SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.38 número2Identificación de hongos asociados a las enfermedades de Cereus jamacaru y Cereus hildmannianusAislamiento e identificación de patógenos causantes de la pudrición del tallo de la higuera (Ficus carica) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de fitopatología

versión On-line ISSN 2007-8080versión impresa ISSN 0185-3309

Rev. mex. fitopatol vol.38 no.2 Texcoco may. 2020  Epub 27-Nov-2020

https://doi.org/10.18781/r.mex.fit.2002-1 

Phytopathological notes

Fungicides, biocontrollers and resistance inducers in commercial bell pepper hybrids inoculated with Phytophthora capsici

Rafael Godínez-Paoli1 

Santos Gerardo Leyva-Mir2 

María del Rosario García-Mateos1 

Jesús Magdaleno-Villar1 

Oscar Cruz-Alvarez3 

María Teresa Martínez-Damián1  * 

1 Instituto de Horticultura, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Carretera México-Texcoco, Km 38.5, Texcoco, Estado de México, CP 56230, México;

2 Micología Agrícola, Departamento de Parasitología Agrícola, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Carretera México-Texcoco, Km 38.5, Texcoco, Estado de México, CP 56230, México;

3 Facultad de Ciencias Agrotecnológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Avenida Pascual Orozco, Campus 1, s/n, Chihuahua, Chihuahua, CP 31350, México.


Abstract.

The aim of this research was to evaluate the resistance level of different commercial bell peppers hybrids (Caoba rojo, Dicaprio amarillo, Pimiento Olvera, Sympathy, California wonder y PS16364212), to P. capsici by using fungicides, biocontrollers and inducers of resistance. The essay was carried out under greenhouse conditions in black polyethylene bags with tezontle sand as substrate. The products were applied according to the manufacturer’s recommended dose, applied 10 and 20 days after transplantation. Subsequently, the plants were inoculated with a solution of mobile zoospores at a concentration of 1x10-6. Three visual evaluations were carried out to record incidence, severity and AUDSC. It was found that PS16364212 presented better resistance to P. capsici attack with 14.9% incidence and 15.7% day-1 (AUDSC) compared to California wonder (44.2% incidence). The application of Metalaxil-M and Acibenzolar-S-methyl showed the lowest AUDSC (0.8 and 6.8% dia-1, respectively), so that both products can be considered as an alternative for their use within the integrated management of wilt of the chili.

Key words: Capsicum annuum; oomycetes; wilting; Acibenzolar-S-methyl; defense activator; systemic resistance

Resumen.

El objetivo de esta investigación fue evaluar el nivel de resistencia de diferentes híbridos comerciales de pimiento morrón (Caoba rojo, Dicaprio amarillo, Pimiento Olvera, Sympathy, California wonder y PS16364212), a P. capsici mediante el uso de fungicidas, biocontroladores e inductores de resistencia. El ensayo se realizó bajo condiciones de invernadero en bolsas de polietileno negro con arena de tezontle como sustrato. Los productos se aplicaron de acuerdo con la dosis recomendada por el fabricante, aplicándose a los 10 y 20 días después del trasplante. Posteriormente, las plantas se inocularon con una solución de zoosporas móviles a una concentración de 1x10-6. Se realizaron tres evaluaciones visuales para el registro de incidencia, severidad y ABCPE. Se encontró que PS16364212 presentó mejor resistencia al ataque de P. capsici con 14.9% de incidencia y 15.7% dia-1 (ABCPE) respecto a California wonder (44.2% de incidencia). La aplicación de Metalaxil-M y Acibenzolar-S-metil mostraron la menor ABCPE (0.8 y 6.8% dia-1, respectivamente), por lo que ambos productos pueden ser considerados como una alternativa para su empleo dentro del manejo integrado de la marchitez del chile.

Palabras clave: Capsicum annuum; oomicetes; marchitez; Acibenzolar-S-metil; activador de defensa; resistencia sistémica

Capsicum annuum is one of the pepper species with the highest morphological diversity and surface planted on a global scale. In Mexico, they are planted under open field conditions and in greenhouses, in which the “jalapeño”, “bell pepper” y “poblano” types stand out, since the production volume amounts to 3,296,875 t, and the states with the highest production levels are Chihuahua, Sinaloa, Zacatecas and San Luis Potosí (SIAP, 2018). Mexico is the main exporter of bell peppers, with 150,303 t, and the main importing countries are the United States, Canada and Japan (Sánchez-Gurrola et al., 2019). However, the production of chili peppers, and not just bell peppers, are affected by the presence of the Oomycete Phytophthora capsici in the soil (Barchenger et al., 2018).

The pathogen P. capsici causes the wilting or drying of peppers, produced by the rotting of the root, chlorosis and falling of leaves, affecting between 10 and 100% of all plants (Jiménez-Camargo et al., 2018), which depends on the prevailing weather conditions and the timely application of fungicides that help inhibit the fungal reproductive cycle; notwithstanding, the constant use of chemical products has led to the resistance of the pathogen, as well as environmental deterioration (soil, water and air) and an increase in production costs (Fernández-Herrera et al., 2007).

Among the strategies used to reduce the negative effect of P. capsici, is the use of resistant rootstock; however, its use is limited by the type of rootstock, edaphoclimatic conditions and the species or variety used as a graft (Sánchez-Chávez et al., 2015). In this sense, the most practical and useful thing is the use of the pre-existing physical (waxes, cuticles, cell walls, size, shape and location of natural apertures, among others) and chemical defense mechanisms (ethylene, jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and essential nutrients) (Huallanca and Cadenas, 2014), as well as the induction of defense mechanisms that are activated before and after the penetration of the pathogen (Qi et al., 2012), providing a better response by the plant to a later attack (Castro et al., 2012).

Nowadays, products from natural or synthetic sources (biocontrollers) and resistance inducers (synthetic) are available in the market, and with their application on the plant, they act on it and stop or delay the entrance of the pathogen, limiting its activity on the infected tissue or organ, without having a direct effect or specific activity on the phytopathogens (Huallanca and Cadenas, 2014). Therefore, the aim of this research was to evaluate the level of resistance of different commercial bell pepper hybrids to P. capsici with the use of fungicides, biocontrollers and resistance inductors.

The experiment was set up in a tunnel-like greenhouse, P-5, located in the Experimental Agricultural Field in the Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACh), State of Mexico, Mexico (19° 29’ 33’’ N, 98° 52’ 21” W), at an altitude and with an annual average temperature of 2,267 masl and 15.9 °C, respectively. The plant material used consisted of commercial bell pepper hybrids: Caoba rojo, Dicaprio amarillo, Olvera pepper, Sympathy, California Wonder and PS16364212. On the other hand, the commercial name, active ingredient and doses of fungicides, biocontrollers and resistance inductors are described in Table 1.

The plants were sown in expanded polystyrene trays with 128 pits, using peat moss and perlite (1:2) as a substrate. The essay was carried out under greenhouse conditions, using 384, 60-day old seedlings, which were grafted in black polyethylene bags, with a capacity of 10 L, filled with tezontle sand as a substrate. Nutrition was carried out by a drip irrigation system, the nutrient solution of which had a nutritional composition of (mg L-1): N (250), P (60), Ca (250), K (250), Mg (60), S (205), Fe (3), Mn (1), B (0.5), Cu (0.1) and Zn (0.5), where the volume of applied irrigation was of one liter per plant per day, distributed in two irrigations (morning and afternoon) with a duration of 30 minutes.

An experimental design of plots divided with a factorial 6 x 8 factorial treatments was used, and for this we considered 1) six commercial hybrids (Caoba rojo, Dicaprio amarillo, Pimiento Olvera, Sympathy, California wonder and PS16364212), 2) eight treatments (Acibenzolar methyl (ASM) + inoculation, Bacillus subtilis (BS) + inoculation, distilled water (TEST) + inoculation, Metalaxil-M (METM) + inoculation, Trichoderma spp. (TRICH) + inoculation, Potassium phosphonate (FP) + inoculation, Fosetyl-Al (FAL) + inoculation and distilled water (TESTAB) without inoculating). The experimental unit was composed of a plant with eight repetitions per treatment. The products were applied according to the dosage indicated by the manufacturer (Table 1), which considered a density of 2.5 plants m-2. Treatments were applied 10 and 20 days after transplant, respectively. With exception from Actigard 50 GS and Aliette, the remaining products were applied by injecting directly into the substrate (stem base area). Plants were inoculated with 50 mL of a solution of mobile zoospores at a concentration of 1x106.

Table 1. Commercial name, active ingredient and applied doses of the products used for the control of P. capsici in bell peppers. 

Nombre comercial Ingrediente activo Dosis ha-1
Actigard 50 GSx S-metilbenzo [1,2,3]tiadiazol-7-carbotioato 50 g
Fitoprónx Anhídrido fosfórico, óxido de potasio y fosfonato potásico 2 L
Serenade ASOy Bacillus subtilis cepa QAT 713 1.5 kg
Espectro Trico-Bioy Trichoderma spp. 2 L
Ridomil Gold 480 SLz Metil N-(metotoxiacetil)-N-(2,6-xilil)-D-alaninato 0.5 L (1ª aplicación)
1.25 L (2a aplicación)
Aliettez Tris-O-etil fosfonato de aluminio. 2.5 kg
Testigo sin tratamiento Agua destilada 2 L
Testigo absoluto sin inocular Agua destilada 2 L

xResistance inductor, yBiocontrollerr and zChemical fungicide.

In this experiment, we used the 6143 P. capsici strain, which was provided by the Plant Health-Pathology area of the Colegio de Postgraduados-Campus Montecillo, which was replanted in a V8 juice-agar medium. Once the pathogen developed, its multiplication was carried out by planting 0.5x0.5 cm squares in Petri dishes with a V8 juice-agar culture medium, and letting it stand for 24h at room temperature (19 °C), followed by incubation at 28 °C for six days.

Out of the total of experimental units, 336 were inoculated with 50 mL of a solution of mobile zoospores, at a concentration of 1x106 zoospores mL-1. Samples were taken at random from the roots of 10 plants with typical symptoms of chili wilting, which were washed with running water and disinfested with a 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for five minutes, to later be placed in the V8 juice-agar culture medium (Singlenton et al., 1992).

The samples that developed isolations consisting of cottonlike white mycelia, were morphologically characterized. After corroborating the presence of the oomycete in the analyzed samples, the method was repeated to obtain sporangia. Subsequently, 50 mL of a solution of zoospores were prepared, at a concentration of 1x106 zoospores mL-1, and directly applied on the roots of 10 Caoba rojo, hybrid plants, 60 days to transplant, in order to satisfy Koch’s postulates; two trasplanting plants were used as controls.

Visual evaluations were carried out 8, 16 and 24 days after inoculation (dai) in order to detect plants with symptoms of wilting or dryness. The evaluation of incidence was carried out by identifying plants with typical symptoms of the disease in comparison with the total number of plants, and for the percentage of damage presented for each plant, a visual scale was proposed (Figure 1).

Using the data obtained on the damage levels, we calculated the severity of the attack of the oomycite, and the Area Under the Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) was determined, using the trapezoidal research method proposed by Shaner and Finney (1977). The data underwent an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a Tukey-Kramer multiple range test of comparison of averages (p≤0.05), using the SAS® 9.0 statistical package.

According to Koch’s test, all plants inoculated with the P. capsici zoospore solution presented a loss in turgency until their complete wilting, whereas the control, which only received distilled water, displayed no symptoms. Initial results displayed an incidence of 19.5% of P. capsici on the hybrids, increasing to 38.8 and 48.9%, respectively for the second and third evaluations (Table 2). In this sense, it has been reported that the attack of the oomycete begins with the segregation of proteins within the host, causing physiological alterations (Thines and Kamoun, 2010). During the evaluation, hybrid PS16364212 presented an incidence of 14.9% in comparison with California wonder, with 44.2%, and that has a longer time of use, and therefore has a lower resistance to the attack of the pathogen (Sánchez-Gurrola et al., 2019).

Plants inoculated with the B. subtilis treatment displayed a damage severity of 33.5%, regarding Metalaxil-M and Acibenzolar-S-Metil (0% in both cases). At the end of 16 dai, this value increased to 80.4%; by contrast, Metalaxil-M registered 0.4%. In the last evaluation (24 dai), an increase was observed in the severity for plants treated with B. subtilis (92.9%), which agrees with reports by Huallanca and Cadena (2014). In addition, a slight increase appeared in the severity after applying Metalaxil-M and Acibenzolar-S-Metil, with values of 0.8 and 7.0%, respectively (Cosme-Velázquez et al., 2015).

Figure 1 Visual guide for incidence evaluation and damage level (%) caused by P. capsici in bell pepper plants. 

The analysis of variance displayed highly significant effects on the hybrid x treatment interaction (p<0.0001) (data not shown). In general terms, the six hybrids displayed a lower AUDPC when they were given Acibenzolar-S-Metil (resistance inducer) and Metalaxil-M (fungicide) with values of 6.8 and 0.8% respectively, in relation to the TEST. Among the treatments, the use of Metalaxil-M displayed an AUDPC (Table 3), a behavior related to the systemic action of this fungicide, i.e., it interferes with the incorporation of uridine during the RNA synthesis process (Barchenger et al., 2018). Studies performed with Metalaxil-M have shown its efficiency in reducing the damage caused by the oomycete P. capsici (Fernández-Herrera et al., 2007); however, it is important to search for other alternatives of control, since the effectiveness of this fungicide has been affected by some cases of resistance to the oomycete (Qi et al., 2012).

Table 2. Incidence of wilting in bell pepper hybrids inoculated with P. capsici. 

Híbrido Días después de inoculación
8 16 24
Caoba rojo 2.2 dz 4.2 bc 5.3 ab
Dicaprio amarillo 2.5 cd 4.2 bc 4.8 bc
Pimiento Olvera 1.6 ab 4.1 ab 5.2 ab
Sympathy 1.9 d 4.4 b 6.3 a
California wonder 2.5 cd 5.0 ab 5.8 ab
PS16364212 1.1 e 1.4 de 2.0 d

z Equal letters in the columns indicate that there are no statistically significant differences according to Tukey-Kramer (p≤0.05).

The use of Acibenzolar-S-methyl presented no statistical differences with Metalaxyl-M and the TESTAB, since it displayed the lowest AUDPC among the treatments (Table 3). In this sense, Malolepsza (2006) reports that Acibenzolar-S-methyl acts in a similar way to salicylic acid, since it is composed of analogous molecules, where the former is highly related to the acquired systemic resistance, given its interaction with the activity of enzymes related to the manifestation of resistance in plants.

In regards to hybrids, the values of the AUDPC fluctuated between 15.7 and 100.8 (% day-1), where the most outstanding was PS16364212 (Table 3). This behavior may be linked to the synthesis of secondary metabolites with different chemical natures, including proteins and amino-acids, which help the plant create a level of resistance against the attack of P. capsici (Barchenger et al., 2018). In some circumstances, these defense mechanisms are activated by the compounds segregated by the pathogens in the plant when attacked (Sánchez-Chávez et al., 2015).

The activator of defenses Potassium phosphonate and the fungicide Fosetyl-Al displayed a similar growth in AUDPC (Table 4). In this sense, Huallanca and Cadenas (2014) indicate that Potassium phosphonate is a product with a limited efficiency in the control of P. capsici. The use of Fosetyl-Al has been reported to reduce the level of severity of the oomycete attack, although it does not surpass the use of Metalaxyl-M (Fernandez-Herrera et al., 2007), which, in this study, displayed an AUDPC of 0.5%. On the other hand, the use of biocontrollers (Trichoderma spp. and B. subtilis) created the greatest AUDPC, similar to what was observed in the TEST, therefore its effectiveness was minimal to suppress the oomycete, which agrees with reports by Huallanca and Cadena (2014).

Table 3. Area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for P. capsici in bell pepper plants treated with fungicides, biocontrollers and resistance inductors. 

Tratamiento ABCPE (% día-1)
Caoba rojo Dicaprio amarillo Pimiento Olvera Sympathy California wonder PS16364212
Acibenzolar-S-Metil 22.5 fgz 18.8 fg 0.0 g 0.0 g 0.0 g 0.0 g
B. subtilis 195.0 a 182.5 a 170.0 ab 173.8 ab 195.0 a 45.0 dg
Agua destilada 157.5 ab 195.0 a 170.0 ab 157.5 ac 170.0 ab 32.5 eg
Metalaxil-M 5.0 g 0.0 g 0.0 g 0.0 g 0.0 g 0.0 g
Trichoderma spp. 118.8 ae 126.3 ad 128.8 ad 157.5 ac 167.5 ab 28.8 eg
Fosfonato potásico 22.5 fg 43.8 dg 42.5 dg 87.5 bg 105.0 af 3.8 g
Fosetil-Al 60.0 dg 50.0 dg 42.5 dg 87.5 bg 68.8 cg 0.0 g
Agua destiladay 0.0 g 0.0 g 0.0 g 0.0 g 0.0 g 0.0 g

yWithout inoculation. zEqual letters in the columns indicate that there are no statistically significant differences according to Tukey-Kramer (p≤0.05).

With an AUDPC of 4.3%, the use of Acibenzolar-S-Methyl displayed a good control of the disease, although it did not improve on observations for Metalaxyl. In this regard, Cosme-Velázquez et al. (2015) point out that Acibenzolar-S-Methyl, is a reducer of systemic resistance, and therefore reduces the AUDPC significantly, but does not eliminate the infection. On the other hand, Baysal (2005) reports that the reduction of the damage caused by P. capsici is linked to the induction of the product with the creation and synthesis of enzymes, phenolic compounds and PR proteins, reported as responsible for the effectiveness of defense mechanisms in plants against the attack of pathogens.

In this research and the specific conditions of evaluation, the bell pepper hybrid PS16364212 displayed the best results for resistance to the attack of P. capsici. The use of Metalaxyl-M and Acibenzolar-S-methyl displayed an efficient control, as opposed to Potassium phosphonate, Fosetyl-Al and the biocontrollers (B. subtilis and Trichoderma spp.).

Table 4. Area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for P. capsici in hybrid bell pepper plants. 

Tratamiento ABCPE (% día-1)
Acibenzolar-S-Metil + inoculación 6.9 dz
Bacillus subtilis + inoculación 160.2 a
Testigo (agua destilada + inoculación) 146.9 ab
Metalaxil-M + inoculación 0.8 d
Trichoderma spp. + inoculación 121.3 b
Fosfonato potásico + inoculación 52.2 c
Fosetil-Al + inoculación 51.5 c
Agua destilada (TESTAB) 0.0 d

z Equal letters in the columns indicate that there are no statistically significant differences according to Tukey-Kramer (p≤0.05).

Literatura Citada

Barchenger, DW., Lamour, KH., and Bosland, PW. 2018. Challenges and strategies for breeding resistance in Capsicum annuum to the multifarious pathogen, Phytophthora capsici. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00628 [ Links ]

Baysal, O., Turgut, C., and Mao, G. 2005. Acibenzolar-S-methyl induced resistance to Phytophthora capsici in pepper leaves. Biología Plantarum 49 (4): 599-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-005-0055-0 [ Links ]

Castro, RA, Fernández, PSP. y Osuna, ÁP. 2012. Mecanismos de defensa del chile en el patosistema Capsicum annuum-Phytophthora capsici. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 30(1): 49-65. http://rmf.smf.org.mx/Contenido_Vol_30_1_2012.htmlLinks ]

Cosme-Velázquez, Y., Guzmán-Plazola, RA., Sandoval-Islas, S., Corona-Torres, T. y Mendoza-Pérez, D. 2015. Efecto del acibenzolar-S-metil en plantas de chile serrano (Capsicum annuum) infectadas con Phytophthora capsici en diferentes edades. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología, 33(2): 156-172. http://rmf.smf.org.mx/Vol3322015/AC/AC3.pdfLinks ]

Fernández-Herrera, E., Acosta-Ramos, M. y Pinto, VM. 2007. Efecto de aplicaciones de fungicidas sobre la incidencia de la marchitez (Phytophthora capsici Leo.) del jitomate (Lycopersicun esculentum Mill.) en invernadero. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 25(2): 186-189. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rmfi/v25n2/v25n2a14.pdfLinks ]

Huallanca, VCA. y Cadenas, GCA. 2014. Control de Phytophthora capsici Leonian en Capsicum annuum cv. Papri king con fungicidas, fertilizantes y biocontroladores. Anales Científicos 75 (1): 130-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.21704/ac.v75i1.94Links ]

Jiménez-Camargo, A., Valadez-Moctezuma, E. y Lozoya-Saldaña, H. 2018. Antagonismo de Penicillium sp. contra Phytophthora capsici Leonian. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 41(2). https://www.revistafitotecniamexicana.org/documentos/41-2/5a.pdfLinks ]

Malolepsza, U. 2006. Induction of disease resistance by acibenzolar-S-methyl and O-hydroxyethylorutin against Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants. Crop Protection 25: 956-962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.12.009Links ]

Qi, R., Wang, T., Zhao, W., Li, P., Ding, J., and Gao, Z. 2012. Activity of ten fungicides against Phytophthora capsici isolates resistant to metalaxyl. Journal of Phytopathology 160(11-12): 717-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12009Links ]

Sánchez-Chávez, E., Torres-González, A., Flores-Córdova, MA., Preciado-Rangel, P. y Márquez-Quiroz, C. 2015. Uso de portainjerto sobre el rendimiento, calidad del fruto y resistencia a Phytophthora capsici Leonian en pimiento morrón. Nova Scientia 7(15) 227-244. https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v7i15.302 [ Links ]

Sánchez-Gurrola, C., Gómez-Dorantes, N., Rodríguez-Alvarado, G., Fernández-Pavía, SP y Ávila-Quezada, G. 2019. Variabilidad morfológica y sensibilidad de Phytophthora capsici causando marchitez en chile pimiento morrón en Chihuahua, México. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 37(No. Esp. 1): 65-71. https://doi.org/10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.1904-4Links ]

SIAP. 2018. Atlas Agroalimentario 2012-2018. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y pecuaria (SIAP). Ciudad de México. 215 p. https://nube.siap.gob.mx/gobmx_publica- ciones_siap/pag/2018/Atlas-Agroalimentario-2018Links ]

Shaner, G. and Finney, RE. 1977. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow-mildewing resistance in Knox wheat. Phytopathology 67: 1051-1056. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-67-1051 [ Links ]

Singlenton, LL., Mihail, JD. and Rush, CM. 1992. Methods for research on soilborne phytopatogenic fungi. ALS press. Minesota, USA. 265 p. [ Links ]

Thines, M. and Kamoun, S. 2010. Oomycete-plant coevolution: recent advances and future prospects. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13: 427-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2010.04.001 Links ]

Received: February 04, 2020; Accepted: April 02, 2020

*Autor para correspondencia: teremd13@gmail.com

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons