SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 número3Consideraciones sobre el ARN de interferencia para el control de enfermedades fúngicas en cultivos agrícolas en México y América LatinaEscala diagramática para evaluar la severidad del moho gris (Botrytis cinerea) en el cultivo de granada índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de fitopatología

versión On-line ISSN 2007-8080versión impresa ISSN 0185-3309

Rev. mex. fitopatol vol.41 no.3 Texcoco sep. 2023  Epub 13-Oct-2023

https://doi.org/10.18781/r.mex.fit.2304-2 

Phytopathological notes

In vitro antagonism of Trichoderma against Rhizoctonia solani

Jesús Orlando Pérez-González1 

Sergio Gavino Ramírez-Rojas*  2 

Ramiro Rocha-Rodríguez3 

Katya Ornelas-Ocampo2 

Jorge Miguel Paulino Vázquez-Alvarado2 

Filogonio Jesús Hernández-Guzmán4 

Mariel Garduño-Audelo1 

1 Agricultura Sustentable y Protegida, Universidad Tecnológica del Sur del Estado de Morelos (UTSEM). Carr. Puente de Ixtla-Mazatepec km 2.35, CP 62665, Puente de Ixtla, Mor., México;

2 Programa de Sanidad Forestal y Agrícola, Campo Experimental “Zacatepec”, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Carr. Zacatepec-Galeana km 0.5, CP 62780, Zacatepec, Mor., México;

3 Campo Experimental “Bajío”, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Carr. Celaya-San Miguel Allende km 6.5, CP 38110, Celaya, Gto, México;

4 Universidad Politécnica de Francisco I. Madero. Tepatepec, CP 42660, Francisco I. Madero, Hidalgo, México;


Abstract.

Trichoderma spp., is a highly efficient antagonist of root pathogens, such as Rhizoctonia solani, which causes loss in many crops. The aim of this research was to evaluate in vitro the antagonistic capacity of T. viride, T. koningii, T. harzianum and Trichoderma spp. isolates against R. solani from a potato crop. In confrontation tests, all Trichoderma isolates were classified as antagonists class 2 according to Bell scale, where T. harzianum and T. koningii showed more than 60% inhibition of the radial growth of R. solani at 120 h. In the interaction between T. harzianum and Trichoderma spp. with R. solani, as mycoparasitism strategy, vacuolization, lysis, coiling, and penetration were demonstrated, the last two were present in all Trichoderma isolates evaluated.

Key words: Confrontation; mycoparasitism; biocontrol; biofungicide.

Resumen.

Trichoderma spp., es un antagonista muy eficiente de patógenos de las raíces de papa. Rhizoctonia solani, causa pérdidas en varios cultivos agrícolas. El objetivo de este trabajo, fue evaluar in vitro la capacidad antagónica de T. viridie; T. koningii; T. harzanium y Trichoderma spp. frente a R. solani proveniente de un cultivo de papa. En las pruebas de confrontación, todos los aislamientos de Trichoderma se ubicaron en la clase 2 de antagonismo de la escala de Bell, donde T. harzianum y T. koningii mostraron más de 60% de inhibición del crecimiento radial de R. solani a las 120 h. En la interacción de T. harzianum y Trichoderma spp. con R. solani, como estrategia de micoparasitismo, se observó vacuolización, lisis, enrollamiento y penetración; las dos últimas presentes en todos los aislados evaluados de Trichoderma.

Palabras clave: Confrontación; micoparasitismo; biocontrol; biofungicida.

Potato (Solanum tuberosum) is one of the main global crops, after sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum), corn (Zea mays), rice (Oryza sativa) and wheat (Triticum spp.) (FAO, 2016). Diseases affecting roots, tubers and leaves of the potato plant can prevent proper tuber formation. One of such disease is black scab, caused by the pathogen Rhizoctonia solani (Betancourth et al., 2021). This pathogen infects many wild and cultivated plants in Mexico (DGSV-CNRF, 2020).

To control R. solani, growers often apply synthetic fungicides such as Carbendazim, Copper phosphite and Thiabendazole (Alburqueque and Gusqui, 2018). Chemicals like Azoxystrobin and propiconazole also provide effective disease control (Khan and Bolton, 2010). However, chemical control is not recommended due to the high residue levels (Leadbeater and Gisi, 2010). Therefore, alternative methods to control R. solani have been explored, including biological control.

The antagonistic effect of some Trichoderma species on R. solani was first described in 1932 (Weindling, 1932). Today, Trichoderma is used to protect plants from root pathogens like R. solani, and to stimulate plant defense mechanisms (Korolev et al., 2008). Trichoderma can parasitize and eliminate a wide range of fungal plant pathogens (Romero-Arenas et al., 2017). Its agricultural success and use stems from its diverse mechanisms of action (Infante and Martínez, 2019).

The agricultural utilization of Trichoderma species represents a promising technological approach for producing high-quality biofungicides (Hernández-Mendoza et al., 2012; Companioni et al., 2019). Despite its considerable potential, the application of Trichoderma based solutions for disease management in potatoes remains limited in Mexico, and challenges associated with addressing Rhizoctonia solani infections persist. Thus, the primary aim of this study was to conduct an in vitro assessment of the efficacy of four distinct Trichoderma species as potential biofungicides targeting Rhizoctonia solani.

In this research, isolates of T. viride (Tv), T. koningii (Tk), T. harzianum (Th), and Trichoderma spp. (Tspp.) employed, isolates were obtained from the collection maintained by the Universidad Tecnológica del Sur in Morelos. Concurrently, the R. solani strain was procured from the Zacatepec Experimental Station of the National Institute of Forestry, Agriculture, and Livestock Research (INIFAP). The isolation of R. solani involved obtaining samples from infected potato plants of Fiana variety from Toluca, Mexico state. Subsequent to carefully rinsing the plants to eliminate soil residues through flowing water, symptomatic one squared centimeter sections from various plant segments were disinfected utilizing 3% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min., followed by rinsing with sterile distilled water. These sections were plated on Petri dishes with Sabouraud dextrose agar culture medium (MCD LAB) and subjected to an incubation period of 25 ± 2 °C for 48 hrs. Establishment of pure cultures were achieved by inoculating Petri dishes with hyphal tips possessing characteristics and morphology indicative of R. solani. Both Trichoderma species and R. solani isolates described in this study are currently undergoing molecular identification procedures.

For evaluations, fungi were cultivated on Sabouraud dextrose agar medium at controlled temperature of 25 ± 2 °C for 96 hrs (Trichoderma species) and for 10 days (R. solani).

Competition for resources between Trichoderma species and R. solani were evaluated using the dual confrontation method as outlined by Bell et al. (1982) and detailed by Martínez and Solano (1994). Evaluation were conducted in 90 mm diameter Petri dishes containing Sabouraud dextrose agar medium. Individual 5 mm agar disks harboring mycelium of Tv, Tk, Th, and Tspp. were positioned one centimeter from the edge of each Petri dish (replicate), with a 5 mm disk of R. solani growth positioned at the opposing end. In parallel, a control experiment featuring R. solani growth without of Trichoderma species were conducted employing a completely randomized design, five treatments, with five replicates (Petri dishes), were evaluated. Radial growth measurements during confrontations were taken at 24-hr intervals, up to 120 hrs, within a controlled environment of 25 ± 2 ºC.

Classification of Tv, Tk, Th, and Tspp. isolates as antagonists against R. solani was executed using the five class scale introduced by Bell et al. (1982). Percentage Inhibition of Radial Growth Rate (PIRGR) was calculated using the formula PIRGR = (R1 - R2) / R1 x 100, where R1 represents the radial growth of the phytopathogen colony within the control treatment, and R2 signifies the radial growth of the pathogenic isolate when confronted by the antagonist (Rahman et al., 2009). Statistical analysis of PIRGR data were performed employing IBM SPSS® Statistics for Windows version 25 (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York, USA). Prior to analysis, normality and homogeneity of variance were assessed using the Levene and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. Subsequently, an analysis of variance and Tukey’s mean comparison test (p ≤ 0.01) was executed.

Mycoparasitism was observed in the contact zone between the two fungi (antagonist pathogen), and the array of hyphal interactions; rolling, penetration, vacuolization, and lysis were assessed in accordance with the methodology outlined by Chet et al. (1981). To conduct this analysis, adhesive tape was utilized to obtain samples from the interaction zone, which were subsequently mounted on slides with a drop of lactophenol blue. Examination of samples were carried out under an optical microscope (LABOMED, model CXL TRINOCULAR 9135007) at 40X magnification. Each replicate (Petri dish) encompassed three distinct preparations.

The four Trichoderma isolates subjected to evaluation were classified within antagonism class 2 of the scale established by Bell et al. (1982) (Figure 1). Their growth encompassed more than 60% of the surface area occupied by R. solani. By applying the same scale, in vitro assessments conducted by Pérez et al. (2020) demonstrated that T. atroviride, T. konigiopsis, and T. harzianum exhibited an overgrowth exceeding 85% over R. solani, warranting their classification within antagonism class 1. Likewise, when assayed against Botrytis sp., strains of T. koningii, T. atroviride, T. inhamatum, and T. harzianum were classified as belonging to class 1 (Acosta et al., 2021), a classification shared by T. asperellum and Trichoderma spp. in relation to B. cinerea (Pincay et al., 2021).

Figure 1 Confrontation of Trichoderma isolates with R. solani were carried out on Sabouraud agar, followed by the assessment of R. solani’s radial growth inhibition at 24 hr intervals. The used abbreviations were as follows: Tspp. (Trichoderma spp.), Th (T. harzianum), Tv (T. viride), Tk (T. koningii), with the control group represented by R. solani. 

The antagonistic interaction between fungi is mediated through an intricate network of attack and counter-response mechanisms. Within the arsenal of attack strategies employed by Trichoderma species, a diverse array is noteworthy, including parasitism, antibiosis, competition for resources and space, enzymatic disruption of other microorganisms metabolisms, elicitation of defense responses, and facilitation of germination and growth (Morales-Mora et al., 2020).

All treatments exhibited an antagonistic effect exceeding 50% after 96 hrs, as indicated in Table 1. Growth of R. solani colony displayed noticeable changes, as illustrated in Figure 1. At 120 hrs, Tk, Th, and Tspp., treatments showed the most substantial inhibition percentages. Notably, all three treatments exhibited statistically significant differences in their mean values (p ≤ 0.01). Furthermore, data revealed that after 72 hrs, treatments demonstrated an increased growth rate. This phenomenon could be attributed to potential metabolites released by R. solani, as detailed in Table 1.

Table 1 Radial Growth Inhibition (RIGI) of Trichoderma on R. solani. 

Treatments 24 h 48 h 72 h 96 h 120 h
Tspp. 17.8 c 26.2 c 32.7 c 55.1 c 65.5 c
Th 22.2 b 27.9 b 36.3 b 57.3 b 66.7 b
Tv 11.1 d 20.5 d 29.8 d 50.4 d 57.0 d
Tk 24.4 a 31.2 a 43.3 a 61.2 a 67.5 a
Es χ 1.31* 1.0* 1.3* 1.0* 1.08*
CV (%) 27.76 15.12 14.66 7.17 6.74

Tspp. = Trichoderma spp; Th = T. harzianum; Tv = T. viride; Tk = T. koningii; Es χ = standard error of the mean; CV = coefficient of variation. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.01).

Other in vitro assessments, Trichoderma spp. exhibited inhibition rates exceeding 50% against Trichothecium sp., Cladosporium sp., and Fusarium sp.; meanwhile, it demonstrated a remarkable 75% inhibition against Didymella bryoniae (Martínez et al., 2013). Using the native strain TC05 of Trichoderma spp., both under in vitro conditions and within a mesh house, revealed a substantial antagonistic potential against Fusarium spp. (Rodríguez-Pinto et al., 2021). Elucidation of underlying mechanisms of action exhibited by these antagonist isolates in vitro forms the foundation for their selection. This selection process pertains not only to subsequent assessments under semi-controlled and field conditions but also guides the formulation of production strategies aimed at achieving enhanced stability and efficacy in field results.

Figure 2, shows the confrontation zone between Th and R. solani, where similar to Tspp., four distinct types of hyphal interactions were observed, encompassing coiling, penetration, vacuolization, and lysis of hyphae. Meanwhile, Tv and Tk exhibited two and three types of interactions, respectively. On the other hand, coiling and hyphal penetration emerged as the predominant mycoparasitic strategies employed by all evaluated Trichoderma isolates (Table 2). Literature has documented that the amalgamation of diverse mycoparasitic tactics contributes to a more effective biocontrol action against phytopathogens (Companioni et al., 2019).

Figure 2 Mechanisms of antagonistic action of T. harzianum on R. solani: coiling (A), penetration (B), vacuolization (C) and lysis (D). 

Table 2 Types of hyphal interaction between Trichoderma isolates and R. solani. 

Treatments Hyphal interaction type
Trichoderma spp. (Tspp.) E-P-L-V
T. harzanium (Th) E-P-L-V
T. viridie (Tv) E-P
T. koningii (Tk) E-P-L

Coiling (E), Penetration (P), vacuolization (V) and Lysis (L).

Trichoderma species produce enzymes, including ß-1,3-glucanases, ß-1,6-glucanases, chitinases, and proteases, capable of breaking down cell walls of various fungi (Ait-Lahsen et al., 2001). In this process, Trichoderma species hyphae exhibit chemotropic growth towards the host. When in close proximity to the pathogen, their attachment and coiling initiate, ultimately leading to lytic activity.

Results from dual confrontation of T. harzianum and T. koningii with R. solani revealed significant radial growth inhibition rates. Correspondingly, both T. harzianum and Trichoderma spp. displayed four distinct types of hyphal interactions with the pathogen. Furthermore, all assessed species were categorized under class 2 on the Bell et al. scale (1982).

While all Trichoderma isolates exhibited comparable levels of antagonism against R. solani, exploring in vitro interactions with diverse R. solani strains, varying phytopathogenic fungi, and the original crop environments could aid in selecting Trichoderma species showcasing optimal parasitic and control characteristics.

Cited literature

Acosta LT, Azania KD and Azania R. 2021. Cultivo dual in vitro de cepas nativas de Trichoderma spp. frente a Botrytis spp. patógeno de Passiflora ligularis Juss. Agropecuaria Science and Biotechnology 1: 43-55. http://revistas.untrm.edu.pe/index.php/RIAGROP/article/view/720/1022. [ Links ]

Ait-Lahsen H, Soler A, Rey M, De La Cruz J, Monte E and Llobell A. 2001. An antifungal exo-alpha-1,3-glucanase (AGN13.1) from the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67: 5833-5839. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.12.5833-5839.2001. [ Links ]

Alburqueque DA y Gusqui RM. 2018. Eficacia de fungicidas químicos para el control in vitro de diferentes fitopatógenos en condiciones controladas. Arnaldoa 25: 489-498. http://doi.org/10.22497/arnaldoa.252.25209. [ Links ]

Bell DK, Wells HD and Markham CR. 1982. In vitro antagonism of Trichoderma spp. against six fungal pathogens. Phytopathology 72: 379-382. https://www.apsnet.org/publications/phytopathology/backissues/Documents/1982Articles/Phyto72n04_379. PDF. [ Links ]

Betancourth CA, Sañudo BA, Flórez CA y Salazar CE. 2021. Manejo de la costra negra de la papa (Rhizoctonia solani) con el establecimiento de abonos verdes. Información Tecnológica 32: 165-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642021000200165. [ Links ]

Chet I, Harman GE and Baker R. 1981. Trichoderma hamatum: its hyphal interactions with Rhizoctonia solani and Pythium spp. Microbial Ecology 7: 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010476. [ Links ]

Companioni GB, Domínguez AG y García VR. 2019. Trichoderma: su potencial en el desarrollo sostenible de la agricultura. Biotecnología Vegetal 19: 237-248. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/bvg/v19n4/2074-8647-bvg-19-04-237.pdf. [ Links ]

DGSV-CNRF. 2020. Dirección General de Sanidad Vegetal-Centro Nacional de Referencia Fitosanitaria. Pudrición de la raíz, Rhizoctonia solani. Sader-Senasica. Ficha técnica. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/600968/Pudrición de la raíz.pdf. [ Links ]

FAO, Organización de la Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. 2016. Producción agrícola, Hortalizas. https://bit.ly/2L1KZxh (consulta, octubre 2021). [ Links ]

Hernández-Mendoza JL, Quiroz-Velázquez JD, Díaz-Franco A, García-Olivares JG, Bustamante-Dávila AJ and Gill-Langarica HR. 2012. Detection of metabolites in Flor de Mayo common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and their response to inoculation with Trichoderma harzianum. African Journal of Biotechnology 11: 11767-11771. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/view/129007. [ Links ]

Infante MD y Martínez CB. 2019. Actividad antagónica de Trichoderma asperellum Samuels, Lieckfeldt & Nirenberg sobre aislados de diferentes grupos anastomósicos de Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. Revista de Protección Vegetal 34: 1-7. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1010-27522019000200008.Links ]

Khan MFR and Bolton M. 2010. Management of Rhizoctonia root and crown rot of sugar beet. Plant Disease Management NDSU extension service. North Dakota State University. https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/publications/crops/management-of-rhizoctonia-root-and-crown-rot-of-sugar-beets. [ Links ]

Korolev N, Rav DD and Elad Y. 2008. The role of phytohormones in basal resistance and Trichoderma-induced systemic resistance to Botrytis cinerea in Arabidopsis thaliana. BioControl 53: 667-683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-007-9103-3. [ Links ]

Leadbeater A and Gisi U. 2010. The challenges of chemical control of plant diseases. In: Gisi U, Chet I, Gullino ML (eds.) Recent developments in management of plant diseases. Dordrecht: Springer. 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8804-9_1. [ Links ]

Martínez B, Pérez J, Infante D, Duarte Y y Moreno M. 2013. Antagonismo de aislamientos de Trichoderma spp. frente a Didymella bryoniae (Fuckel) Rehm. Protección Vegetal 28: 192-198. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/rpv/v28n3/rpv05313.pdf. [ Links ]

Martínez B. y Solano T. 1994. Antagonismo de Trichoderma spp. frente a Alternaria solani (Ellis y Martin) Jones y Grout. Protección Vegetal.10:221-225. [ Links ]

Morales-Mora LA, Andrade-Hoyos P, Valencia-de Ita MA, Romero-Arenas O, Silva-Rojas HV y Contreras-Paredes CA. 2020. Caracterización de hongos asociados al cultivo de fresa y efecto antagonista in vitro de Trichoderma harzianum. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 38: 434-449. https://doi.org/10.18781/r.mex.fit.2005-7. [ Links ]

Pérez AA, Pérez MA, Martínez CB, Rollhaiser IN y Blengini MC. 2020. Selección de aislamientos de Trichoderma spp. in vitro como potenciales biofungicidas para el control de Rhizoctonia solani Kühnen la papa. Agriscientia 37: 21-33. https://doi.org/10.31047/1668.298x.v37.n2.29419. [ Links ]

Pincay A, Noboa M, Viera W, Herrera K, León A y Jackson T. 2021. Evaluación in vitro del potencial antagonista de Trichoderma spp. y hongos endófitos de mora (Rubus glaucus Benth) para el control de Botrytis cinerea. Journal of Science and Research: Revista Ciencia e Investigación 6: 109-124. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8023668. [ Links ]

Rahman MA, Begum MF and Alam MF. (2009). Screening of Trichoderma isolates as a biological control agent against Ceratocystis paradoxa causing pineapple disease of sugarcane. Mycobiology 37(4): 277-285. https://doi.org/10.4489/MYCO.2009.37.4.277. [ Links ]

Rodríguez-Pinto ML, Campo-Arana RO, Cardona-Ayala CE, Manjarres-Cogollo EE y Rossi-Tordecilla BJ. 2021. Trichoderma spp. biocontrolador de marchitez vascular (Fusarium spp.) de la berenjena en el Caribe colombiano. Biotecnología en el Sector Agropecuario y Agroindustrial 19:158-169. https://doi.org/10.18684/bsaa.v19.n2.2021.1847. [ Links ]

Romero-Arenas O, Amaro JL, Damián MA, Valencia de Ita MA, Rivera A y Huerta M. 2017. Bio-preparados de Trichoderma spp. para el control biológico de Phytophthora capsici en el cultivo de tomate de Puebla, México. ITEA 113: 313-324. http://doi.org/10.12706/itea.2017.019. [ Links ]

Weindling R. 1932. Trichoderma lignorum as a parasite of other soil fungi. Phytopathology 22: 837-845. https://eurekamag.com/research/013/594/013594922.php. [ Links ]

Received: April 16, 2023; Accepted: August 18, 2023

* Corresponding author: sergioinifap@yahoo.com.mx

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License