SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.12 número4Supply Chain Disruptions Propagation Caused by Criminal ActsTwo-Phase Decision Support Methodology for Design and Planning an Outcome-Driven Supply Chain índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Journal of applied research and technology

versión On-line ISSN 2448-6736versión impresa ISSN 1665-6423

J. appl. res. technol vol.12 no.4 Ciudad de México ago. 2014

 

Order Variability Decomposition: A New Variability Measure on Real Data

 

M.M. Monsreal1*, J.A. Royo2 and M.P. Lambán3

 

1' 2' 3 Manufacturing and Design Engineering Department, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Aragón, España. * mmonsreal@cli-mexico.org

1 Centro Latinoamericano de Innovación en Logística-México México.

 

ABSTRACT

It has been shown that, at least in simulated scenarios of variability decomposition in size and frequency, the way these components are measured largely determines the shape of their relationships. This study aims to build on this specific finding and tests how these measures of variability components behave on real data. Moreover, getting advantage of the type of available data, several models are setup to assess amplification on such variability components, and to evaluate the impact of the product type on both: amplification and component variability behaviors. We do this by performing model assessment with the traditional un-weighted C.V. measure, and then replicating the same evaluation with the recently proposed ADV measure.

Keywords: Variability Components, Measure, Real Data, Amplification.

 

RESUMEN

Se ha demostrado que, al menos en escenarios simulados de descomposición de variabilidad, en tamaño y frecuencia, la manera en que se miden estos componentes determina en gran medida la forma de sus relaciones. Este estudio tiene como objetivo construir en este descubrimiento específico y evalúa cómo estas medidas de los componentes de variabilidad se comportan con datos reales. Además, aprovechando el tipo de información disponible, varios modelos son configurados para evaluar amplificación en dichos componentes de variabilidad, y analizar el impacto del tipo de producto en la amplificación y los comportamientos de variabilidad de los mencionados componentes. Hacemos esto mediante análisis de modelos utilizando la medida tradicional C.V. no-ponderado, y luego replicar la misma evaluación con la medida ADV propuesta recientemente.

 

DESCARGAR ARTÍCULO EN FORMATO PDF

 

References

[1] M. Cedillo-Campos, C. Sánchez-Ramírez. (2013). Dynamic Self-Assessment of Supply Chains Performance: an Emerging Market Approach. Journal of Applied Research and Technology Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 338-347.         [ Links ]

[2] Rodríguez, E., de Luca, A., Meraz, M. & Alvarez-Ramirez, J. (2005). Breakdown of scaling properties in abnormal heart rate variability. Journal of Applied Research and Technology Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 82-97.         [ Links ]

[3] Inderfurth, K., Mukherje, K. (2007). Decision support for spare parts acquisition in post product life cycle. Central European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 16, pp. 17-42.         [ Links ]

[4] Bivin D.G. (1996). Bunching in the Production Process, Economics Letters, Vol. 50, pp. 259 -263.         [ Links ]

[5] Lee, H., Padmanabhan, V. and Whang S. (1997a). The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38, pp. 93.         [ Links ]

[6] Sterman, J. (1989). Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment, Management Science, Vol. 35, pp. 321-339.         [ Links ]

[7] Croson, R., and Donohue K. (2003). Impact of Pos Data Sharing on Supply Chain Management: An Experimental Study, Management Science, Vol. 12, pp. 1-11.         [ Links ]

[8] Croson, R., Donohue, K. Katok, E. and Sterman, J. (2004). Order Stability in Supply Chains: Coordination Risk and the Role of Coordination Stock, MIT Sloan Working Paper 4513-04: 32. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management.         [ Links ]

[9] Cachon, G. (1999). Managing Supply Chain Demand Variability with Scheduled Ordering Policies, Management Science, Vol. 45, pp. 843-856.         [ Links ]

[10] Blinder, A. (1981). Retail inventory investment and business fluctuation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Vol. 2. pp. 443-505.         [ Links ]

[11] Caplin, A. (1985). The Variability of Aggregate Demand with (S,S) Inventory Policies, Econometrica, Vol. 53, pp. 1395-1410.         [ Links ]

[12] Baganha, M., and Cohen, M. A. (1998). The Stabilizing Effect of Distribution Center Inventory, Operations Research, Vol. 46, pp. 572-583.         [ Links ]

[13] Schmidt, G. Cachon, G. and Randall, T. (2007). In Search Of The Bullwhip Effect. Manufacturing And Service Operations Management.         [ Links ]

[14] Blinder, A. Lovell, M.C. and Summers L.H. (1981). Retail inventory behavior and business fluctuation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Vol. 2, pp. 443-520.         [ Links ]

[15] Chatfield, D., Kim, J., Harrison, T. and Hayya, J. (2004). The Bullwhip Effect-Impact of Stochastic.         [ Links ]

[16] Warburton, R. (2004). An Analytical Investigation of the Bullwhip Effect. Production and Operations Management Society. Vol. 13, No. 2, 2004, pp. 150-160.         [ Links ]

[17] Kleijnen, J., and Smits, M. (2003). Performance Metrics in Supply Chain Management, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 54, pp. 507.         [ Links ]

[18] Sheret, M. (1984). The coefficient of variation: Weighting Considerations, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 289-295.         [ Links ]

[19] Monsreal, M., Royo, J. and Lambán, M. (Unpublished). Order Variability: A Two Component Decomposition and a New Variability Measure.         [ Links ]

[20] Abel, A. (1985). Inventories, stock-outs and production smoothing. Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 52, pp. 283-93.         [ Links ]

[21] Blanchard, O. (1983). The Production and Inventory Behavior of the American Automobile Industry, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 91, pp. 365-400.         [ Links ]

[22] Blinder, A. S., (1986). Can the Production Smoothing Model of Inventory Behavior Be Saved?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 101, pp. 431-454.         [ Links ]

[23] Blinder, A. and Maccini, L. (1991). Taking Stock: A Critical Assessment of Recent Research on Inventories, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, pp. 73-96.         [ Links ]

[24] Cachon, G. (1999). Managing Supply Chain Demand Variability with Scheduled Ordering Policies, Management Science, Vol. 45, pp. 843-856.         [ Links ]

[25] Chen, A., Hsu, C.H. and Blue, J. (2007). Demand planning approaches to aggregating and forecasting interrelated for safety stock and backup capacity planning. International journal of production Research, Vol. 45, pp. 2269-2294.         [ Links ]

[26] Chen, F., Z. Drezner, J.K. Ryan, and D. Simchi Levi. (2000). Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information, Management Science, Vol. 46, pp. 436.         [ Links ]

[27] Chiang, G. and Feng, Y. (2007). The value of information sharing in the presence of supply uncertainty and demand volatility. International journal of production Research, Vol. 45, pp. 1429-1447.         [ Links ]

[28] Coppini, M., Rossignoli, C., Rossi, T. and Strozzi, F. (2010). Bullwhip effect inventory oscillations analysis using the beer game model. International journal of production Research, Vol. 48, pp. 3943-3956.         [ Links ]

[29] De Sensi, G., Longo, F. and Mirabelli, G. (2008). Inventory polices analysis under demand patterns and lead times constraints in real supply chain. International journal of production Research, Vol. 46, pp. 6997-7016.         [ Links ]

[30] Eichenbaum, M. (1989). Some empirical evidence on the production level and production cost smoothing models of inventory management. American Economic Review, Vol. 79, pp. 853-64.         [ Links ]

[31] Ghali, M. (1987). Seasonality, aggregation and the testing of the production-smoothing hypothesis. American Economic Review, Vol. 77, pp. 464-9.         [ Links ]

[32] Kahn, J. A. (1987). Inventories and the Volatility of Production, American Economic Review, Vol. 77, pp. 667-679.         [ Links ]

[33] Krane, S. and Braun. S. (1991). Production Smoothing Evidence from Physical -Product Data, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, pp. 558-581.         [ Links ]

[34] Lai. Richard K. (2005). Bullwhip in a Spanish Shop. Harvard NOM, Working Paper No. 06-06.         [ Links ]

[35] Lee, H., Padmanabhan, V. and Whang S.Information (1997b). Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect, Management Science, Vol. 50, pp. 1887.         [ Links ]

[36] Pereira, J., Takahashi, K., Ahumada, L. and Paredes, F. (2009). Flexibility dimensions to control the bullwhip effect in supply chain. International journal of production Research, Vol. 47, pp. 6357-6374.         [ Links ]

[37] Ramey, V. (1991). Nonconvex costs and the behavior of inventories. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, pp. 306-34.         [ Links ]

[38] Selcuk, B., Adan, I., De Kok, T. and Fransoo, J. (2009). An explicit analysis of the lead time syndrome: stability condition and performance evaluation. International journal of production Research, Vol. 47, pp. 2507-2529.         [ Links ]

[39] Wangphanich, S., Kara, S. and Kayis, B. (2010). Analysis of the bullwhip effect in multi-product, multistage supply chain system-a simulation approach. International journal of production Research, Vol. 48, pp. 4501-4517.         [ Links ]

[40] West, K. (1990). The Sources of Fluctuations in Aggregate Inventories and Gnp. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 105, pp. 939-971.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons