Resumen

GLEIZER, Daniela. Foreigners Until Proven Otherwise: Conflicts Around Mexican Nationality in the Supreme Court in the First Half of the Twentieth Century. Hist. mex. [online]. 2020, vol.70, n.2, pp.793-838.  Epub 20-Ene-2021. ISSN 2448-6531.  https://doi.org/10.24201/hm.v70i2.4168.

The objective of this article is to study, through the many cases that were brought before the Supreme Court, the conflicts regarding Mexican nationality in the early decades of the 20th Century, particularly the trials on stripping Mexicans, or those who considered themselves to be such, of their citizenship. At that time, the laws and mechanisms for defining who was a citizen were still in the process of construction, and there was both overlap between conflicting laws as well as legal limbos in which many individuals were trapped. This article addresses the problems faced by citizens who were forced to prove their citizenship, based on the hypothesis that those individuals whose cases reached the Supreme Court shared the characteristic of having been involved in some type of legal or political conflict. Instead of being processed by the courts, certain individuals were stripped of their citizenship in order to be deported under Article 33 of the Constitution, a much more expedited solution than traditional channels, as it did not allow for a defense.

Palabras llave : Denaturalization; Mexican Citizenship; Foreigners; Amparo; Supreme Court; Article 33.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )