SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 número26Habitabilidad de la vivienda emergente para trabajadores migrantes en Villa de Arista, San Luis Potosí índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Nova scientia

versión On-line ISSN 2007-0705

Resumen

STINCER-GOMEZ, Dení; COULO, Ana Claudia  y  MONROY NASR, Zuraya. The ontogenetic, psychological, and epistemological nature of errors and obstacles in the construction of scientific hypotheses: a case study. Nova scientia [online]. 2021, vol.13, n.26, 00024.  Epub 30-Ago-2021. ISSN 2007-0705.  https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v13i26.2691.

An analysis of the argumentative discourse of postgraduate students of six different cohorts of the Faculty of Psychology of the National Autonomous University of Mexico, shows us a set of obstacles and systematic errors in the process of construction of a hypothesis (the latter being the hypothesis to defend in their thesis). In this paper, we argue that the nature of these errors and obstacles is ontogenetic, psychological, and epistemological. Ontogenetic obstacles are related to the primacy, reinforced through evolution, of natural logic over formal logic in problem solving. . The arbitrariness of language exacerbates difficulties in communicating a hypothesis. The psychological nature of errors has to do with a position of the individual towards evidence and scientific activity. The content of the evidence may be repressed or rejected because it constitutes a destabilization of the subject’s identity or of beliefs that have a function of ego support. We also perceive the subject's epistemic dependence on their thesis advisors that prevents them from affirming their own work. We observe there is a belief that academic work, rather than a process of knowledge building, is an evaluative activity of the self. Other errors and obstacles are related to questions specific to scientific activity. A hypothesis generally manifests causal relationships. The notion of cause and its nature, from the philosophy of science, is debatable. In the present article, we propose these explanations regarding the difficulties in the process of constructing a scientific hypothesis.

Palabras llave : hypothesis; argumentative discourse; systematic errors; epistemological obstacles; thesis; ontogenesis; psychology; science; epistemology; discourse.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )