Resumen

TAJER, Diego. Logical pluralism, correctness and Carnapian tolerance. Andamios [online]. 2023, vol.20, n.53, pp.25-44.  Epub 05-Abr-2024. ISSN 2594-1917.  https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v20i53.1029.

The concept of “logical pluralism” is usually understood as the idea that there are two or more correct logics. But in some areas of logical practice, such as the solution of semantic paradoxes, the notion of correctness does not play such a fundamental role. In this paper I describe a different version of logical pluralism, which can be more adequately applied to these problematic disputes. According to this approach, logic (as a science) establishes the rules for accepting logical theories, while logicians can contribute by offering new, original, and technically solid approaches. This can be seen as a Carnapian pluralism, where everyone is free to build their own logic, as far as it follows some methodological rules.

Palabras llave : Logical pluralism; validity; correctness; non-classical Logics; semantic paradoxes.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )