SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9Evaluación de la radiación solar UV-B en Tepic, Nayarit: implicaciones en el turismo de Sol y playa.Evaluación in vitro de la actividad antimicrobiana de dos tipos de aceite esencial de orégano (Lippia berlandieri) contra bacterias de estanques de camarón. índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista bio ciencias

versión On-line ISSN 2007-3380

Revista bio ciencias vol.9  Tepic  2022  Epub 12-Abr-2024

https://doi.org/10.15741/revbio.09.e1339 

Original articles

Poblaciones de maíz seleccionadas para calidad de elote a partir de un compuesto de maíz de la raza jala

Maize populations selected for fresh corn ear quality from a composite of race jala maize

A. Rojas-Polanco1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4376-6746

J.A. Aguilar-Castillo1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4994-9084

R. Valdivia-Bernal1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3428-1827

V.A. Vidal-Martínez2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0368-3524

C.R. Juárez-Rosete1 

P.G. Ruelas-Hernández1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6366-6251

1Unidad Académica de Agricultura. Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit. Nayarit, México

2INIFAP Campo Experimental Santiago IxcuintlaNayarit, México


RESUMEN

En México se carece de maíces eloteros mejorados a partir de maíces locales, por lo que se requieren estrategias de selección eficientes para mejorar los maíces nativos con características especiales. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar 16 poblaciones de maíz denominadas RC1F2 seleccionadas para calidad de elote a partir de un compuesto de maíz de la Raza Jala (C1SMJ). La siembra se hizo en el año 2013 en condiciones de secano, en cuatro localidades del estado de Nayarit, bajo un diseño en bloques completos al azar con tres repeticiones. La parcela útil fue de cuatro surcos de 5 m de largo y una distancia entre ellos de 0.80 m. Se midieron variables agronómicas y de calidad de elote. Las poblaciones mejoradas RC1F2 fueron tardías y de porte alto comparado con el híbrido elotero A-7573. En longitud de elote, el 25 % superó al A7573, mientras que en sólidos solubles un 69 % lo igualaron. En rendimiento de elote, el 58 % de las poblaciones mejoradas superaron al A-7573 en promedio con 2.156 t ha-1, lo que evidenció que las RC1F2 evaluadas a partir de la selección familial practicada en la variedad Jala (C1SMJ) favoreció la acumulación de alelos favorables para tamaño y calidad de elote.

PALABRAS CLAVE: zea mays; retrocruzas; grados Brix y rendimiento de elote.

ABSTRACT

In Mexico, there is a shortage of fresh corn ears selected from landrace maize, so efficient selection strategies are required to improve native maize with special traits. Hence, the objective of the present work was to evaluate 16 maize populations named RC1F2 selected for fresh corn quality from a composite of Raza Jala maize (C1SMJ). Planting was done in 2013, under rainfed conditions in four locations in the state of Nayarit, under a randomized complete block design with three replications. The useful plot consisted of four rows of 5 m long and 0.80 m between them. Agronomic and quality variables were measured. The improved populations RC1F2 were late and tall compared to the hybrid A-7573. In corn length, 25% surpassed A-7573, while 69 % were equal in soluble solids. In yield of tender ears, 58 % of the improved populations surpassed A-7573 on average with 2.156 t ha-1, which showed that the RC1F2 evaluated from the family selection practiced on the Jala variety (C1SMJ) favored the accumulation of favorable alleles for corn size and quality.

KEY WORDS: Zea mays; backcross; degrees Brix and yield tender maize

Introduction

In Mexico, fresh corn consumption is part of the multiple uses of maize in the Mexican diet, as it has a culinary tradition and many popular festivities, it can be consumed roasted, boiled, in soups, puddings, or canned. This tradition has been inherited from Mesoamerican people and pre-Hispanic cultures to Mexicans for hundreds of years. The Mexican natives were the ones who made maize evolve, formed the native breeds, and through interracial crosses, gave rise to modern landraces, from which the current high-yielding hybrids have been obtained (Márquez-Sánchez, 2008). In this sense, the native races of maize that stand out as fresh corn in western Mexico are Jala, Tabloncillo, Bofo, Harinoso de Ocho, Elotero de Sinaloa, Elotes Occidentales, and Dulce (Ortega-Paczka, 2003; Ron-Parra et al., 2006), which were empirically selected by Mexican farmers for this purpose.

Fresh corn ears production represents advantages over grain production; the production cycle is shortened, ear rot and storage pests are avoided, and the rest of the plant can be used for forage (Ortiz-Torres et al., 2013). In 2020, an area of 69,893 hectares of corn was cultivated in Mexico for fresh corn production with a yield of 947,998 tons and an average production of 14.6 t ha-1; the states of Puebla (15,599 ha), Jalisco (8,105 ha), and State of Mexico (4,907 ha) were the main producers (SIAP, 2020).

Currently, in the country there is a lack of improved maize especially for the fresh corn ear market, although farmers use native seeds to supply local markets, as is the case of varieties of Cacahuacintle (Jasso-Bobadilla et al., 2019; Osorio-Saenz et al., 2019), Chalqueños and Elotes Cónicos in central Mexico (Osorio-Saenz et al., 2019) or plant commercial maize hybrids with suitable attributes for commercialization, such as the case of Monsanto's A-7573 for larger areas (Andrés-Meza et al., 2017).

In general, maize breeders have made limited use of the diversity safeguarded by Mexican farmers, since they work mainly with four landraces, Chalqueño and Cónico for the Mesa Central, Celaya for the Bajío, and Tuxpeño for the Gulf region (Márquez-Sánchez, 2008); however, there are 49 racial groups in Mexico (Sánchez & Goodman, 1992), with a wide possibility of use to make genetic improvement with a specific quality. In this sense, Coutiño-Estrada et al. (2010a) identified in the state of Chiapas maize of the Tuxpeño race with excellent traits for fresh corn, especially for length and sweet flavor due to its sugar content (up to 13.8 ° Brix). Meanwhile, Ortiz-Torres et al. (2013) reported high fresh corn yield variation and other quality indicators among maize populations in the Tehuacán Valley, Puebla.

By utilizing the diversity of native Mexican maize, fresh corn quality could be improved through an intrapopulation recurrent selection scheme, which increases the frequency of genes for quantitative traits that accumulate in selection cycles (Hallauer et al., 2010), as proposed by Coutiño-Estrada et al. (2010b) in native populations of the Tuxpeño race and Valdivia-Bernal et al. (2010) in a maize of the Jala landrace, where they found that additive effects were the most important for sweetness and fresh corn length in a diallel cross. However, fresh corn ear quality traits are also caused by the wide variability of pericarp thickness and endosperm starch texture (Paliwal et al., 2001), so they should also be considered as selection criteria in a breeding program.

Márquez-Sánchez (1990) proposed the limited backcross breeding method to use and increase grain yield in native populations of maize, and consists of crossing improved varieties (donor) with native populations (recurrent) and subsequently making only one backcross to the original population. Márquez-Sánchez et al. (2000) called these original populations with backcrossing, – improved varieties and pointed out that there is a grain yield superiority of up to 25.6 % over their original counterparts. With this methodology, Vázquez-Sánchez et al. (2003) developed improved maize varieties with higher yields than the original native variety, up to 30 %, and meet the quality specifications of the native varieties.

Currently, there is limited information on fresh corn ear varieties formed from any breeding scheme using native maize. The limited backcrossing scheme proposed by Márquez-Sánchez (1990) and applied by Márquez-Sánchez et al. (2000) and Vázquez-Carrillo et al. (2003), among others, has focused on increasing grain yield with the direct use of native maize, without pre-breeding. Therefore, the objective of the present work was to evaluate the potential and quality of fresh corn ear from maize populations formed from the best half-sib families of a maize composite of the Jala race that were backcrossed to an improved variety.

Material and Methods

Selection procedures and methods

In 2009, 64 half-sib families were selected for fresh corn ear size and stability of a maize composite of the Jala race named C1SMJ, which were crossed with the TX UAN tester, which is an improved maize population obtained through mass selection. In 2010, the best eight test crosses (half-sib families x improved variety) were evaluated and selected by high specific combining ability (SCA). In 2011 the best eight crosses with SCA were crossed to both parents (C1SMJ and TX UAN), thus, in 2012 the eight backcrosses were advanced to the F2 generation through fraternal crosses, giving a total of 16 varieties called RC1F2 which constitute the basis for the present study.

The genetic materials were essayed in the 2013 spring-summer cycle, under rainfed conditions, in four locations in the state of Nayarit. The sowing dates were: on June 13 in Xalisco (21°25' 42.80''N and 104°53'22.06'' W), on July 2 in Jala (21°05'31.92'' N and 104°26'27. 15'' W), on July 8 in Tetitlán (21°08'12.06'' N and 104°36'35.53'' W) and on July 21 in San José de Mojarras (21°26'03.16'' N and 104°35'26.90'' W). The trial included as controls the TX UAN parents, the maize composite of the Jala race (C1SMJ), and the commercial hybrids A-7573 from the company Asgrow-Monsanto recognized in the national market for fresh corn ear production (Valdivia-Bernal et al., 2010) and H-561 from the National Institute of Agricultural and Livestock Research (INIFAP), which is resistant to ear rot and has excellent characteristics for the nixtamalized flour industry (Coutiño-Estrada et al., 2013).

The experimental design used was a completely randomized block design with three replications per location with a useful plot of four rows of five meters by 0.80 cm wide, two seeds were sown per stroke to then leave one plant, the density was 62,000 plants ha-1. Agronomic management was carried out according to INIFAP recommendations for the state of Nayarit (Vidal-Martínez, 1993).

Variables evaluated in plant

The variables evaluated were silking days (SD), tassel days (TD), plant height (PH), and ear height (EH) in centimeters, according to the descriptors of Carballo-Carballo and Benítez-Vázquez (2003).

Tests for fresh corn ear quality

The sample size was two fresh corn per replicate chosen randomly from the useful plot. The harvested corn was left with its husk cover in a cellar at room temperature for 36 h to simulate the time from harvest to consumption. After this time, quality data were obtained. The corn of the RC1F2, TX UAN, and JC1SM varieties were cut at the R3 reproductive stage, while the commercial hybrids were cut at the R4 stage (Lafitte, 1994). This was done based on the differences in the flowering and grain filling dates of the varieties (Lafitte, 1994).

The variables for quality were stalk length in cm (PL), fresh corn length in cm (GEL), and ear diameter in mm (GED) according to the descriptors of Carballo-Carballo & Benítez-Vázquez (2003). Also in two replications, the average fresh weight of 100 kernels was determined, which were subsequently subjected for 72 hours to drying in an oven at 70 ± 1 °C obtaining the dry weight of grain in g, with these data the percentage of moisture (MOI) was calculated according to the equation of Stubsgaard (1997), to quantify the soluble solids in the juice that was extracted from a sample of 20 kernels per fresh corn ear (Ortiz-Torres et al., 2013), which was placed in an ATAGO® digital refractometer, data were expressed in Brix degrees (BRI).

The yield of fresh corn ear (YI)

In a sample of three randomly cut fresh corn ear per experimental unit, without leaves and peduncle, yield (t ha-1) was determined. This was done to avoid biases induced by differences between genotype organs.

Statistical analysis

For each variable, a combined ANOVA of locations was performed. The genotypes were considered as fixed effects and the environments as random effects, testing these in the F test against the nesting of replications within environments, whose model was:

Yijk= µ+Li+ Rj(Li)+ Gk+ Li x Gk+ Eijk

Where Yijk = observed value of the j-th replicate nested in the i-th location of the k-th genotype, µ= effect of the general mean, Li = effect of the i-th location, Rj(Li)= effect of the j-th replicate nested in the i-th location, Gk= effect of the k-th genotype, Li x Gk= effect of the interaction of i-th location of k-th genotype, Eijk= effect of the experimental error. Obtained data were analyzed with the GLM procedure of the SAS V.9.0 statistical package (SAS Institute, 2002) and Tukey tests were also performed for the comparison of averages.

Results and Discussion

In the combined ANOVA, significance (p ≤ 0.01) was detected among genotypes (Table 1), for seven of the variables analyzed: silking and tassel days, plant height, ear height, fresh corn length, Brix degrees, and fresh corn ear yield. The fresh corn diameter, peduncle length and percent moisture content were not significant. The detection of statistical differences among genotypes indicates the presence of variability among them, as reported by formerly reported by other authors (Coutiño-Estrada et al., 2010a, Martín-López et al., 2008).

Table 1 Mean squares of the combined analysis of variance for fresh corn ear quality and yield variables in Jala Race and controls 

Variable Loc Re(Loc) Gen Gen x Loc Error CV %
SD 619.875** 2.194ns 120.893** 3.750** 1.221 1.501
TD 644.572** 2.258ns 124.374** 4.322** 1.389 1.561
PH 31099.408** 2531.700ns 8124.111** 851.213** 677.680 9.080
EH 11694.722** 1079.250ns 5726.866** 562.846ns 469.301 15.295
GEL 115.569** 3.230 ns 16.859** 3.953ns 3.403 8.753
GED 0.130ns 0.128 ns 0.085 ns 0.072ns 0.113 7.309
PL 32.903** 0.941ns 4.712 ns 4.154ns 3.175 28.847
BRIX 43.382** 3.115 ns 6.571** 2.439ns 1.615 15.485
MOI YI 277.040ns 71.395** 104.050ns 1.571ns 189.030 ns 7.754** 58.947ns 6.928** 57.081 0.839 11.870 6.193

Significant differences = ** (p ≤ 0.01); ns: not significant, respectively; Loc: locality; Gen: Genotype; Re(Loc): Repetition (Locality); Gen x Loc: Genotype x Locality; CV= Coefficient of variation.

Between locations (Table 1) there were significances (p ≤ 0.01) for the variables of silking days, tassel days, plant height, ear height, fresh corn ear length, peduncle length, Brix degrees, and fresh corn yield. Fresh corn diameter and percent moisture content were not significantly different. The significance of the variables among locations corroborates the influence of the environment on genotypes in the overall average fresh corn quality and yield, as observed by Ortiz-Torres et al. (2013).

The Gen x Loc interaction was significant (p ≤ 0.01) in four variables: silking and tassel days, plant height, and fresh corn yield. These differences in the behavior of genotypes across environments should be taken into account to avoid discarding varieties that may be superior in a given environment, as observed by López-Guzmán et al. (2018) in Jala maize populations. However, this research was conflicting with reports in a similar study performed by Coutiño-Estrada et al. (2010b) and Martín-López et al. (2008) for most of the fresh corn quality variables.

Regarding silking and tassel days, the variety C1SMJ was statistically (p ≤ 0.05) superior to other genotypes (Figures 1A and B), the backcrosses to the parent (C1SMJ) had an SD between 73 and 76 days and a TD between 75-78 days, while the group of varieties with – of TX UAN presented between 71 to 74 days for SD and between 72 to 76 days for TD (Figure 1A and B). These results indicate that the performance shown by these genotypes was intermediate when compared to its parents. The commercial hybrids A 7573 and H-561 showed an early performance, 65 and 67 days, respectively. By environment, it was observed that the varieties were earlier in San José de Mojarras than in the other locations, possibly due to the delayed sowing date and the lower altitude of this location (Figures 2A and B).

Backcrosses to the C1SMJ (donor) parent families were 32 and 55 % higher in plant and ear than the commercial controls (A-7573 and H-561) but 21 and 27 % lower in plant and ear than the C1SMJ variety, which was statistically the highest genotype (Figures 1C and D). On the other hand, the backcrosses to the recurrent donor (TX UAN) were 25 and 61 % taller in plant and ear than the commercial controls that presented on average 227 and 97 cm, respectively. These varieties were very similar in plant height to the TX UAN parent; however, 56 % of these backcrosses had a lower ear height (Figures 1C and D), so the genetic improvement achieved by limited backcrossing using half-sib families selected from the C1SMJ variety was effective to obtain varieties with better agronomic traits.

Means with the same letter are statically equal (Tukey, 0.05).

Figure 1 Silking days (A), Tassel days (B), Plant height (C), Ear height (D), and Fresh corn ear length (E) in maize population selected from a composite of race Jala. 

Means with the same letter are statically equal (Tukey, 0.05).

Figure 2 Silking days (A), Tassel days (B), Plant and ear height (C), Fresh corn ear, and peduncle length (D) in environments. 

The environment where plant and ear height were best expressed was San José de Mojarras, with an average of 308 and 161 cm, respectively (Figures 1C and 1D); while in the locality of Jala, plants were smaller, with an HP of 247 cm and HE of 120 cm, possibly attributed to low humidity and fertility of the soils (Aguilar-Castillo & Carballo-Carballo, 2007).

In the fresh corn length variable, the C1SMJ parent was the largest with an average of 25.2 cm, but statistically equal to the varieties RC-302, RC-307, and RC-301. Meanwhile, 25% of the backcrosses statistically outperformed the control (A-7573) which showed the smallest fresh corn at 18 cm long (Figure 1E). These results indicate that the selection in families made in variety C1SMJ made it possible to better control the ear length trait; hence, it is important to perform pre-breeding in native varieties and subsequently cross them with improved maize, as proposed by Coutiño-Estrada et al. (2010a). In addition, it is important to highlight the importance of the Jala landrace as a source of alleles to obtain varieties with greater fresh corn length, as suggested by Valdivia-Bernal et al. (2010). In general, the backcrosses evaluated showed adequate sizes for the fresh corn market, since according to Tracy (2000) the preferred type size is about 20 to 23 cm. With respect to the environments, the largest sizes were obtained in Xalisco (23 cm) and in Tetitlán, with the lowest average (19 cm); the above was a reflection of the behavior of the varieties in the evaluation environments, as observed by Coutiño-Estrada et al. (2015) in native varieties from Chiapas.

In soluble solids content, 69 % of the backcrosses were statistically equal to the commercial controls A-7573 and H-561, which presented the highest averages with 10.0 and 9.96 ° Brix (Figure 3A). The backcrosses with 25 % germplasm of the Jala variety obtained on average higher soluble solids content (8.21 °Brix) than those formed with 75 % of the C1SMJ variety (7.6 °Brix). The results were like those of the parents, TX UAN and C1SMJ, but very different from the values reported by Valdivia-Bernal et al. (2010) for a local population of the Jala landrace (2.53 °Brix) or for the hybrid A-7573 (1.65 °Brix), possibly due to the equipment used to measure soluble solids in their study. Between environments, it was observed that the highest Brix content was obtained in the Tetitlán locality, while the lowest values were observed in Jala and Xalisco, a consequence of the variability between localities (Figure 4A), as reported by Coutiño-Estrada et al. (2015), in similar work.

Observed differences in the grain soluble solids content could also be caused by the grain maturity stage at the moment that the measurement was made. In this sense, the commercial corn hybrids were analyzed at the R4 maturity stage, while the backcrosses and their parents at the R3 maturity stage. These details should be considered when measuring total soluble solids since Hale et al. (2005) mention that the maturity stage of fresh corn affects sucrose and total sugars in sweet corn with the su, se, and sh 2 genes since they have higher values at later stages and the concentration varies between and within phenotypes. Therefore, it can be inferred that the criteria for quantitative quality of fresh corn ear in Mexican maize vary between and within populations, as well as between types of corn, and to date, what prevails in the country's supply markets is mainly limited to a uniform size of fresh corn and that it has a longer shelf life.

Means with the same letter are statically equal (Tukey, 0.05)

Figure 3 Grades Brix (A) and Fresh Corn Yield (B) in maize population selected from a composite of race Jala. 

In fresh corn ear yield, from the 16 RC1F2 backcrosses evaluated, six formed the superior statistical group and when comparing the backcrosses with the commercial control A-7573, 58 % exceeded it on average with 2.156 t ha-1 (Figure 3B). This result evidences the genetic contribution of family selection in the Jala variety (C1SMJ) to form the backcrosses that were the basis of this study, where RC205 stood out with 16.541 t ha-1 (Figure 3B) and supports that the previous improvement made in the germplasm of the Jala race was adequate to form corn populations. Regarding locations, San José de Mojarras showed the highest yield with 16.9 t ha-1, which confirms the influence of the environment on fresh corn yield, as observed by Ortiz-Torres et al. (2013), in previous evaluations.

Means with the same letter are statically equal (Tukey, 0.05).

Figure 4 Grades Brix (A), Moisture (B), and Fresh corn Yield (C) in environments. 

Conclusions

The improved populations were generally later between 6 and 11 days than the commercial control fresh corn (A-7573) and were taller in plant and ear height. Twenty-five percent exceeded the A-7573 control in fresh corn length and 69% of the varieties were statistically equal in soluble solids (10 °Brix). For fresh corn ear yield, 58 % of the backcrosses surpassed the control A-7573 with 2.156 t ha-1, which showed that the RC1F2 evaluated from the family selection practiced in the Jala variety (C1SMJ) promoted the accumulation of favorable alleles for fresh corn size and quality, hence it is suggested that to achieve better results, it is necessary to make pre-improvement in native varieties and subsequently cross them with improved maize to obtain populations with better agronomic traits and higher fresh corn yield.

References

Aguilar-Castillo, J. A., & Carballo-Carballo, A. (2007). Recuperación, conservación y aprovechamiento de la raza Jala de maíz: Una alternativa para las razas en peligro de extinción. Colegio de Posgraduados y Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de Semillas. [ Links ]

Andrés-Meza, P., Rodríguez-Montalvo, F. A., Sierra-Macías, M., Leyva-Ovalle, O. R., Palafox-Caballero, A., Espinosa-Calderón, A., Tadeo-Robledo, M., Vázquez-Carrillo, M. G., Gómez-Montiel, N. O., Herrera-Corredor, A., Cebada-Merino, M., Del Rosario-Arellano, J. L., López-Romero, G., & Nájera-Contreras, R. (2017). Híbridos de maíz con potencial para producción de elote en regiones tropicales de México. In: Seguridad Alimentaria: Aportaciones Científicas y Agrotecnológicas. J. Martínez-Herrera, M.A. Ramírez-Guillermo y J. Cámara-Córdova (Eds) pp. 125-129. UJAT Villahermosa, Tabasco, México. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jorge_Herrera13/publication/321288944_Seguridad_Alimentaria_Aportaciones_Cientificas_y_Tecnologicas/links/5a18f918a6fdcc50ade7edd2/Seguridad-Alimentaria-Aportaciones-Cientificas-y-Tecnologicas.pdf Links ]

Carballo-Carballo, A., & Benítez-Vázquez, A. (2003). Manual Gráfico para la Descripción Varietal del Maíz (Zea mays L.). Segunda Edición. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA). Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de Semillas (SNICS). Colegio de Postgraduados. Montecillo, México. [ Links ]

Coutiño-Estrada, B., Vidal-Martínez, V .A., Cruz-Gómez, B., & Cruz-Vázquez, C. (2010a). Aptitud combinatoria general y específica del contenido de azúcares en maíces criollos eloteros. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 33 (Esp4), 57-61. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/610/61014255010.pdfLinks ]

Coutiño-Estrada, B., Vidal-Martínez, V. A., & Sánchez-Grajalez, G. (2010b). Selección de maíces criollos con calidad elotera bajo condiciones de riego y temporal en Chiapas. En: Mejoramiento, Conservación y Uso de los Maíces Criollos. M. B. Nájera-Rincón & C. A. Ramírez-Mandujano (eds). Pp. 178-190. Publicación Especial. Sociedad Mexicana de Fitogenética. Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. México. D. F. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=5780323&pid=S1027-152X201300020000800010&lng=esLinks ]

Coutiño-Estrada, B., Salinas-Moreno, Y., Gómez-Montiel, N., & Vidal-Martínez, V. A. (2013). ‘H-561’nuevo híbrido de maíz resistente a pudriciones de mazorca para regiones tropicales. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana , 36(1), 85-87. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0187-73802013000100010Links ]

Coutiño-Estrada, B., Vidal-Martínez, V.A. Cruz-Vázquez, C., & Gómez-González, M. (2015). Características eloteras y de grano de variedades nativas de Chiapas. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 6(5), 119-1127. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v6i5.603 [ Links ]

Hale, T. A., Hassell, R. L., & Phillips, T. (2005). Refractometer measurements of soluble solid concentration do not reliably predict sugar content in sweet corn. HortTechnology, 15(3), 668-672. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.15.3.0668 [ Links ]

Hallauer, A. R., Carena, M. J., & Miranda, F. J. B. (2010). Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Ed. Springer 3rd edición. USA. 664 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0766-0 [ Links ]

Jasso-Bobadilla, G., Pérez-López, D. J., González-Huerta, D., Sangerman-Jarquin, D. M., & Navarro-Bravo, A. (2019). Estudio preliminar para determinar diferencias fenotípicas y tamaño de muestra en maíz Cacahuancintle. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas , 10(8), 1771-1782. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v10i8.1765 [ Links ]

Lafitte, H. R. (1994). Identificación de problemas en la producción de maíz tropical: Guía de campo. Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo. México, D.F. https://repository.cimmyt.org/handle/10883/727Links ]

López-Guzmán, J. A., Aguilar-Castillo, J. A., García-Zavala, J. J., & Lobato-Ortíz, R. (2018). Adaptabilidad y estabilidad de longitud de mazorca de maíz raza jala en cinco ambientes. Revista Bio Ciencias, 5(nesp2), e472. http://dx.doi.org/10.15741/revbio.05.03.02 [ Links ]

Martín-López, L., Ron-Parra, J., Sánchez-González, J. J., De la Cruz-Larios, L., Morales-Rivera, M. M., Carrera-Valtierra, J. A., Ortega-Corona, A., Vidal-Martínez, V. A., & Guerrero-Herrera, J. M. (2008). Caracterización agronómica y morfológica de maíces nativos del noroccidente de México. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana , 31(4), 331-340. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=61031405Links ]

Márquez-Sánchez, F. (1990). Backcross theory for maize. I. Homozygosis and heterosis. Maydica, 35:17-22. [ Links ]

Márquez-Sánchez, F., Sahagún-Castellanos, L., Carrera-Valtierra, J. A., & Barrera-Gutiérrez, E. (2000). Retrocruza limitada para el mejoramiento de maíces criollos. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Chapingo, México. [ Links ]

Márquez-Sánchez, F. (2008) De las variedades criollas de maíz (Zea mays L.) a los híbridos transgénicos. I. Recolección de germoplasma y variedades mejoradas. Agricultura, Sociedad y Desarrollo, 5(2), 151-166 http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/asd/v6n2/v6n2a2.pdfLinks ]

Ortega-Paczka, R. (2003). La diversidad del maíz en México. En: Sin maíz no hay país. Culturas populares de México. México D.F. [ Links ]

Ortiz-Torres, E., Antonio-López, P., Gil-Muñoz, A., Guerrero-Rodríguez, J. D., López-Sánchez, H., Taboada-Gaytán, O. R, Hernández-Guzmán, J. A., & Valdez-Ramírez, M. (2013). Rendimiento y calidad de elote en poblaciones nativas de maíz de Tehuacán, Puebla. Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura, 19 (2), 225- 238. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/609/60927902008.pdfLinks ]

Osorio-Saenz, A., Santacruz-Varela, A., Córdova-Téllez, L., GonzálezHernández, V. A., Mascorro-Gallardo, J. O., Conde-Martínez, F. V., & Carrillo-Castañeda, G. (2019). Mexican maize landrace for corn on the cob production at the Central Highlands. Maydica electronic publication , 64(2). https://journals-crea.4science.it/index.php/maydica/article/view/1942/1237Links ]

Paliwal, R. L., Granados, G., Lafitte, H. R., Violic, A. D., & Marathée, J. P. (2001). El Maíz en los Trópicos: Mejoramiento y Producción, FAO, Departamento de Agricultura. Roma. https://www.fao.org/3/x7650s/x7650s00.htmLinks ]

Ron-Parra, J., Sánchez-González, J., Jiménez, C.A., Carrera-Valtierra, J. A., Martin-López, J., Morales, R. M.; De La Cruz-Larios, L., Hurtado-De la Peña, S. A., Mena-Munguía, S., & Rodríguez-Flores, J. G. (2006). Maíces nativos del Occidente de México I. Colectas 2004 SCENTIA - CUCBA. http://www.cucba.udg.mx/sites/default/files/publicaciones1/page_scientia_cucba/Scientia-CUCBA%208(1).pdfLinks ]

SAS Institute. 2002. SAS user´s guide; Statistic.SAS Institute. Cary, NC. USA [ Links ]

Servicio de información Agroalimentario y Pesquera (2020). Cierre de la producción agrícola nacional en el año 2020. Disponible en Disponible en https://www.siap.gob.mx/cierre-de-la-producción.agricola.nacional/ consultado el 24 de junio de 2021. [ Links ]

Sánchez, G. J. J., & M. M. Goodman (1992) Relationships among the Mexican races of maize. Economic Botany, 46, 72-85 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985256 [ Links ]

Stubsgaard, F. (1997). Calibration of seed moisture meter. Technical Note no. 47. Danida Forest Seed Centre Humlebeak, Denmark. https://forskning.ku.dk/soeg/result/?pure=files%2F40335596%2FTN47_FINAL.pdfLinks ]

Tracy, W. F. (2000). Sweet corn. En: Specialty Corns. Hallauer, A. R. (ed). pp. 147-187. CRC Press. Second Edition. Boca Raton, Florida. United States of America. http://pustakapertanianub.staff.ub.ac.id/files/2012/12/Specialty-Corns.pdfLinks ]

Valdivia-Bernal, R., Caro-Velarde, F., Medina-Torres, R., Ortiz-Catón, M., Espinosa-Calderón, A., Vidal-Martínez, V. A., & Ortega-Corona, A. (2010). Contribución genética del criollo Jala en variedades eloteras del maíz. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana , 33(Esp4), 63-67. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0187-73802010000500013&lng=es&nrm=isoLinks ]

Vázquez-Carrillo, M. G., Guzmán-Báez, L., Andrés-García, J. L., Márquez-Sánchez, F., & Castillo-Merino, J. (2003). Calidad de grano y tortillas de maíces criollos y sus retrocruzas. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana , 26 (4), 231-238. https://revistafitotecniamexicana.org/documentos/26-4/3a.pdfLinks ]

Vidal-Martínez, V. A. (1993). Guía para cultivar maíz elotero de riego en Nayarit. Secretaria de Agricultura y Recurso Hidráulicos. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias. Centro de Investigaciones del Pacífico Centro, Nayarit. Campo Experimental “Santiago Ixcuintla”. Santiago, Ixcuintla, Nayarit, México. [ Links ]

Recibido: 17 de Marzo de 2022; Aprobado: 05 de Octubre de 2022; Publicado: 15 de Octubre de 2022

*Corresponding Author: J. A. Aguilar-Castillo. Carretera Tepic-Compostela Km. 9. C. P. 63780, Xalisco, Nayarit. Phone: 311 7407661. E-mail: juan.aguilar@uan.edu.mx . http://www.uan.edu.mx/es/unidad-academica-de-agricultura

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons