INTRODUCTION
Gastropods are a diverse taxonomic group of animals and the only group of phylum Mollusca that occurs in marine, freshwater, and terrestrial environments. The latter two, members of the subclasses Heterobranchia and Caenogastropoda-Neritimorpha (formerly Pulmonata and Prosobranchia, respectively) (Bouchet et al., 2017), have special adaptations in the mantle cavity that allows them to breathe atmospheric oxygen (Brusca & Brusca, 2005).
Gastropods are a fundamental part of ecosystems, the mucus they generate is rich in nutrients which facilitates the colonization of microbes that degrade organic matter in the soil (Berg, 1994). They form a part of the diet of birds, snakes, mammals, and other invertebrates (Sazima, 1989), and are also intermediary hosts of parasites that infected the organisms that consume them (Fleta-Zaragozano, 2017). When dying, the empty shell degrades and provides calcium to the soil (Lannge, 2003).
The distribution of these organisms is closely related to the temperature, relative humidity, thickness, and complexity of the layer of leaf litter, soil humidity and compaction and diversity of plant communities (Schilthuizen et al., 2005). They also have the ability to accumulate heavy metals, in which they have consequently been used as bioindicators of ecosystem alteration and pollution (Pérez et al., 2006).
Mexico has 1,184 species recorded, in which Veracruz is the most diverse state with 267 species, followed by the state of Chiapas with 128 (Thompson, 2011; Naranjo-García & Smith, 2014). Despite this, Chiapas has had few studies conducted (Naranjo-García, 2014; Naranjo-García & Smith, 2014). All species found in Chiapas have been recorded in the works of Bequaert (1957), Thompson (1966; 1967; 1976), Naranjo-Garcia et al. (2000), Naranjo-Garcia (2003), Avendaño-Gil et al. (2010), Falcón-Brindis et al. (2014), Naranjo-García and Smith (2014) which covered an important area of the state, especially the central and eastern area. Consequently, regions such as the southeast -which presents environmental conditions conducive to the development of this group of organisms- are practically unexplored.
The southeastern area of Chiapas State has been subjected to high anthropic pressure. In most hydrographic watersheds, the primary vegetation has decreased significantly or even disappeared due to changes in land use intended for agriculture and livestock. For example, the Coatán River watershed maintains only 16% of its area with original tree cover, restricted basically to the upper area of the watershed (Flores-Chilel, 2015). Given the lack of knowledge about terrestrial gastropod fauna in the southeastern area of the state and their sensitivity to habitat loss due to changes in land use, this work is intended to present a taxonomic list of terrestrial gastropod species present in the Coatán River watershed, as well as to estimate the changes in species richness and abundance between main plant associations, natural and altered, in the main zones of the watershed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area. The Coatán River watershed is a binational watershed shared between Mexico and Guatemala, located to the east of the Sierra Madre of Chiapas and the Mexican Pacific coastal plain within coordinates 92° 31' 12'' and 92° 07' 36'' of westerly longitude and 15° 16' 36'' and 14 °46' 12'' northerly latitude (Kauffer, 2010). The Mexican portion of the watershed has an area of 36,751.70 ha (Fig. 1) within the municipal limits of Tapachula, Mazatán, Motozintla and Cacahoatán (CONAGUA, 2003).
The climate of the watershed varies due to its gradient, giving two well-defined climatic seasons: the high precipitation season (HP), that occurs between the months of June to November, and the low precipitation season (LP), between the months of December to May (García, 1998). The average annual precipitation is 2,500 mm but varies between areas of the watershed. The upper zone averages 3,252 mm while the lower zone averages 1,420 mm (CONAGUA, 2010). It has two climatic classifications: wet temperate (C (m) w" i g) and semi-warm wet (A (C) m (w") i g), the plant associations characteristic of the area are the Mesophilic Mountain forest, Tropical Evergreen forest, Pine-Oak forest and Xeric scrubland (Miranda & Hernandez, 1963). In this area, maize and beans are the main land use and are cultivated by producers for their own consumption. In the middle zone, the climate is warm and humid (A m (w") i g), where the corresponding plant associations for this area are Tropical Semi-Evergreen forest, and Semi-Deciduous forest, the main antrophic activity is coffee production. In the lower zone of the watershed the climate is warm and sub-humid (A w2 (w) i g), where the landscape is composed almost entirely of fruit crops, paddocks and an emerging portion of low deciduous forest, palm, mangrove and grassland (CONAGUA, 2003; Rzedowski, 2006; Grajales et al., 2008).
Sampling design. The study area was divided into three zones according to the natural climatic division of the watershed: Upper Zone (UZ), Middle Zone (MZ) and Lower Zone (LZ) (Fig. 1). In each zone, three of the main plant associations (included natural and altered) were selected at an approximate distance of four kilometers apart from each other. The site 1’s (S1) in each area were considered as sites with primary or original plant associations. Unfortunately, in the MZ and LZ, sites could not be located with these characteristics and were replaced by Acahuales (secondary vegetation) with over 15 years of disuse and with a tree canopy 20 m high on average. For the MZ, the S1 was located in a diversified shade coffee crop with a tree canopy greater than 20 m. For the UZ, the S1 was located in a plant association of the Mesophilic Mountain Forest. The site 2’s (S2) were Acahuales of six to ten years in disuse with a tree canopy between 10 m to 20 m high for both the UZ and LZ. In the MZ, the site 2 was located in a diversified shade coffee crop with a variable canopy less than 20 m high. The site 3’s (S3) were characterized by the presence of the main agricultural activity characteristic of each zone: as corn-grassland in the UZ and LZ, and sun-exposed coffee crop with a shrub stratum less than 5 m high in the MZ.
Fieldwork. Three transects of 50 linear meters and 2 m wide were traced at each sampling site, in which the search of target species under rocks, pulled-away logs, in trees, and in leaf litter was carried out. In each transect, three quadrants of 25 x 25 cm located at 0 m, 25 m and 50 m were laid out, where leaf litter and a soil sample with a volume of 25 x 25 x 10 cm were collected. In each quadrant, data was taken for the environmental temperature (°C) and relative humidity (%), which were taken with the Sper scientific multiparametric probe 850070.
Laboratory work. The leaf litter and soil samples were reviewed under the microscope ‘Zeiss Stemi DV4 stereomicroscope’. The gastropods found were separated, counted, and identified. The live material was placed in beer for 24 hours (Naranjo-García & Gómez-Espinoza, 2011) for the body to relax and was then preserved in alcohol (70%). The identification of the organisms was carried out with the help of the guide made by Fahy (2003) and the works of Thompson (2011), Pilsbry (1906; 1907-1908; 1939; 1940; 1946; 1948) and, Martens (1890-1901), while the systematic arrangement was based on the proposal of Bouchet et al. (2017). The corroboration of the identification process was carried out in the Nacional Collection of Mollusks, at the Institute of Biology of the Universidad Autónoma de México (UNAM).
Three subsamples of 100 gr of soil of each quadrant sample were analyzed to estimate pH, soil moisture, the amount of organic matter and soil texture, these variables were taken as soon as possible after being collected.
Data analysis. To estimate differences in species composition between levels of each factor, the biological data was analyzed with a Multivariate Permutational Variance Analysis (PERMANOVA), using the Sorensen coefficient as a similarity criterion and a significance limit level of α = 0.05. A Percentage Similarity Analysis (SIMPER) was performed to determine the contribution of each species with respect to the similarity or dissimilarity of the species sets from each zone of the watershed, for this purpose the Sorensen coefficient was used as a similarity criterion.
The environmental data was standardized and analyzed using a Multivariate Permutational Variance Analysis (PERMANOVA), using the Euclidean Distance index as a similarity criterion with a significance limit level of α = 0.05.
To estimate the relationship between the environmental variables and the biological data, a Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) was carried out with a significance level limit of α = 0.05. For this analysis, species that were more abundant than one individual were included.
RESULTS
A total of 342 organisms was obtained, which were classified into 16 families, 29 genera and 43 species (Table 1); 16 of them were identified at the genus level due to either deterioration of shells or no match was found with any species described.
Species | UZ | MZ | LZ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | S2 | S3 | S1 | S2 | S3 | S1 | S2 | S3 | |
Adelopoma stolli von Martens, 1890 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Allopeas gracile Hutton, 1934 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Amphicyclotus ponderosus Pfeiffer, 1851 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 32 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Beckianum beckianum beckianum Pfeiffer, 1846 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bulimulus unicolor Sowerby, 1833 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Carychium mexicanum Pilsbry, 1891 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 0 |
Cecilioides (Geostilba) aperta Swainson, 1840 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Cecilioides (Karolus) consobrinus primus De Folin, 1870 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chanomphalus pilsbryi Baker, 1927 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chanomphalus Strebel, 1880 Chanomphalus sp. 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chanomphalus Strebel, 1880 Chanomphalus sp. 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Drepanostomella stolli von Martens, 1892 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Drymaeus Albers, 1850 Drymaeus sp. 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Euglandina Crosse & Fischer, 1870 Euglandina sp. 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Euglandina Crosse & Fischer, 1870 Euglandina sp. 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Guppya M'rch, 1867 Guppya sp. 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
Helicina (Oxyrhombus) ghiesbreghti Pfeiffer, 1856 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Helicina (Tristramia) tenuis Pfeiffer, 1849 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Lamellaxis martensi martensi Pfeiffer, 1856 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Lamellaxis mexicanus mexicanus Pfeiffer, 1866 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Leptinaria Beck, 1839 Leptinaria sp. 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
Leptinaria stolli von Martens, 1898 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Leptopeas micra Orbigny, 1835 | 44 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Miradiscops panamensis Pilsbry, 1930 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Miradiscops haplocochlion Thompson, 1967 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Miradiscops maya Pilsbry, 1920 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 3 |
Miradiscops Baker, 1925 Miradiscops sp. 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Miraverellia Baker, 1922 Miraverellia sp. 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Neocyclotus dysoni ambiguus von Martens, 1890 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Nesovitrea subhyalina subhyalina Pfeiffer, 1867 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Orthalicus Beck, 1837 Orthalicus sp. 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rectaxis intermedus Strebel, 1882 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Rectaxis Baker, 1926 Rectaxis sp. 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Streptostyla Shuttleworth, 1852 Streptostyla sp. 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Striatura (Striatura) meridionalis Pilsbry & Ferriss, 1906 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 0 |
Strobilops strebeli cf spp. Pfeiffer, 1862 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subulin octone Bruguiare, 1792 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thysanophora (Thysanophora) costaricensis Rehder, 1942 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Thysanophora Strebel & Pfeffer, 1880 Thysanophora sp. 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Varicoglandina Pilsbry, 1908Varicoglandina sp. 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Volutaxis (Volutaxis) sulciferus sulciferus Morelet, 1851 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Zonitoides Lehmann, 1862 Zonitoides sp. 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Zonitoides Lehmann, 1862 Zonitoides sp. 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The genus Drepanostomella (Bourguignat, 1889) and the species, Drepanostomella stolli (Von Martens, 1892), Amphicyclotus ponderosus (Pfeiffer, 1851), Cecilioides (Geostilba) native of The Antilles (Swainson, 1840), Leptinaria stolli (Von Martens, 1898), and Thysanophora (Thysanophora) costarisensis (Rehder, 1942), represent new records for Mexico. For the state of Chiapas, the Strobilopsidae family has been reported for the first time with the species Strobilops strebeli, with its subspecies to be confirmed (Pfeiffer, 1862). Equally, the Gastrodontidae family was reported with the species Striatura (Striatura) meridionalis (Pilsbry & Ferriss, 1906) and the Diplommatinidae family with the species Adelopoma stolli (Von Martens, 1890). Also reported are the genera: Rectaxis (Baker, 1926) Rectaxis intermedius (Strebel, 1882), Nesovitrea (Cooke, 1921), Nesovitrea subhyalina subhyalina (Pfeiffer,1867), and Zonitoides sp. (Lehmann, 1862), as well as the species Cecilioides (Karolus) consobrinus primus (De Folin, 1870), Lamellaxis mexicanus mexicanus (Pfeiffer, 1866), Miradiscops haplocochlion (Thompson, 1967), and Miradiscops maya (Pilsbry, 1920).
The species Leptopeas micra (D´Orbigny, 1835) (14.6%), A. ponderosus (11.4%), N. subhyalina subhyalina (7.9%) and Neocyclotus dysoni ambiguus ( Von Martens, 1890) (7.9%), accounted for 41.8% of the total abundance of gastropods at all sampling sites in the watershed. The watershed zone with the largest number of species was the MZ with 28. The zone with the lowest number of species was the LZ with eight species (Fig. 2). The sites with the highest number of species were the site 2’s for the LZ and MZ zones and the site 1 for the UZ (Fig. 3). Of the total abundance recorded, 50% (171 individuals, highest value) was found in the MZ and 22.5% (77 individuals, lowest value) was found in the LZ. The greatest abundances of species in each zone were recorded in the site 1’s of the LZ and UZ, and in the site 2 of the MZ (Fig. 4).
The assembly of species, depending on the specific zone, differed between all areas (p = 0.001; pseudo F = 8.3421). The dissimilarity between LZ and MZ was 97.56%, in which the species that contributed a higher percentage to this were: L. micra (10.04%), Lamellaxis martensi martensi (Pfeiffer, 1856) (8.27%) from the LZ and MZ. Amphicyclotus ponderosus (11.03%), N. dysoni ambiguus (8.75%), N. subhyalina subhyalina (8.68%), and L. mexicanus mexicanus (7.03%). Between the LZ and UZ, the dissimilarity was 100%, in which the species that had the greatest contribution to such dissimilarity were: L. martensi martensi (11.28%), L. micra (10.34%), Bulimulus unicolor (Sowerby, 1833) (9.40%) from the LZ, and Rectaxis sp.1 (8.37%), Carychium mexicanum (Pilsbry, 1891) (8.01%) and M. maya (7.80%) from the UZ. The MZ and UZ differed by 96.47%, in which the species that contributed most to this were: A. ponderosus (9.66%), N. subhyalina subhyalina (8.62%), Beckianum beckianum beckianum (Pfeiffer, 1846) (7.74%), L. mexicanus mexicanus (6.15%), N. dysoni ambiguus (6.07%), C. (Geostilba) aperta (4.22%) from the MZ, and the M. maya (5.10%) and C. mexicanum (4.01%) from the UZ.
The assembly of species between sites in each zone only showed differences (p = 0.02; pseudo F = 1.6576) between site 1 and site 3 of the UZ (Table 2).
Factor | df | SS | MS | Pseudo-F | p | % variation explained |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zone | 2 | 75.529 | 37.765 | 21.978 | 0.001 | 51% |
Site | 6 | 49.542 | 8.257 | 4.8055 | 0.001 | 28% |
Residual | 16 | 30.929 | 1.7183 | 22% | ||
Total | 24 | 156 | 100% |
The lowest environmental temperature recorded during fieldwork was 21.5°C at the S3 site of the UZ, while the highest temperature was 28.4°C at the S2 site of the ZB (Fig. 5A). The lowest pH value of the soil, 6.5, was registered at the S3 site of the MZ and the highest, 6.9, at the S1 site of the UZ (Fig. 5B). Relative humidity ranged from 72.6% in the S1 site of the UZ to 94.6% in the S2 site of the MZ (Fig. 5C). Soil moisture was consistently lower in the LZ and higher in the UZ with a downward trend in moisture levels from the S1 sites to S3 sites for both these zones. The lowest values were recorded in the S3 site of the LZ (8.7%), while the highest values (56.2%) were recorded in the S2 site of the UZ (Fig. 5D). Similar values were recorded between sites in the MZ. The amount of organic matter in the soil was lower in the LZ and the MZ, with values measured between 11.6% (in S3 of the LZ) and 21% (in S1 of the LZ), while in the UZ values of up to 40.5% were recorded in the S2 (Fig. 5E).
In the LZ, the soil textures recorded in sites S1 and S2 were sandy loam, muddy loam and muddy. In addition, muddy, clay-like loam was recorded at the S3 site. Throughout the MZ, the predominant soil texture was clay-like, however muddy, clay-like loam, and muddy clay textures were also recorded. In the UZ, the predominant textures recorded were clay-like, and muddy clay, although muddy loam, clay-like loam and muddy clay loam were also recorded in the S1 site. In the S2 site, muddy loam, clay-like loam, and muddy clay loam textures were recorded and muddy clay, muddy, and muddy clay loam textures were observed in the S3 site.
Environmental variables showed differences between watershed zones (p = 0.001; pseudo F = 21.978), and between sites (pseudo F = 4.8055), whilst only sites S1 and S3 of the MZ showed no difference (p = 0.907) (Table 3).
Factor | df | SS | MS | Pseudo-F | p | % variation explained |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zone | 2 | 37087 | 18544 | 8.3421 | 0.001 | 44% |
Site | 6 | 22109 | 3684.8 | 1.6576 | 0.02 | 11% |
Residual | 16 | 35566 | 2222.9 | 45% | ||
Total | 24 | 96417 | 100% |
The CCA showed three corresponding groupings (Fig. 6) -one for each zone of the watershed- where the variation explained with the CCA was 59.7% in the first two axes (first axis 35.44%; p = 0.001 and second axis 24.3%; p = 0.002). Soil texture, temperature, relative humidity, and organic matter were the variables with the greatest influence on the dispersion of the data.
DISCUSSION
The knowledge of the diversity of land gastropods in southern Mexico and Central America is limited, it is estimated that only between 10% and 30% of this diversity is known (Naranjo-García, 2003; Thompson, 2011). The lack of knowledge is reflected in the results of this work, given that 11% of the species found in the Coatán River watershed were new records for Mexico. For the Chiapas state, 23% including the registration of three families and 11 species, also 37% of the total species could not be determined even though they were found in conditions conducive to their identification, meaning they could potentially be new species.
The existence of some of these new records of gastropods either increases their presence or confirms it in areas where their presence was likely. The species D. stolli had been reported for the San José area in Costa Rica (Martens, 1890-1901) with an average annual rainfall of 2,250 mm, an average annual temperature of 20.5°C, and litosol and andosol soils (Solano & Villalobos, 2019). It has also been reported to the department of Estelí in Nicaragua (González-Valdivia et al., 2018), which has an annual rainfall of 1,250 mm, clay-like loam soils, and an annual average temperature of 23°C (INIDE & MAGFOR, 2013), and also in the department of Alta Verapaz, Guatemala (Hinkley, 1920), where the average annual temperature is 22.7°C and the average annual relative humidity is 81% (INIDE, 2013).
The species Cecilioides (Geostilba) aperta has been reported in the Antilles (Swainson, 1840; Pilsbry, 1946) and in Nicaragua (Pérez & López, 2002), M. panamensis in Nicaragua (Pérez & López, 2002) and Panama (Pilsbry, 1930), A. ponderosus in Guatemala, and L. stolli and T. (Thysanorphora) costaricensis in Costa Rica (Rehder, 1942) and Nicaragua (Pérez & López, 2001). The distribution of these species increases towards the northwest of Central America within the ecoregion called the Neotropical realm, a region characterized by tropical and subtropical humid forests with altitudes of up to 4,000m above sea level, a temperate climate from 18°C to 24°C and high rainfall of 2,000-4,000 mm annually (Olson et al., 2001).
The presence of Adelopomas stolli confirms its distribution around the southeast of the country, as it had already been previously reported in San Luis Potosí (Correa-Sandoval, 1999) and Tamaulipas (Correa-Sandoval & Rodríguez, 2005). Furthermore, it had also been recorded in Guatemala and Nicaragua (Pérez & López, 2001). This species has been located in sites with characteristically good soil condition, with high soil moisture, abundant leaf litter and humus (Correa-Sandoval et al., 2009; Garcés et al., 2009). In this work the species was registered in the S1 site of the UZ -the site in the best state of conservation.
It is important to mention that of the total number of species recorded in the Coatán River watershed, two of them can be considered as exotic. Allopeas gracile, which has a wide distribution, was first reported in Mirzapur, India, but its country of origin is uncertain (Pilsbry, 1946). Pfeiffer (1839) first recorded it in the Americas in Matanzas and Havana, Cuba, so it is likely that it has arrived and spread on the continent through arable or garden plants, where it is frequently found (Martens & Thiele, 1903).
Species C. (Geostilba) aperta is a species reported by Swainson (1840) as a native of the Antilles. Pilsbry (1946) comments that it was able to reach the continent through garden plants, however, its presence was reported by Henderson in 1914 in an uncultivated desert town in Florida. Consequently, the idea of migration through garden plants is doubtful. Both species were found in areas where there is increased human and agricultural activity (LZ and MZ).
The ratio of Heterobranchia gastropods (Hb) to Caenogastropoda-Neritimorpha (Ca-Ne) has been considered as a conservation status indicator of forested areas (Schilthuizen et al., 2005; Raheem et al., 2008; Nurinsiyah et al., 2016). Ca-Ne gastropods are closely linked with habitats of dense tree cover and high humidity because their mantle cavity is open and tends to lose water, unlike the Hb in which the mantle cavity is connected to the outside by a narrow respiratory pore or pneumostome that can be closed (Solem, 1974). This allows them to live in altered habitats of low tree cover, in warmer climates with less relative humidity, and in the soil.
The ratio of Hb to Ca-Ne in the Coatán River watershed was 89% and 11%, respectively, although this ratio varied with respect to the watershed zone. In the LZ, 100% of species were Hb while in the UZ, 99.95% were Hb and 0.05% Ca-Ne. In the MZ, 85.72% were Hb and 14.28% Ca-Ne. These proportions contrast with what was reported by Avendaño-Gil et al. (2010) who found a ratio of 75% Hb and 25% Ca-Ne in the Lacandona Forest in the Ixcán river region. In the Saba Hills of Malaysia, Schilthuizen et al. (2005) also reported a ratio of 54% Hb and 46% Ca-Ne, in both regions the coverage of the original vegetation was important.
The absence of Ca-Ne in the LZ may be related to the intensity and type of agricultural activity, in which temporary agriculture and livestock occupy 97% of the area (Flores-Chilel, 2015). These activities require open spaces to burn vegetation to maintain soil without vegetation, thus the areas have a lower relative humidity and higher temperature, conditions not conducive to the Ca-Ne.
Nearly all the species of Ca-Ne recorded in this work were found in the MZ, where the relative humidity was the variable that had the greatest influence in the area. Its impact was had on the assembly of the following species that characterized this area: A. gracile, A. ponderosus, N. subhyalina subhyalina, B. beckianum beckianum, L. mexicanus mexicanus and N. dysoni ambiguus. This last species has been found in areas of primary vegetation, at altitudes from 212 m to 1,094 m above sea level (Avendaño-Gil, 2004; González-Valdivia et al., 2011).
In both the LZ and the MZ, the primary vegetation areas are practically non-existent. Unlike the LZ, the MZ has more rainfall (1,345 mm and 4,252 mm, respectively) and diversified shade coffee is grown in the zone, which maintains shrub and arboreal coverage and consequently favors other variables such as relative humidity. It is likely that for this reason the zone maintained the greatest shade and diversity of species and individuals, even maintaining Ca-Ne species. It is important to mention that diversified shaded coffee crops have been considered low-impact crops for biodiversity and a refuge for other species such as reptiles and amphibians (Macip-Ríos & Casas-Andreu, 2008; Rojas, et al., 2012; Muños-Cruz, 2016).
The UZ was characterized by higher soil moisture, organic matter, and fine soils; conditions recorded mainly for the S1 site. The assembly of species associated with these conditions was represented by the species R. intermedius, S. (striatura) meridionalis, A. stolli and C. mexicanum, in which the latter species has been reported as typical of mountain mesophyll forest vegetation, of very fine soils with a high content of organic matter (condition observed in the soils of this site) and is sensitive to disturbances (Snodgrass, 1998; Correa-Sandoval et al., 2009).
The association of species observed for the LZ is represented by L. martensi martensi, B. unicolor and L. micra micra. This area was characterized by having a higher environmental temperature, lower relative humidity, thick soil texture, and little organic matter content typical of eroded sites. Leptopeas micra micra has in fact been reported as tolerant, cosmopolitan and has been found in secondary forests, anthropized habitats, and even urban areas (Maceira et al., 2013).
The wealth of species assemblies did not differ significantly between the LZ and MZ sites, however, the S1 site of the UZ had a greater wealth of species than the S3 site (the S1 site of the UZ was the only primary vegetation site in the whole watershed). There was, however, a decrease shown in the abundance of species in the S1 site, from the areas of highest to lowest coverage. The little variation of the diversity in the assemblies of species between sites and the decrease in abundance coincided with those reported by Schilthuizen et al. (2005) in Borneo; Raheem et al. (2008) in Sri Lanka; and Nurinsiyah et al. (2016) in Java. In this regard, it is important to mention that the virtual absence of Ca-Ne and the reduction of diversity and abundance between sites of the UZ (including Hb) may be due to soil erosion in this area, which has rains of up to (4,252 mm) and steep slopes allowing the soil of the growing areas to be lost and with it individuals. Nonetheless, it is a topic that needs to be further explored given that a large diversity of Ca-Ne has been reported in areas of primary plant associations (Schilthuizen et al., 2005; Nurinsiyah et al., 2016).
CONCLUSIONS
The change or use of soil and the loss of tree cover for activities such as temporary agriculture, livestock and human establishments has a decisive influence on the reduction of diversity in the assemblies of gastropod species in the Coatán River watershed. It is likely that the intensity of these activities, especially in the Lower Zone could eventually cause the extinction of species -with Ca-Ne gastropods being especially vulnerable- a process that occurs as increases or changes in activity take place in other areas of the watershed.