Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
Citado por SciELO
Accesos
Links relacionados
Similares en
SciELO
Compartir
Isonomía
versión impresa ISSN 1405-0218
Resumen
FAZIO, Federico De. Proportionality Test and Constitutional Social Rights Adjudication. Isonomía [online]. 2019, n.51, pp.95-115. Epub 07-Ago-2020. ISSN 1405-0218. https://doi.org/10.5347/isonomia.v0i51.229.
The aim of this article is to reconstruct in a rational way the use of the proportionality test in contexts of constitutional social rights adjudication. Such a reconstruction will be developed in two steps. Firstly, I will address the question as to whether proportionality test in its “by omission” version (i.e. used to apply positive rights) shows or not a different structure in comparison with its, much better known and investigated, “by excess” version (i.e., used to apply negative rights). Secondly, I will describe the rules and forms of reasoning that are implied in the use of proportionality test by omission and integrate, respectively, the sub-tests of suitability, necessity and proportionality stricto sensu. Finally, I will present a brief summary as a conclusion.
Palabras llave : proportionality test; constitutional social rights; theory of judicial adjudication.












