SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.84 número3Efecto del ejercicio cardiovascular en las mujeres con obesidad sobre las concentraciones de la adiponectina, leptina y factor de necrosis tumoral-alfaReceptor de rianodina, fuga de calcio y arritmias índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Archivos de cardiología de México

versión On-line ISSN 1665-1731versión impresa ISSN 1405-9940

Resumen

LANGE, Juan Manuel et al. Right ventricular septal stimulation would produce similar bi-ventricular dyssynchrony as does apical stimulation in patients with normal ejection fraction. Arch. Cardiol. Méx. [online]. 2014, vol.84, n.3, pp.183-190. ISSN 1665-1731.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acmx.2013.11.008.

Objective: To determine in patients with normal ejection fraction, undergoing permanent VVI pacing, if medial septal stimulation has lower dyssynchrony than apical stimulation assessed by echocardiography. Method: A prospective trial, 19 patients > 70 years old, scheduled for VVI pacemaker implantation for complete degenerative atrioventricular block, ventricular frequency < 50 beat per minute and ejection fraction ≥ 45%. Patients with atrial fibrillation, heart failure, left bundle branch block and QRS durations longer than 120 milliseconds in surface electrocardiogram with sinus rhythm were excluded. Patients were randomized to apical implantation group A: 47% and septal implantation group B: 53%. Echocardiographic parameters were measured previous to the implant, 48 h, 5 and 48 months after implantation. Results: No patients had diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy or heart failure. Echocardiographic parameters for interventricular dyssynchrony between groups were A: 14.44 ± 19.76 msec vs. B: 9 ± 36.45 msec; A: 6.11 ± 62.11 msec vs. B: 13 ± 38.31 msec; A: 77 ± 53.51 msec vs. B: 24.29 ± 80.90 msec, P = NS). For interventricular dyssynchrony were A: 46.44 ± 19.76 msec vs. B: 42.20 ± 29.56 msec; A: 45.33 ± 45.67 msec vs. B: 29.80 ± 44.66 msec; A: 46,38 ± 20 msec vs. B: 21 ± 27.20 msec, P = NS) at 48 h, 5 and 48 months, respectively. Conclusion: Apical site of stimulation does not increase ventricular dyssynchrony rate in patients with preserved ejection fraction. Septal stimulation showed decreased trend in interventricular dyssynchrony.

Palabras llave : Pacemaker; Cardiac resynchronization; Stimulation site; Ventricular resynchronization; Ventricular dyssynchrony; Argentina.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons