SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.66 número2The Frenet-Serret description of Born rigidity and its application to the Dirac equationExact solutions of vector bosons in the presence of the Aharonov-Bohm and Coulomb potentials in the gravitational field of topological defects in non-commutative space-time índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de física

versión impresa ISSN 0035-001X

Rev. mex. fis. vol.66 no.2 México mar./abr. 2020  Epub 26-Mar-2021

https://doi.org/10.31349/revmexfis.66.187 

Research

Gravitation, Mathematical Physics and Field Theory

Analysis of fractional Duffing oscillator

S.C. Ezea 

aDepartment of Mathematics, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria, e-mail: sundaychristianeze@gmail.com Tel: +2347032354775.


Abstract

In this contribution, a simple analytical method (which is an elegant combination of well known methods; perturbation and Laplace methods) for solving non-linear and non-homogeneous fractional differential equations is proposed. In particular, the proposed method was used to analyze the fractional Duffing oscillator. The technique employed can be used to analyze other non-linear fractional differential equations and can also be extended to non-linear partial fractional differential equations. The performance of this method is reliable, effective, and gives more general solutions.

Keywords: Fractional calculus; fractional Duffing oscillator; analytical method

PACS: 02.30.Jr; 02.30.Vv; 41.20.Cv; 45.10.Hj

1. Introduction

The subject of fractional calculus has a long history dating back to the time when the derivative of order 1/2 was described by Leibniz to L’ Hopital in 1695 [1]. In recent years, fractional calculus has found its way in many areas of applied sciences and engineering, and it has been demonstrated that modeling physical systems using fractional calculus is more accurate than using integer calculus. This is because the behaviour of many physical phenomena depends on the previous time history (see Mohammed et al. [2]).

There are several works on fractional calculus, such as the work of Eze and Oyesanya [3], who presented a fractional order climate model in the Pacific Ocean. Eze and Oyesanya [4] also used a fractional model to study the impact of climate change with dominant earth’s fluctuations. In the work of Mohamed and Amnah [5], a numerical technique for the estimation of stochastic response of the Duffing oscillator with fractional order damping driven by white noise excitation was introduced. An approach for solving fractional differential equations using exp-function and (G/G)-expansion method was used in Ahmet et al. [6]. Djurdjica et al. [7] constructed the exact and the approximate solutions of Fuzzy fractional differential equation in the sense of Caputo Hukuhara differentiability with a Fuzzy condition. Rand et al. [8] reviewed the concept of fractional derivatives and derived expressions for the transition curves. Yin [9] applied Legendre spectralcollocation method to obtain approximate solutions of nonlinear multi-order fractional differential equations. Pranay and Rubayyi [10] used Smudu transform and the variable method to solve differential equations and fractional differential equations related to entropy wavelets.

In this work, we shall propose a simple analytical method (which is an elegant combination of a well known methods; perturbation and Laplace methods) to solve non-linear and non-homogeneous fractional differential equations since Laplace method alone is incapable of handling non-linear and non-homogeneous fractional differential equations because of non-linear terms. In particular, we shall analyze the fractional Duffing oscillator using the proposed method.

The advantage of this proposed method over others such as, Adomian decomposition, Modified Laplace decomposition method, (G/G)-expansion, Homotopy perturbation, Yang-Laplace, and so on, is its ability to handle the complicated non-homogeneous part of the fractional differential equation.

2. Definition of special functions in fractional calculus

In this section, we shall give some definitions related to Caputo’s fractional derivative since in Caputo definition of Fractional calculus, we can find a link between what is possible and what is practical. We shall therefore note that our concentration in this presentation will be on Caputo fractional derivative.

Definition 2.1 The Left Caputo Fractional Derivative (LCFD) is defined by [11]

a0c0Dtαu(t)=1Γ(q-α)a0t(t-τ)q-α-1uq(τ)dτ, (1)

where 0 < q − 1 ≤ α < q ,qZ +, t 0 is the initial time and Γ(.) is the Gamma function.

Definition 2.2 The Right Caputo Fractional Derivative (RCFD) is defined by [11]

tc0Db0αu(t)=1Γ(q-α)tb0(τ-t)q-α-1(-1)quq(τ)dτ, (2)

where 0 < q − 1 ≤ α < q ,qZ +, t 0 is the initial time and Γ(.) is the Gamma function.

Definition 2.3 In a Caputo’s sense, the Laplace transform of fractional derivative with order α for a function u(t) is defined by [12]

0e-vtDt0αu(t)dt=vαU(v)-m=0nvα-m-1um(0),

(n-1<αn). (3)

Definition 2.4 A two parameter function of the Mittag-Leffler (ML) function is defined by

Eα,β(z)=j=0zj(αj+β),α>0,β>0. (4)

Definition 2.5 The Laplace transform of ML is given by

L{tam+α-1Eα,β(m)}=m!sα-β(sα-a)m+1. (5)

3. Methodology of the new solution

Now we propose a simple analytical method for solving nonlinear and non-homogeneous fractional differential equations.

To show the basic idea, let us consider the following fractional differential equation:

Dtαu(t;ϵ)+Nu(t;ϵ)+Lu(t;ϵ)=f(t;ϵ), (6)

with intial conditions

Dtβu(0;ϵ)=u(0;ϵ)=0,α>β, (7)

where α = [α 1 2 ,...,α n ], β = [β 1 2 ,...,β n ], indicating fractional orders, Dα=Dα1Dα2,...,Dαn0<αi2, i = 1,2,...,n, N is a nonlinear operators, L is a Linear operator and f is a known function.

Now, we seek to find the solution in order of ∈, say, power of ∈, that is

u(t;ϵ)=n=0unϵn. (8)

We now substitute Eqs. (8) into (6) and (7) and carry out the expansions in terms of the small parameter to obtain the following system of linear fractional differential equations:

Dtαun(t)+Aun(t)=f(t), (9)

with intial conditions

Dtβun(0)=un(0)=0,α>β, (10)

where A is a linear operator.

Therefore, the linear fractional differential Eqs. (9) with initial conditions (10) can now be solved in succession using the fractional differential property of Laplace transform in Eq. (3).

Note that in this method, it is necessary to express the fractional differential equation in dimensionless form to bring out the important dimensionless parameter that govern the behaviour of the system.

To demostrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, let us consider the general form of Duffing equation which is given by [13,14]:

d2x(t¯)dt¯2+adx(t¯)dt¯+bx(t¯)+cx3(t¯)=F(t¯), (11)

with initial conditions

x(0)=ddt¯x(0)=0. (12)

Now, we shall use the proposed fractional operator in Rosales et al. [15,16] to construct a fractional Duffing oscillator. The idea is to introduce an auxiliary parameter (σ) in the system such that this σ must have a dimension in seconds and consistent with the dimension of the ordinary derivative operator. In the work [16], the parameter σ was introduced for the first time, but its geometric interpretation is not treated. After that, this method was applied in the work [15].

Now using the proposed idea, we have

ddt¯1σ1-βdβdt¯β,0<β1,

d2dt¯21σ2-αdαdt¯α,1<α2. (13)

Using (13), the Eq. (11) can be written in terms of fractional time derivatives as:

1σ2-αdαxdt¯α+a1σ1-βdβxdt¯β+bx+cx3=F(t¯). (14)

Now expressing Eq. (14) in dimensionless form, we take initial displacement x 0(t¯) as a characteristic distance, and the system’s angular frequency ω0=k√ as a characteristic time. Thus, we let

u=xx0,t=t¯ω0, (15)

where u and t denote dimensionless quantities.

Therefore, substituting (15) in (14), we have

x0αω0ασ2-αdαudtα+ax0βω0βσ1-βdβudtβ

+bx0u+cx03u3=F(ω0t)

Dtαu+aDtβu+bu+cu3=ϵλcosω(δt), (16)

with initial conditions

u(0)=Dtβu(0)=0, (17)

where

a=ax0β-αω0β-ασα-β-1,b=bx01-αω0ασ2-α,

c=cx03-αω0ασ2-α,ϵ=ω0ασ2-αx0α(0<ϵ1)

and F(ω0t)=λcosω(δt).

The function ω(δt) is a slowly varying (sv) function which is defined as follows:

Definition 3.1 (see R. Bojanic and E. Seneta [17]): ω is a sv function if it is a real-valued, positive, and measurable function on [A,∞), A > 0 , and if

limtω(δt)ω(t)=1, (18)

for every δ > 0.

Therefore, we shall choose ω(δt) = 1 − e −δt , ( 0 < δ << 1) and let ω to be a sv function of t with right hand derivatives of all orders at t = 0, such that ω(0) = 0 and |ω| << 1,

The symbols Dtα and Dtβ are describing the orders of Caputo fractional time derivatives, which is defined in Eqs. (1) and (2).

Now let

u(t;ϵ,δ)=U(t̂,τ;ϵ,δ), (19)

so that

τ=δt, (20)

and

t̂=t+1δ[μ2(τ)ϵ2+μ3(τ)ϵ3+],

μi(0)=0(i=2,3,4,...). (21)

From Eqs. (20) and (21) we have, respectively,

dτdt=δ, (22)

and

t̂τ=1δ[μ2'(τ)ϵ2μ3'(τ)ϵ3+], (23)

t̂t=1, (24)

dudt=Ut̂t̂t+Ut̂t̂τdτdt+Uτdτdt (25)

dudt=Ut̂+Ut̂[μ2'(τ)ϵ2+μ3'(τ)ϵ3+...]+δUτ. (26)

Now using Eq. (26), we have

Dtαu=Ut̂+Ut̂ϕ(ϵ)+δUτα (27)

and

Dtβu=Ut̂+Ut̂ϕ(ϵ)+δUτβ, (28)

where ϕ(ϵ)=μ2'(τ)ϵ2+μ3'(τ)ϵ3+...

Substituting Eqs. (27) and (28) in Eq. (16), we have

Dt̂αU+αϕ(ϵ)Dt̂αU+αδUτDt̂α-1U+...+a[Dt̂βU

βϕ(ϵ)Dt̂βU+βδUτDt̂β-1U+...]+bU+cU3

=ϵλcosω(τ). (29)

We now assume the solution in the following asymptotic series:

U(t̂,τ;ϵ,δ)=j=0i=1Uij(t̂,τ)ϵiδj=ϵ(U10+δU11+...)

+ϵ2(U20+δU21+...)+ϵ3(U30+δU31+...)

+... (30)

Equating equations of order (∈ i j ) in Eq. (29) using the series (30), we obtain the following linear fractional differential equations:

O(ϵ):Dt̂αU10+aDt̂βU10+bU10=λcosω(τ), (31)

O(ϵ,δ):Dt̂αU11+aDt̂βU11+bU11=0, (32)

O(ϵ2):Dt̂αU20+aDt̂βU20+bU20=0 (33)

O(ϵ2,δ):Dt̂αU21+aDt̂βU21+bU21

=-αUτ10Dt̂α-1U10-aβUτ10Dt̂β-1U10, (34)

O(ϵ3):Dt̂αU30+aDt̂βU30+bU30

=-αμ2'Dt̂αU10-aβDt̂βU10-c3(U10)3 (35)

O(ϵ3,δ):Dt̂αU31+aDt̂βU31+bU31=-αμ2'Dt̂αU11

-aβDt̂βU11-αUτ10Dt̂α-1U20

-aβUτ10Dt̂β-1U20-3c3(U10)2U11, (36)

etc.

Now using the scales Eqs. (19)-(21) and the series Eq. (30) on initial conditions Eq. (17), we obtain the following initial conditions:

Uij(0,0)=0ij, (37)

O(ϵ):Dt̂βU1j(0,0)=0j, (38)

O(ϵ2):Dt̂βU20(0,0)=0, (39)

O(ϵ2,δ):Dt̂βU21(0,0)=-βUτ10(0,0)Dt̂β-1U10(0,0), (40)

O(ϵ3):Dt̂βU30(0,0)=-βμ'Dt̂βU10(0,0), (41)

O(ϵ3,δ):Dt̂βU31(0,0)=-βμ'Dt̂βU11(0,0)

-βUτ10(0,0)Dt̂β-1U20(0,0), (42)

etc.

Now, using the fractional differential property of Laplace transform in Eq. (3), we can easly obtain the values of U ij as:

U10=λcosω(τ)b{1+j=0(-1)jj!bjtj(α-β)-β(j+1)-1Eα-β,-β(j+1)j(-at̂α-β)}

+aλcosω(τ)bj=0(-1)jj!bjtα(j-1)-β-2Eα-β,-(α+1)+β(1-j)j(-at̂α-β),

U11=0,U20=0,U21=-L-1L[αUτ10Dt̂α-1U10+aβUτ10Dt̂β-1U10]sα+asβ+b,

U30=-L-1L[αμ2'Dt̂αU10+aβDt̂βU10+c(U10)3]sα+asβ+b,U31=0. (43)

Now, if we substitute the values of U ij which are given in Eq. (43) into Eq. (30) and plot the displacement-time graphs, then we obtain Figs. 1 and 2.

FIGURE 1 Solution in fractional orders, (α = 5/4, β = 3/4), (α = 3/2, β = (1/2) and (α = 7/4, β = 1/4): 

FIGURE 2 Solution in integer orders, α = 2, β = 1, a = 0.2, a * = 0 and a = −0.2. 

4. Conclusion

In this paper, a new analytical method to solve non-linear and non-homogeneous fractional differential equations was proposed. This new analytical method is an elegant combination of well known methods; perturbation and Laplace methods. This method was used to analyze the fractional Duffing oscillator. The performance of this method is reliable, effective and can be used to solve other non-linear and nonhomogeneous fractional differential equations; it can also be extended to solve non-linear and non-homogeneous partial fractional differential equations.

References

1. B. Ross, Hist. Math. 4 (1977) 75. [ Links ]

2. M. Al-Refai, M. Ali Hajji, and M. I. Syam, Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014 (2014) 891837. [ Links ]

3. S. C. Eze and M.O. Oyesanya, J. Fract. Cal. Appl. 10 (2019) 10. [ Links ]

4. S. C. Eze and M.O. Oyesanya, Math. Clim. Weather Forecast. 5 (2019) 1. [ Links ]

5. A.E. Mohamed and S.A. Amnah, J. Fract. Calc. Appl. 4 (2013) 357. [ Links ]

6. B. Ahmet, G. Özkan, H. Ali and B. Anjan, Romaninan J. Phys. 60 (2014) 360. [ Links ]

7. T. Djurdjica, T. Arpal and T. Aleresandur, TWMS J. App. Eng. Math. 4 (2014) 98. [ Links ]

8. R. H. Rand, S. M. Sah, and M. K. Suchorsky, in Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, 2010 (ASME, New York, 2010), p. 873. [ Links ]

9. Y. Yin, Appl. Math. 4 (2013) 113. [ Links ]

10. G. Pranay and T.A. Rubayyi, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 9 (2016) 1944. [ Links ]

11. M. O. Oyesanya, Trans. Of NAMP, 1 (2015) 133; 2 (2016) 325. [ Links ]

12. H. Jafari, C.M. Khalique and M. Nazari, Appl. Math. Lett. 24 (2011) 1799. [ Links ]

13. A. Okasha El-Nady and M. M. A. Lashin, J. Mech. Eng. Autom. 6 (2016) 110. [ Links ]

14. R. Venkatesh, C. Subhadeep and R. Asok, Signal Process. 88 (2008) 339. [ Links ]

15. J. J. Rosales, J. F. Gómez, M. Guia, and V. I. Tkach, in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Laser and Fiber-Optical Networks Modeling, Kharkov, 2011, edited by I. A. Sukhoivanov and O. V. Shulika (IEEE, Kharkov, 2011), p. 1. [ Links ]

16. J. F. Gomez Aguilar, J. J. Rosales-García, J.J. Bernal-Alvarado, T. Cordova-Fraga and R. Guzmán-Cabrera, Rev. Mex. Fis. 58 (2012) 348. [ Links ]

17. R. Bojanic and E. Seneta, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 34 (1971) 302. [ Links ]

Received: October 16, 2019; Accepted: November 27, 2019

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License