimentos; en el primero, se determinaron las concentraciones de progesterona en vacas tratadas con un DIV reutilizado. Siete vacas recibieron PGF2α y se insertó durante siete días un DIV reutilizado. Se determinaron diariamente las concentraciones de progesterona, las cuales se incrementaron de 0.42 ± 0.17 ng/mL (media ± desviación estándar) al momento de la inserción del DIV a 1.99 ± 0.52 ng/mL a las 24 h y a 2.11 ± 0.40 ng/mL a las 48 h; la concentración promedio fue de 1.4 ± 0.55 ng/mL. En el segundo experimento, 383 vacas se asignaron el día cuatro posinseminación a dos tratamientos: DIV (n = 188), recibieron un DIV reutilizado, el cual se retiró el día 14; Testigo (n = 195), no recibieron dispositivo. Se determinaron las concentraciones de progesterona en siete vacas de cada grupo. El PC no fue afectado por el tratamiento [DIV (33.5 %) vs Testigo (37.4 %); P > 0.05]. No se observó interacción del tratamiento con el número de servicio, número de parto, tipo de puerperio (normal o patológico), condición corporal o días en leche (P > 0.05). Las concentraciones de progesterona fueron similares entre los tratamientos (P > 0.05). Se concluye que la inserción de un DIV reutilizado en la fase lútea temprana no aumenta las concentraciones de progesterona ni incrementa el PC en vacas lecheras.

Palabras clave: progesterona; dispositivo intravaginal; fertilidad; vacas lecheras

Study contribution

High-production dairy cows require a high intake of dry matter, which increases the hepatic catabolism of progesterone, a condition associated with low fertility. Various strategies to increase fertility by administering progesterone have been evaluated with varying results. In one study, discrete increases in progesterone concentrations during the early luteal phase with reused progesterone-releasing intravaginal device-increased fertility. However, no other work has corroborated these results. In this study, we tested whether the insertion of a reused progesterone-releasing intravaginal device in the early luteal phase increased fertility. Three hundred eighty-three cows were used; on day four post-insemination, 188 cows received a reused device, while 195 cows received no device. The results did not show an increase in fertility in cows receiving a reused device.

Introduction

Abnormalities of embryonic development and subsequent embryo death are the leading cause of reproductive failure in dairy cows.1 Such abnormalities may be a consequence of the low serum concentrations of progesterone suffered by dairy cows in intensive production systems, which is because the corpus luteum produces less progesterone and steroid hormones are catabolized more rapidly.2-5

A common approach to the clinical management of infertility in dairy cows has consisted of the administration of progesterone using an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (DIV); however, the results have been variable. While in some studies, the administration of progesterone increases the ratio of pregnant cows to total inseminated cows (conception rate or P/AI), in others, no effect has been observed.6-9

The physiological window in which progesterone is administered has influenced the response. Mann et al. observed that progesterone supplementation between days five and nine post-insemination favors embryo development, whereas the same treatment between days 12 and 16 has no effect.10 Progesterone concentrations are also critical for embryo survival between days four and nine after estrus.11, 12 Stronge et al. also found a positive association between progesterone concentrations between days five and seven of the estrus cycle and embryo survival.13

Larson et al. proposed that a discrete increase in serum progesterone levels during the early luteal phase could improve the conception rate.14 In their study, the insertion of a previously used controlled internal drug-release device (CIDR) from day 3.5 to day 10 post-insemination increased progesterone concentrations and conception rates. The increase in serum progesterone concentrations in this experiment was only 0.7 ng/mL on the day after CIDR placement.

The authors suggest that the increase in the conception rate is due to this modest increase in the concentration of progesterone, since a greater increase such as that caused by the usage of a new DIV could have a negative effect on corpus luteum lifespan. These results could justify the use of recycled DIV to increase fertility in dairy cows; however, there is no other work in which the same treatment has been evaluated. Therefore, this study tested whether the insertion of a reused DIV in the early luteal phase increased the conception rate in dairy cows.

Materials and methods

Statement of ethics

This work did not require the approval of the Institutional Committee for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals (SICUAE) of the National Autonomous University of Mexico School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry. The practices to which the cows were subjected during the study such as intravaginal insertion of a device, an injection of PGF2α, blood sampling, and transrectal pregnancy diagnosis are routine in commercial herds.

Animals

The study was performed in a commercial dairy herd located in Tizayuca, Hgo. The climate of the region is temperate subhumid, with an average annual temperature of 15.5°C and an average annual rainfall of 861 mm. The cows were housed in free-stall pens and fed a total mixed ration. Milk production fluctuated between 7 000 and 8 000 kg per lactation (305 days). Cows were identified in estrus by observing standing behavior and were inseminated by two technicians under the am-pm/pm-am program. In all cases, the presence of uterine tone and cervical mucus was determined, as well as the external signs of estrus. The pregnancy diagnosis was made by transrectal palpation between days 45 and 50 post-insemination.

Experiment 1

This experiment determined serum progesterone concentrations obtained with a reused DIV (PRID Delta; Ceva Animal Health) in dairy cows. To this end, seven cycling cows 50 to 80-day postpartum were used. The devices, which had already been used for six days in other cows, were washed with running water and sterilized with gamma irradiation. Before the insertion of the DIV, the cows received two injections of PGF2α (Celosil; MSD Animal Health) intramuscularly with a 14 day interval; 24 h after the second injection of PGF2α, the cows received another injection of PGF2α and the DIV was inserted, remaining in situ seven days.

Starting from the day of insertion, blood samples were collected daily for seven days. Samples were obtained by venipuncture in vacuum tubes without anticoagulant and centrifuged at 1 500 g for ten minutes for separating the serum, which was stored at -20°C. Addition, from the time the device was inserted, an estrus detection patch (Estrotect®) was placed on all cows. Following the removal of the device, estruses were detected twice a day in two-hour periods (morning and afternoon).

Experiment 2

Based on the results of Experiment 1, Experiment 2 determined the effect of insertion of the reused DIV in the early luteal phase on the conception rate in dairy cows. Three hundred eighty-three Holstein cows of one to three services 120 ± 3.2-day postpartum was used, with 3.1 ± 0.09 births and a body condition score of ≥ 2. On day four post-insemination, the cows were randomly divided into two treatment groups: DIV (n = 188), which received a reused DIV removed on day 14 post-insemination, and Control (n = 195), in which cows did not receive DIV treatment. Blood samples were collected daily during the treatment days in seven cows from the reused DIV group and six from the control group. Samples were obtained by venipuncture in vacuum tubes without anticoagulant and centrifuged at 1 500 g for ten minutes for separating the serum, which was stored at -20°C.

Determination of progesterone concentrations

Progesterone concentrations were determined by solid-phase radioimmunoassay (Coat-A-Count Progesterone Diagnostic Product Corporation, USA), with a sensitivity of 0.1 ng/mL and an intra-assay coefficient of variation of 6.4 percent.

Statistical analysis

A logistic regression analysis was performed for binary variables to determine the significance of the categorical explanatory effects of the treatment, the number of services, parity (primiparous vs multiparous), type of postpartum [normal vs pathological (cows that suffered placental retention and/or purulent vaginal discharge)], body condition score, and days in milk on the conception rate. Progesterone data were analyzed with a mixed linear statistical model using days, days2, treatment, interaction effects days x treatment and days2 x treatment as fixed effects. The random cow effect was included to model the repeated structure of the measurements; a residual effect was also included.15

Results and discussion

The serum progesterone concentrations of Experiment 1 are shown in Figure 1. Progesterone concentrations increased from 0.42 ± 0.17 at the time of insertion of the DIV, to 1.99 ± 0.52 ng/mL at 24 h and 2.11 ± 0.40 ng/mL at 48 h later. During the treatment period, serum progesterone showed an average concentration of 1.4 ± 0.55 ng/mL.

Figure 1 Progesterone concentrations (mean + standard deviation) in cows treated with a reused DIV (PRID Delta). Day 1 corresponds to the day of insertion of the DIV. 

During the treatment period with the reused DIV, no cows showed estrus. All cows presented estrus following removal of the DIV. The insertion of the reused DIV increased serum progesterone concentrations sufficiently to suppress the presentation of estrus and to cause, following its removal, the presentation of a fertile estrus.

The best model for this type of study is that of the ovariectomized cow.16 However, in other studies designed to determine the progesterone released by an DIV, an animal model without ovariectomy was used, in which after inducing luteolysis with two injections of PGF2α within a 24-hour period, a norgestomet ear implant was placed for two days to prevent ovulation before inserting the DIV.17, 18 In this study, the fact that the cows that received the reused DIV did not show estrus during the treatment period and presented synchronized estrus after removing the DIV, allows us to propose that the source of serum progesterone was only from the reused DIV.

Van Cleef et al. used new and reused DIV for nine days (CIDR, 1.9-g progesterone) in ovariectomized dairy cows.19 As expected, the new CIDRs obtained higher plasma progesterone concentrations than the reused CIDRs; in addition, the progesterone concentrations with the reused CIDRs were greater than 1 ng/mL (mean of 1.5 ± 0.14 ng/mL), which is consistent with the concentrations obtained in this study. Moreover, the progesterone profile obtained is similar to the profiles observed with the use of recycled CIDRs.17, 19

To our knowledge, no study has been published showing the progesterone profile generated with the use of a reused PRID Delta in dairy cows, a situation that determined the performance of the first experiment. The reuse of DIVs is not recommended by manufacturers; however, reused DIVs are used in synchronization programs with satisfactory results. Additionally, thermal treatment for sterilization of reused DIVs (CIDRs) facilitates the release of progesterone, which is reflected in plasma progesterone concentrations similar to those observed when new DIVs are used.17

The favorable effect of high progesterone concentrations on embryonic development has been demonstrated in different scenarios;9, 20 however, the effect of administering an external source of progesterone in fertility is contradictory.6-9 The results of the logistic regression analysis (Table 1) show that treatment with a reused DIV did not increase the odds ratio of pregnancy; nor was any treatment interaction observed with the variables included in the analysis. Based on the hypothesis raised in this study, it was expected that the insertion of a reused DIV would cause a discrete increase in progesterone concentrations during the early luteal phase (day four post-insemination), which would increase the conception rate; however, progesterone was not increased or fertility affected.

Table 1 Odds ratio of gestation according to variables in the logistic regression model 

Variables Classes Number of cows Conception rate Odds ratio CI 95 % P
Group DIV 188 33 Reference
Control 195 37 1.05 0.6-1.6 0.08
Days in milk* ≤100 187 35 Reference
101-200 145 36 1.37 0.4-1.3 0.29
>200 45 35 1.15 0.3-2.1 0.77
Parity Primiparous 101 35 Reference
Multiparous 282 36 1.2 0.4-1.4 0.52
Body condition score <2.5 15 27 Reference
2.5-3 274 37 1.91 0.9-4.0 0.07
>3 94 31 1.41 0.5-3.5 0.45
Number of services First 203 31 Reference
Second 120 42 2.06 1.1-3.7 0.01
Third 60 37 2.24 1.0-5.0 0.04
Postpartum Pathological 196 32 Reference
Normal 187 39 1.68 1.0-2.7 0.03

*For days in milk, the total number of cows is lower because some cows did not have this information in the records.

Figure 2 shows the serum progesterone concentrations of Experiment 2, which were similar between those of cows that had a reused DIV and the control group (P > 0.05). The results of this study contrast with those obtained by Larson et al., who observed that the insertion of a reused DIV (CIDR) at day 3.5 post-insemination increased (P < 0.05) the serum concentration of progesterone by 0.7 ng/mL, which is associated with a favorable effect on fertility.14

Figure 2 The evolution of predicted (Pred) values of mean serum progesterone concentration in cows treated with a reused DIV (R; red lines) and control (T; black lines) and lower (L95) and upper (H95) 95% confidence limits, by second-degree polynomial regression, between days 4 and 14 after insemination. Mean progesterone concentrations were similar between treatments (P > 0.05); however, the treatment x day interaction indicates a lack of parallelism between curves (P < 0.05). 

The reason a significant increase was not observed in serum progesterone concentrations in cows receiving an additional source of this hormone is unknown. One factor that may have influenced this finding is the amount of progesterone contained in the different devices. The new device used in the Larson et al. study had 1.9 g progesterone while the new PRID Delta contains 1.55 g;14 thus, it is possible that after one use, the progesterone content was lower in the PRID Delta than in the CIDR.

However, in this study, the progesterone released by the reused PRID Delta was similar to that observed in studies performed with reused CIDRs.17, 19 Alternatively, milk production, and in particular dry matter intake, determine the hepatic clearance rate of steroid hormones. Thus, high-producing cows have lower serum progesterone concentrations than cows that produce less milk or are not in lactation.3, 4 The cows used in this study have moderate production (7 000 to 8 000 kg of milk/305 days; therefore, it was expected that the administration of exogenous progesterone would be reflected in higher serum levels of this hormone, which did not occur.

It is likely that the variability of fertility outcomes reported in the different published studies when progesterone is administered is highly dependent on differences in management, dry matter intake, changes in body condition score, milk production, nutrition, uterine health, and climate, among other factors.9, 21 Additionally, the source of progesterone used has been DIVs, which are effective for estrus synchronization, i.e., they work efficiently for the purposes for which they were developed. It is necessary to have an exogenous source of progesterone that generates blood concentrations replacing the progesterone eliminated by hepatic metabolism, a condition that tends to worsen due to the sustained increase in milk production observed in modern dairy cows.

It is worth noting that a strategy in which more consistent results to increase progesterone blood concentrations have been observed involves inducting a second corpus luteum with the injection of hCG on day five post-insemination; in several studies, this treatment has increased conception rate in dairy cows.22-24

Conclusions

The insertion of a reused progesterone-releasing intravaginal device in the early luteal phase did not increase serum progesterone concentrations or improve the conception rate in dairy cows.

Data availability

The data generated and analyzed in this work will be made available upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of interest

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: G Meneses, J Hernández, F Rivera.

Data management: G Meneses, M Ramírez.

Data analysis: HH Montaldo, J Hernandez.

Research: G Meneses, M Ramírez.

Writing of the original draft: J Hernandez, H. H. Montaldo, F. Rivera.

Revision, editing and approval of the final version of the manuscript: J Hernandez, G Meneses, F Rivera, H Montaldo, M Ramirez.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the support of the farmers of the Dairy Region in Tizayuca, Hidalgo, as well as the collaboration of Clara Murcia Mejía, in the determination of progesterone concentrations.

References

1. Diskin MG, Parr MH, Morris DG. Embryo death in cattle: an update. Reproduction Fertility and Development. 2011;24:244-251. doi: 10.1071/RD11914. [ Links ]

2. Villa-Godoy A, Hughes TL, Emery RS, Chapin LT, Fogwell RL. Association between energy balance and luteal function in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 1988;71:1063-1072. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79653-8. [ Links ]

3. Sangsritavong S, Combs DK, Sartori R, Armentano LE, Wiltbank MC. High feed intake increase liver blood flow and metabolism of progesterone and estradiol-17b in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science . 2002;85:2831-2842. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74370-1. [ Links ]

4. Vasconcelos JL, Sangsritavong S, Tsai SJ, Wiltbank MC. Acute reduction in serum progesterone concentrations after feed intake in dairy cows. Theriogenology. 2003;60:795-807. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00102-X. [ Links ]

5. Lonergan P, Sánchez JM. Symposium review: Progesterone effects on early embryo development in cattle. Journal of Dairy Science . 2020;103:8698-8707. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18583. [ Links ]

6. Van Cleeff J, Drost M, Thatcher WW. Effect of post insemination progesterone supplementation on fertility and subsecuent estrous response of dairy heifers. Theriogenology . 1991;36:795-807. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(91)90345-E. [ Links ]

7. Macmillan KL, Peterson AJ. A new intravaginal progesterone-releasing device for cattle (CIDR-B) for oestrous synchronization, increasing pregnancy rates and the treatment of post-partum anoestrus. Animal Reproduction Science. 1993;33:1-26. doi: 10.1016/0378-4320(93)90104-Y. [ Links ]

8. Villarroel A, Martino A, BonDurant RH, Deletang F, Sischo WM. Effect of post-insemination supplementation with PRID on pregnancy in repeat-breeder Holstein cows. Theriogenology . 2004;61:1513-1520. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.09.001. [ Links ]

9. Wiltbank MC, Souza AH, Carvalho PD, Cunha AP, Giordano JO, Fricke PM, Baez GM, Diskin MG. Physiological and practical effects of progesterone on reproduction in dairy cattle. Animal. 2014;8(Suppl 1):70-81. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114000585. [ Links ]

10. Mann GE, Fray MD, Lamming GE. Effects of time of progesterone supplementation on embryo development and interferon-τ production in cow. The Veterinary Journal. 2006;171:500-503. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.12.005. [ Links ]

11. Inskeep EK. Preovulatory, postovulatory, and postmaternal recognition effects of concentrations of progesterone on embryonic survival in the cow. Journal of Animal Science. 2004;82 (E Suppl.): E24-E39. doi: 10.2527/2004.8213_supplE24x. [ Links ]

12. Parr MH, Crowe MA, Lonergan P, Evans ACO, Rizos D, Diskin MG. Effect of exogenous progesterone supplementation in the early luteal phase post-insemination on pregnancy per artificial insemination in Holstein-Friesian cows. Animal Reproduction Science . 2014;150:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.08.008. [ Links ]

13. Stronge AJ, Sreenan JM, Diskin MG, Mee JF, Kenny DA, Morris DG. Post-insemination milk progesterone concentration and embryo survival in dairy cows. Theriogenology . 2005;64:1212-1224. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.02.007. [ Links ]

14. Larson SF, Butler WR, Currie WB. Pregnancy rates in lactating dairy cattle following supplementation of progesterone after artificial insemination. Animal Reproduction Science . 2007;102:172-179. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.02.023. [ Links ]

15. Payne RW. GenStat. WIREs Computational Statistics. 2009;1:255-258. doi: 10.1002/wics.32. [ Links ]

16. Van Werven T, Waldeck F, Souza AH, Floch S, Englebienn M. Comparision of two intravaginal progesterone releasing decives (PRID-DELTA vs CIDR) in dairy cows: Blood progesterone profile and field fertility. Animal Reproduction Science . 2013;138:143-149. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.02.010. [ Links ]

17. Melo LF, Monteiro Jr PLJ, Oliveira LH, Guardieiro MM, Drum JN, Wiltbank MC, et al. Circulating progesterone concentrations in nonlactating Holstein cows during reuse of intravaginal progesterone implants sanitized by autoclave or chemical disinfection. Journal of Dairy Science . 2018;101:3537-3544. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13569. [ Links ]

18. Oliveira e Silva LOE, Valenza A, Alves RLOR, Silva MAD, Silva TJBD, Motta JCL, et al. Progesterone release profile and follicular development in Holstein cows receiving intravaginal progesterone devices. Theriogenology . 2021;172:207-215. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.07.001. [ Links ]

19. Van Cleeff J, Lucy MC, Wilcox CJ, Thatcher WW. Plasma and milk progesterone and plasma LH in ovariectomized lactating cows treated with new or used controlled internal drug release devices. Animal Reproduction Science . 1992;27:91-106. doi: 10.1016/0378-4320(92)90049-J. [ Links ]

20. Martins T, Sponchiado M, Silva FACC, Estrada-Cortés E, Hansen PJ, Peñagaricano F, et al. Progesterone-dependent and -independent modulation of luminal epithelial transcription to support pregnancy in cattle. Physiological Genomics. 2022;25:71-85. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00108.2021. [ Links ]

21. Friedman E, Roth Z, Voet H, Lavon Y, Wolfenson D. Progesterone supplementation postinsemination improves fertility of cooled dairy cows during the summer. Journal of Dairy Science . 2012;95:3092-3099. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5017. [ Links ]

22. Santos JEP, Thatcher WW, Pool L, Overton MW. Effect of human chorionic gonadotropin on luteal function and reproductive performance of high-producing lactating Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science . 2001;79:2881-2894. doi: 10.2527/2001.79112881x. [ Links ]

23. Nascimento AB, Bender RW, Souza AH, Ayres H, Araujo RR, Guenther JN, et al. Effect of treatment with human chorionic gonadotropin on day 5 after timed artificial insemination on fertility of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science . 2013;96:2873-2882. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5895. [ Links ]

24. Urzúa E, Valdés LA, Garza A, Mapes G, Gutiérrez C, Hernández-Cerón J. Pregnancy rate in dairy cows treated with human chorionic gonadotropin five days after insemination. Austral Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2017;49:119-122. doi: 10.4067/S0719-81322017000200119. [ Links ]

Cite this as: Meneses Arias G, Rivera Acuña F, Montaldo HH, Ramírez López M, Hernández-Cerón J. Fertility in dairy cows treated in the early luteal phase with a reused progesterone-releasing intravaginal device. Veterinaria México OA. 2022;9. doi: 10.22201/fmvz.24486760e.2022.1056.

Received: March 03, 2022; Accepted: May 19, 2022; Published: September 08, 2022

* Corresponding author: Joel Hernández Cerón. Email address: jhc@unam.mx

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License