Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Español (pdf)
Artículo en XML
Referencias del artículo
Traducción automática
Enviar artículo por emailIndicadores
Citado por SciELO 
Accesos
Links relacionados
Similares en
SciELO
Compartir
Permalink
Cirugía y cirujanos
versión On-line ISSN 2444-054Xversión impresa ISSN 0009-7411
Resumen
REVOREDO-REGO, Fernando et al. Distal pancreatectomy: experience in a National Hospital. Cir. cir. [online]. 2022, vol.90, n.3, pp.338-344. Epub 06-Jun-2022. ISSN 2444-054X. https://doi.org/10.24875/ciru.20001247.
Aims:
To compare the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing open DP (ODP) and laparoscopic DP (LDP); and to analyze the association between the section site of the pancreas and pancreatic fistula.
Materials and methods:
Clinical, perioperative, and histopathologic data of patients who underwent ODP and LDP between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.
Results:
70 patients were included. 39 (56%) underwent ODP and 31 (44%) underwent LDP. The tumor size in ODP group was 70mm and in LDP group was 45mm (p = 0,032) Blood loss was lower in LDP group (229mL versus 498mL) (p = 0,001). Operative time, spleen preservation, B/C pancreatic fistula, major morbidity, reoperation, and length of hospital stay, were similar in both groups. There was no postoperative mortality. No differences were found in B/C pancreatic fistula rate regarding to pancreatic transection site.
Conclusions:
LDP is a safe procedure, with perioperative outcomes similar to ODP and with less blood loss. The pancreatic transection site did not influence post-operative pancreatic fistula rate.
Palabras llave : Distal pancreatectomy; Laparoscopy; Transection site; Pancreatic fistula.
