SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número52Reflexiones acerca de la acción recíproca y la unidad necesaria. Sobre la interpretación de E. Watkins del modelo causal Kantiano índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Tópicos (México)

versión impresa ISSN 0188-6649

Resumen

CAMACHO, Enrique. Nationalism and Crisis. Tópicos (México) [online]. 2017, n.52, pp.427-454. ISSN 0188-6649.  https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i52.836.

Nationalism seems a persistent ideology in academia as much as in politics; despite the fact that it has been shown that nationalism is deeply unjust for minorities. A case for national identity is often invoked to supplement liberalism regarding the inner difficulties that liberal theories have to explain their membership, assure stability and produce endorsement. So, it seems that national identity may also be required for justice. While this controversy continues, I argue that a different approach is available. We can define a conception of legitimacy independently from a conception of justice, and then ask what legitimacy requires from our national allegiances. If everything goes well, much of the controversy from justice disappears as we find that the case for cultural nationalism may be illegitimate for liberal democracies.

Palabras llave : nationalism; distributive justice; legitimacy; political self-determination; minority rights; majority rights.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )