Introduction
The ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) is one of six species of felids distributed in Mexico (Aranda 2005). The presence of this species in Mexico has been documented in areas ranging from semi-arid regions with xerophytic scrubs, dry tropical forests, to the coastal plains of the Pacific and Gulf of Mexico, including tropical rain forest, temperate and cloud forests, and mangroves in the Yucatan peninsula (Ahumada-Carrillo et al. 2013; Valdez-Jiménez et al. 2013; Aranda et al. 2014; Martínez-Calderas et al. 2011, 2015; Servín et al. 2016; Torres-Romero et al. 2017). Recent studies in America indicate that the ocelot is a species susceptible to habitat loss, leading to population fragmentation and isolation, producing a low gene flow that ultimately leads to genetic divergence, reduction in population size, and lower dispersal capacity (Janecka et al. 2014). For these reasons, it is considered that the current anthropogenic activities in the Sierra Madre Oriental (SMO) may be acting as major barriers restraining the connectivity of wild feline populations (Grigione et al. 2009; Villordo-Galván et al. 2010; Martínez-Calderas et al. 2011, 2015; Dueñas-López et al. 2015; Torres-Romero et al. 2017).
The Sierra Madre Oriental is considered an important biological corridor that maintains the connection between remnants of primary vegetation in eastern and southeastern Mexico, including those of the Sierra Negra in Oaxaca, Puebla, and Veracruz (Álvarez-Icaza 2013; Grigione et al. 2009; Dueñas-López et al. 2015). Suitable habitat patches have been found in this region, which can function as corridors for the survival and flow of different species of carnivores (Dueñas-López et al. 2015). However, the Sierra Madre Oriental and Sierra Negra in Puebla (SNP) are facing serious conservation problems such as land-use changes, fragmentation, and loss of vegetation cover, related to anthropic factors that could affect the presence of several felid species (Ortega-Huerta and Peterson 2008; Ramirez-Bravo et al. 2010; Villordo-Galván et al. 2010). In this sense, populations of jaguar, ocelot, cougar, jaguarundi, and their prey have been reported in regions of San Luis Potosi, which have survived given the presence of habitat patches in the region that provide coverage, food, and shelter for these species (Villordo-Galván et al. 2010; Martínez-Hernández et al. 2014; Dueñas-López et al. 2015; Hernández-Saint Marín et al. 2015).
In this regard , the generation of basic knowledge about the presence of the ocelot in an area (L. pardalis), a species related to landscapes with dense and broad forest coverage and little disturbance, may indicate a relatively low impact in such area and thus potential for its conservation or restoration (Aranda et al. 2014). For these reasons, its presence in areas with some degree of human disturbance will provide essential and useful information for the conservation of the species. An example of such areas is the southern Sierra Madre Oriental, a region that can be a biological corridor showing alterations in the landscape due to human impacts. Therefore, the objective of the present work was to record the presence of ocelot and predict, via an ecological niche modeling approach, the potential distribution of ocelot in the southern Sierra Madre Oriental and Sierra Negra in Puebla, seeking to identify and support priority sites for its conservation.
Materials and Methods
Study Area. The Sierra Madre Oriental is a mountain range spanning across 1,350 km with a width of at least 50 km and a maximum elevation of 2,500 m. This mountain complex stretches with a north-west-southeast direction, covering part of the Mexican states of Coahuila, Nuevo León, Tamaulipas, San Luis Potosi, Hidalgo, and north of Puebla (Ruiz-Jiménez et al. 2004). It encompasses a broad range of climatic conditions including warm, tropical, humid, temperate, and dry climates; with a mean total annual precipitation ranging from 139 to 3,377 mm (Hernández-Cerda and Carrasco-Anaya 2004). The structure of the landscape is heterogeneous, consisting of livestock and agriculture systems along with important vegetation types, including mountain cloud forests, seasonally dry tropical forests, temperate forests, humid tropical forests, and xeric scrublands. Of these, the xeric scrubland shows the most extensive distribution, while the mountain cloud forest is the most restricted (Contreras-Medina 2004; Suárez-Mota et al. 2017).
Sierra Negra in Puebla is a mountain range with a maximum elevation of 3,000 meters; it belongs to the physiographic province of the Sierra Madre del Sur and is located in the southern portion of the state of Puebla, bounded by Sierra Mazateca in Oaxaca and Zongolica in Veracruz (Lugo and Córdova 1992; INEGI 2009). It has a mean annual temperature ranging from 12 to 17 °C and total annual precipitation between 800 to 4,100 mm (INEGI 2009). It is home to a variety of habitats and vegetation types, including rainfed agriculture, cultivated pastures, mountain cloud forest, evergreen tropical forest, and pine forest (INEGI 2009). The study area was located in three regions, specifically the Sierra del Abra-Tanchipa Biosphere Reserve (RBSAT) in San Luis Potosi and Los Mármoles National Park (PNM) in Hidalgo; the Natural Resources Protection Area named Río Necaxa Hydrographic Basin (APRNCHRN) in Puebla; and Sierra Negra in Puebla (Figure 1).
Sampling Design. Sampling was carried out from October 2013 to January 2014 using StealthCam (Delta 8.0 Mpx®) digital camera-traps. Each camera trap was set to record wildlife both day and night during the 24-hour period, with a 3-second delay between photographic records. Each camera also recorded a 90-second video. The sampling design consisted of installing 63 simple photo-trapping stations distributed across the four sampling sites along the main roads, paths, or trails to maximize the likelihood of ocelot capture (Table 1). Trapping stations were spaced 1.5-2.0 km apart, considering the minimum area of activity of an adult female ocelot (Martínez-Meyer 1997; Torres-Romero et al. 2017).
Potential Distribution Modeling (MDP). Occurrence records of L. pardalis were obtained from fieldwork and from the scientific literature between 1990 and 2015, seeking to gather the highest number of records on the presence of ocelot in recent decades. The literature review was performed using the “ISI web of knowledge” database (https://www.accesowok.fecyt.es/). In addition, we included records of scientific collections such as the Colección de Foto Colectas Biológicas (CFB) of the Instituto de Biología at the Universidad Autonoma de México (http://unibio.unam.mx/collections/specimens/urn/IBUNAM:CFB:FB) and the databases: Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, www.gbif.org), Mammal Networked Information System (Manis, www.manisnet.org), Unidad Informática para la Biodiversidad (UNIBIO, www.unibio.unam.mx), and the Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO, www.conabio.gob.mx). Then, occurrence records were reviewed for inconsistencies, discarding dubious and duplicate records, retaining 59 locality-unique records for analysis, nine coming from fieldwork and 50 from literature and databases.
We used the 19 digital climatic variables described for Mexico (Cuervo-Robayo et al. 2013). Each layer was in raster format at a 1 km2 spatial resolution and adjusted clipped to the study region (Figure 1). We used presence records and climatic variables for modeling the potential distribution of L. pardalis using the maximum entropy algorithm Maxent ver. 3.3.3k (Phillips et al. 2006). We chose the following output settings for our models: maximum number of background points = 10,000, regularization multiplier = 1, replicates = 20, type of replication execution= bootstrap, convergence threshold = 0.00001, and maximum number of iterations = 10,000. We built models using 70 % as training data and the remaining 30 % for evaluation using the Area Under the Curve (AUC) generated by the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) technique performed by the same Maxent program (Hanley and McNeil 1983). We assessed the contribution of each environmental variable with the Jackknife method implemented in Maxent. We converted the cumulative Maxent output to a binary map using the 10-percentile threshold value (Figure 2).
Next, we derived the landcover aptitude to support ocelot populations based on an analysis of the number of records of the species in land-use and vegetation classes obtained from INEGI (2011; available at: http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/recnat/usosuelo/; Table 1). To do so, we reclassified the land-use and vegetation classes in four categories based on the ecological requirements of the species (Anderson et al. 2002), obtained from the association between the presence of the species and vegetation types, as reported by several authors throughout its distribution range (Martínez-Calderas et al. 2011, 2015; Valdez-Jiménez et al. 2013; Ahumada-Carrillo et al. 2013; Martínez-Hernández et al. 2014; Servin et al. 2016; Table 2), as follows: optimal (suitable habitat), suboptimal (habitat with minimum environmental conditions for its presence), marginal, and inhospitable; the latter comprises unfavorable zones with no presence of ocelots due to disturbance and anthropic activity.
Results
Ocelot Records. Photographic records of L. pardalis were obtained at two sampling sites: The Sierra del Abra-Tanchipa Biosphere Reserve, in San Luis Potosí, and Sierra Negra, in Puebla, with an overall sampling effort for both areas of 1,258 trap-days. We also recorded ocelot cubs in evergreen and deciduous tropical forests in both sites. By contrast, no ocelot records were obtained in Los Mármoles National Park and the Necaxa River Basin Natural Resources Protection Area with a sampling effort of 1,123 trap-days. Most phtographs (82 %) were captured below 1,000 m, with 260 m as the record at the lowest elevation, corresponding to the Sierra del Abra-Tanchipa; the record at the highest elevation was in Sierra Negra, at 1,117 m. We recorded ocelots in four types of vegetation: deciduous tropical forest (46 %), evergreen tropical forest (36 %), secondary vegetation (9 %), and riparian vegetation (9 %).
Potential Distribution and Suitable Habitat. Seventy-eight percent of the study area presented suitable environmental conditions for the presence of L. pardalis, while the remaining 22 % was identified as an unfavorable area (Figure 2). The unfavorable area is in the western portion of the Sierra Madre, bordering the Southern Highlands (“Zacatecano-Potosino”) province and the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. The mean AUC value for the L. pardalis distribution models was 0.825 (± 0.012). Thirteen environmental variables contributed to account for 100 % of the variation in the potential distribution of ocelot (Precipitation of Driest Quarter; Bio17) , Precipitation of Wettest Month (Bio13), Precipitation of Warmest Quarter (Bio18), Precipitation Seasonality (Bio15), Precipitation of Wettest Quarter (Bio16), Temperature Seasonality (Bio04), Isothermality (BIO2/BIO7; Bio03), Min Temperature of Coldest Month (Bio06), Temperature Annual Range (Bio07), Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter (Bio08), Precipitation of Driest Month (Bio14), Annual Mean Temperature (Bio01), Max Temperature of Warmest Month (Bio05), but only three explained 65 % of the predicted potential distribution: precipitation of the driest trimester (bio 17), precipitation of the wettest month (bio 13), and precipitation of the warmer trimester (bio 18). We obtained eight vegetation types for optimal zones, 15 for suboptimal zones, 18 for marginal, and 9 for inhospitable (Table 1). Based on this classification, 17 % of the habitat was optimal; 33 % sub-optimal, 19 % marginal, and 31 % inhospitable (Figure 3).
Study sites | Period (2013/2014) | Duration (days) | Photo-trapping stations | Trap-nights |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sierra del Abra-Tanchipa Biosphere Reserve | 4 Nov. - 7 Dec. 2013 | 34 | 20 | 680 |
Los Mármoles National Park | 8 Oct. - 23 Nov. 2013 | 47 | 17 | 799 |
Natural Resources Protection Area named Río Necaxa Hydrographic Basin | 13 Dic. 2013 - 17 Jan. 2014 | 36 | 9 | 324 |
Sierra Negra | 14 Dec. 2013 - 16 Jan. 2014 | 34 | 17 | 578 |
Total | 63 | 2,381 |
Discussion
Presence of the Species in the Study Areas. In the Sierra del Abra Tanchipa Biosphere Reserve and Sierra Negra, the ocelot was present with males and females, the latter accompanied by offspring. The presence of offspring in a population is worth stressing, mainly because it is indicative of recruitment and turnover of individuals. Most presence records occurred at elevations below 1,000 m (82 %), a finding consistent with Aranda (2005). In previous works, the deciduous and evergreen tropical forests were habitats with the highest incidence of ocelot records (Ramirez-Bravo et al. 2010; Martínez-Calderas et al. 2011), in agreement with our findings. Interestingly, we recorded no individuals in Los Mármoles National Park or the Necaxa River. However, other studies conducted subsequently reported several carnivorous species, including ocelot, in Los Mármoles (Aguilar-López et al. 2016), although the analysis of the records is not specified in detail. Our modeling results suggest that Los Mármoles likely includes suitable habitat to harbor ocelot populations, or at least it can function as a corridor.
In Sierra del Abra Tanchipa Biosphere Reserve, most of the core, buffer, and use areas remain undisturbed; however, the habitat surrounding this reserve to the south is continuously transformed for use in agriculture and livestock raising. The polygon of the Reserve holds a large patch of primary vegetation that is possibly used by ocelots as a transit corridor in SMO (Table 2). It is worth mentioning that, besides the ocelot population located in the Sierra del Abra-Tanchipa (Martínez-Hernández et al. 2014), a second population known for eastern Mexico is located in Sierra Negra (Galindo-Aguilar et al. 2016). Sierra Negra is an area still covered by patches of primary vegetation and optimal and sub-optimal habitats that favor the presence of ocelots and some potential prey (Galindo-Aguilar et al. 2016).
Potential Distribution Models. The potential distribution model of L. pardalis is useful for exploring aspects related to its conservation in the study area. The results obtained are consistent with the habitat quality and connectivity models obtained for northeastern Mexico (Martínez-Calderas et al. 2011, 2015). Precipitation regimes are important in the distribution of various species of wild mammals such as felids and ungulates in Mexico (Carrillo et al. 2015; Martínez-Calderas et al. 2011, 2015; Ortíz-García et al. 2012), and rodents in Arizona, US (Morrison et al. 2002). In addition, tropical environments with high rainfall are usually associated with the presence of various trophic guilds (predators and prey; Di Bitetti et al. 2008). These results are consistent with our findings, where the potential distribution model suggests that precipitation of the driest trimester, the wettest month, and the hottest trimester contributed to explaining over 60 % of the potential distribution of ocelot in the southern Sierra Madre and Sierra Negra in Puebla.
Classification of Habitat Aptitude | Land Uses and Vegetation Types | |
---|---|---|
Primary Vegetation | Secondary Vegetation | |
Evergreen tropical forest | ||
Deciduous tropical forest | ||
Subdeciduous tropical forest | ||
Optimal | Mountain cloud forest | |
Crassicaule scrubland | ||
Microphyll scrubland | ||
Rosetophilous Scrubland | ||
Submontane scrubland | ||
Sub-optimal | Oak forest | Evergreen tropical forest |
Pine forest | Deciduous tropical forest Semi-evergreen tropical forest | |
Oak-pine forest | Subdeciduous tropical forest | |
Pine-oak forest | Mountain cloud forest | |
Fir forest | crassicaule scrubland | |
Juniper forest | Microphilic desert scrubland | |
Rosetophilous desert scrubland | ||
Submontane scrubland | ||
Secondary Vegetation | Agroecosystems | |
Oak forest | Cultivated and induced forest | |
Pine forest | Cultivated and induced pastures | |
Oak-pine forest | Natural and induced palm-dominated forest | |
Pine-oak forest | Xerophilous halophilic vegetation | |
Fir forest | Halophilic grassland | |
Marginal | Juniper forest | Xerophilic mezquital |
Mezquite woodland | Xerophilous halophilic vegetation | |
Gallery forest | ||
Chaparral | ||
Gallery vegetation | ||
Gallery tropical forest | ||
Agriculture | ||
Human settlements | ||
Body of water | ||
barren land | ||
Inhospitable | High mountain meadow | |
Tular | ||
No apparent vegetation | ||
Halophilic hydrophilic vegetation | ||
Urban zone |
Importance of Sierra Madre Oriental, Sierra Negra, and Human Impac. We recorded ocelot offspring in evergreen and deciduous tropical forests, which are the vegetation types with the lowest degree of human disturbance. The presence of offspring is an important attribute indicating that populations are reproductively active and the sites where offspring were recorded hold the ecological requirements for the species to reproduce and persist (Hernández-Huerta 1992; Sunquist and Sunquist 2002). This finding indicates the importance of the remaining deciduous and the evergreen tropical forests patches, as both vegetation types likely function as habitats providing shelter, food, resting sites, and security to protect their offspring from predators. The areas surroundings Sierra del Abra-Tanchipa show a high degree of fragmentation; however, there is a resident population of L. pardalis in the Reserve (Martínez-Hernández et al. 2014). Probably, ocelots and other felines use patches of vegetation that favor their mobility and dispersal to other vegetation remnants, thus promoting the recolonization of other areas (Espinoza-Medinilla et al. 2018).
Our results suggest that the southern portion of the Sierra Madre Oriental, specifically the State of San Luis Potosi and Sierra Negra, still maintain little disturbed areas of vegetation that, as a whole, are likely to function as a priority north-south biological corridor (Grigione et al. 2009; Dueñas-López et al. 2015). For example, ocelots have been reported in some areas of Hidalgo and Puebla (Hernández-Flores et al. 2013; Ramirez-Bravo et al. 2010; Aguilar-López et al. 2016), which may indicate the mobility of ocelots across the Sierra Madre and Sierra Negra.
High levels of anthropogenic habitat disturbance may force individuals to migrate into ecosystems with ecological or biological characteristics that are less suitable for survival (Oliveira 1994). Our results from the potential distribution model suggest that Los Mármoles and the Necaxa River did not present optimum environmental conditions for the presence of ocelots, although these may function as transit areas. In this regard, the subsequent record in Los Mármoles (Aguilar-López et al. 2016) suggests that the region may be used as a transit area towards the southern Sierra Madre, indicating that the ocelot is probably tolerant to certain degree of human disturbance (Galindo-Aguilar et al. 2016).
Based on our classification of habitat aptitude, the areas that recorded the presence of ocelot exhibited ideal conditions for them to function as biological corridors along the Sierra Madre and Sierra Negra, according to the red and yellow polygons shown in Figure 3. Therefore, we suggest implementing a systematic monitoring in areas adjacent to the study area to determine the extent to which human stressors affect the distribution of ocelots in the Sierra Madre and Sierra Negra. Besides, a molecular study should be conducted to investigate the genetic identity of this population and its relationship with the populations of Oaxaca and southeastern Mexico. Recording ocelots in adjacent areas is deemed relevant information that will enable the development of a more robust habitat connectivity model to advance better knowledge of a possible north-to-south dispersal of ocelot populations. Animal mobility is critical for preserving demographically and genetically healthy populations for conservation (Shepard et al. 2008). The fragmentation of the Sierra Madre, in particular, is especially worrying and is a problem that needs to be addressed strategically for the long-term conservation, not only of the ocelot, but of the biodiversity that coexist with it (Escalante et al. 2005).
This study contributes with basic, yet indispensable information for the conservation of the ocelot. Our results highlight that precipitation variables are related to the distribution patterns of the ocelot in the Sierra Madre and Sierra Negra.