SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número40Peirce y una intervención posible en el debate sobre el carácter del contenido empíricoAnalogía y símbolo: conceptos clave para la articulación entre naturaleza y libertad en la Kritik der Urteilskraft de Kant índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Signos filosóficos

versión impresa ISSN 1665-1324

Resumen

PRIOR OLMOS, Ángel. Historiography, religion, and politics in the debate on totalitarianism. Sig. Fil [online]. 2018, vol.20, n.40, pp.60-87.  Epub 07-Mar-2022. ISSN 1665-1324.

The debate between Arendt and Voegelin is usually limited to the reception of The Origins of Totalitarianism and some allusions to human nature and the emotional aspect of Arendt’s way of proceeding, when it actually is a very significant discussion through which the author outlines important features of his thought, such as the methodological aspect of his work, the matter of the historical period where the origins of the totalitarian phenomenon can be inserted and the difference between doing it as immanentist heresy or totalitarian government, with the separation between religion and politics as different spheres of the existence.

Palabras llave : Arendt; Voegelin; immanentist heresy; modernity.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )