SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número1Voto étnico en Bolivia. Cohesión, disgregación y clivajes étnicos¿Cuarto poder? Mercados, audiencias y contenidos en la prensa estatal mexicana índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Política y gobierno

versión impresa ISSN 1665-2037

Resumen

DONOSO, Alfonso. Immigration and Punishment. Against the Laws of Penal Inadmissibility. Polít. gob [online]. 2018, vol.25, n.1, pp.101-123. ISSN 1665-2037.

Are laws that forbid the entrance of foreigners in a state on grounds of their criminal record morally justifiable? Taking as a starting point Cecile Fabre’s arguments (2016) against Joseph Caren’s use of these laws or criteria of inadmissibility (2013), I consider a series of plausible arguments against these criteria to ultimately reject each of them. Instead, I offer a different and substantive normative critique against this criterion of penal inadmissibility based on the principle of equality, pivotal to any plausible political theory and, thus, central to an adequate conception of punishment within the political community. Ultimately, I deem penal inadmissibility unjustifiable within a political community that aspires to respect each individual’s equal moral status.

Palabras llave : punishment; ethics of immigration; laws of inadmissibility.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )